scholarly journals Dome-headed, small-brained island mammal from the Late Cretaceous of Romania

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (19) ◽  
pp. 4857-4862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Csiki-Sava ◽  
Mátyás Vremir ◽  
Jin Meng ◽  
Stephen L. Brusatte ◽  
Mark A. Norell
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Size Change ◽  
Island Effect ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Marked Body ◽  
Cenozoic Mammals ◽  
Sensory Acuity ◽  
Island Habitats

The island effect is a well-known evolutionary phenomenon, in which island-dwelling species isolated in a resource-limited environment often modify their size, anatomy, and behaviors compared with mainland relatives. This has been well documented in modern and Cenozoic mammals, but it remains unclear whether older, more primitive Mesozoic mammals responded in similar ways to island habitats. We describe a reasonably complete and well-preserved skeleton of a kogaionid, an enigmatic radiation of Cretaceous island-dwelling multituberculate mammals previously represented by fragmentary fossils. This skeleton, from the latest Cretaceous of Romania, belongs to a previously unreported genus and species that possesses several aberrant features, including an autapomorphically domed skull and one of the smallest brains relative to body size of any advanced mammaliaform, which nonetheless retains enlarged olfactory bulbs and paraflocculi for sensory processing. Drawing on parallels with more recent island mammals, we interpret these unusual neurosensory features as related to the island effect. This indicates that the ability to adapt to insular environments developed early in mammalian history, before the advent of therian mammals, and mammals with insular-related modifications were key components of well-known dwarfed dinosaur faunas. Furthermore, the specimen suggests that brain size reduction, in association with heightened sensory acuity but without marked body size change, is a novel expression of the island effect in mammals.

HOLOCENE LAND SNAIL BODY SIZE CHANGE IN ALGERIA, NW AFRICA, AND ITS POSSIBLE CAUSES

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Soto ◽  
◽  
Yurena Yanes ◽  
David Lubell
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Land Snail ◽  
Size Change

scholarly journals A Farewell to the Encephalization Quotient: A New Brain Size Measure for Comparative Primate Cognition

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Carel P. van Schaik ◽  
Zegni Triki ◽  
Redouan Bshary ◽  
Sandra A. Heldstab
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Mammal Species ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Encephalization Quotient ◽  
Body Sizes ◽  
Size Measure

Both absolute and relative brain sizes vary greatly among and within the major vertebrate lineages. Scientists have long debated how larger brains in primates and hominins translate into greater cognitive performance, and in particular how to control for the relationship between the noncognitive functions of the brain and body size. One solution to this problem is to establish the slope of cognitive equivalence, i.e., the line connecting organisms with an identical bauplan but different body sizes. The original approach to estimate this slope through intraspecific regressions was abandoned after it became clear that it generated slopes that were too low by an unknown margin due to estimation error. Here, we revisit this method. We control for the error problem by focusing on highly dimorphic primate species with large sample sizes and fitting a line through the mean values for adult females and males. We obtain the best estimate for the slope of circa 0.27, a value much lower than those constructed using all mammal species and close to the value expected based on the genetic correlation between brain size and body size. We also find that the estimate of cognitive brain size based on cognitive equivalence fits empirical cognitive studies better than the encephalization quotient, which should therefore be avoided in future studies on primates and presumably mammals and birds in general. The use of residuals from the line of cognitive equivalence may change conclusions concerning the cognitive abilities of extant and extinct primate species, including hominins.

Body size, brain size, and sexual dimorphism in Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber

2017 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 119-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Garvin ◽  
Marina C. Elliott ◽  
Lucas K. Delezene ◽  
John Hawks ◽  
Steven E. Churchill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Brain Size

scholarly journals Allometry unleashed: an adaptationist approach of brain scaling in mammalian evolution

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Willemet
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Allometric Scaling ◽  
Species Differences ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Brain Evolution ◽  
Neural Systems ◽  
Selection Pressures ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Functional Consequences ◽  
Main Factor

The idea that allometry in the context of brain evolution mainly result from constraints channelling the scaling of brain components is deeply embedded in the field of comparative neurobiology. Constraints, however, only prevent or limit changes, and cannot explain why these changes happen in the first place. In fact, considering allometry as a lack of change may be one of the reasons why, after more than a century of research, there is still no satisfactory explanatory framework for the understanding of species differences in brain size and composition in mammals. The present paper attempts to tackle this issue by adopting an adaptationist approach to examine the factors behind the evolution of brain components. In particular, the model presented here aims to explain the presence of patterns of covariation among brain components found within major taxa, and the differences between taxa. The key determinant of these patterns of covariation within a taxon-cerebrotype (groups of species whose brains present a number of similarities at the physiological and anatomical levels) seems to be the presence of taxon-specific patterns of selection pressures targeting the functional and structural properties of neural components or systems. Species within a taxon share most of the selection pressures, but their levels scale with a number of factors that are often related to body size. The size and composition of neural systems respond to these selection pressures via a number of evolutionary scenarios, which are discussed here. Adaptation, rather than, as generally assumed, developmental or functional constraints, thus appears to be the main factor behind the allometric scaling of brain components. The fact that the selection pressures acting on the size of brain components form a pattern that is specific to each taxon accounts for the peculiar relationship between body size, brain size and composition, and behavioural capabilities characterizing each taxon. While it is important to avoid repeating the errors of the “Panglossian paradigm”, the elements presented here suggests that an adaptationist approach may shed a new light on the factors underlying, and the functional consequences of, species differences in brain size and composition.

scholarly journals Quantitative genetic analysis of brain size variation in sticklebacks: support for the mosaic model of brain evolution

2015 ◽  
Vol 282 (1810) ◽  
pp. 20151008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Noreikiene ◽  
Gábor Herczeg ◽  
Abigél Gonda ◽  
Gergely Balázs ◽  
Arild Husby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Additive Genetic Variance ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Brain Evolution ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Independent Evolution ◽  
Mosaic Model

The mosaic model of brain evolution postulates that different brain regions are relatively free to evolve independently from each other. Such independent evolution is possible only if genetic correlations among the different brain regions are less than unity. We estimated heritabilities, evolvabilities and genetic correlations of relative size of the brain, and its different regions in the three-spined stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ). We found that heritabilities were low (average h 2 = 0.24), suggesting a large plastic component to brain architecture. However, evolvabilities of different brain parts were moderate, suggesting the presence of additive genetic variance to sustain a response to selection in the long term. Genetic correlations among different brain regions were low (average r G = 0.40) and significantly less than unity. These results, along with those from analyses of phenotypic and genetic integration, indicate a high degree of independence between different brain regions, suggesting that responses to selection are unlikely to be severely constrained by genetic and phenotypic correlations. Hence, the results give strong support for the mosaic model of brain evolution. However, the genetic correlation between brain and body size was high ( r G = 0.89), suggesting a constraint for independent evolution of brain and body size in sticklebacks.

scholarly journals The Influence of Organized Physical Activity (Including Gymnastics) on Young Adult Skeletal Traits: Is Maturity Phase Important?

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittney Bernardoni ◽  
Tamara A. Scerpella ◽  
Paula F. Rosenbaum ◽  
Jill A. Kanaley ◽  
Lindsay N. Raab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Young Adult ◽  
Mineral Content ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Size Change ◽  
Gynecological Age ◽  
Dxa Scans ◽  
Buckling Ratio ◽  
Adult Bone

We prospectively evaluated adolescent organized physical activity (PA) as a factor in adult female bone traits. Annual DXA scans accompanied semiannual records of anthropometry, maturity, and PA for 42 participants in this preliminary analysis (criteria: appropriately timed DXA scans at ~1 year premenarche [predictor] and ~5 years postmenarche [dependent variable]). Regression analysis evaluated total adolescent interscan PA and PA over 3 maturity subphases as predictors of young adult bone outcomes: 1) bone mineral content (BMC), geometry, and strength indices at nondominant distal radius and femoral neck; 2) subhead BMC; 3) lumbar spine BMC. Analyses accounted for baseline gynecological age (years pre- or postmenarche), baseline bone status, adult body size and interscan body size change. Gymnastics training was evaluated as a potentially independent predictor, but did not improve models for any outcomes (p < .07). Premenarcheal bone traits were strong predictors of most adult outcomes (semipartial r2 = .21-0.59, p < .001). Adult 1/3 radius and subhead BMC were predicted by both total PA and PA 1-3 years postmenarche (p < .03). PA 3-5 years postmenarche predicted femoral narrow neck width, endosteal diameter, and buckling ratio (p < .05). Thus, participation in organized physical activity programs throughout middle and high school may reduce lifetime fracture risk in females.

Brain size/body weight in the dingo (Canis dingo): comparisons with domestic and wild canids

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley P. Smith ◽  
Teghan A. Lucas ◽  
Rachel M. Norris ◽  
Maciej Henneberg
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Cuon Alpinus ◽  
Size Relationship ◽  
Wild Canids ◽  
Free Ranging ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Endocranial Volume ◽  
The Brain

Endocranial volume was measured in a large sample (n = 128) of free-ranging dingoes (Canis dingo) where body size was known. The brain/body size relationship in the dingoes was compared with populations of wild (Family Canidae) and domestic canids (Canis familiaris). Despite a great deal of variation among wild and domestic canids, the brain/body size of dingoes forms a tight cluster within the variation of domestic dogs. Like dogs, free-ranging dingoes have paedomorphic crania; however, dingoes have a larger brain and are more encephalised than most domestic breeds of dog. The dingo’s brain/body size relationship was similar to those of other mesopredators (medium-sized predators that typically prey on smaller animals), including the dhole (Cuon alpinus) and the coyote (Canis latrans). These findings have implications for the antiquity and classification of the dingo, as well as the impact of feralisation on brain size. At the same time, it highlights the difficulty in using brain/body size to distinguish wild and domestic canids.

The Conquest of Land

2019 ◽  
pp. 261-336
Author(s):  
Georg F. Striedter ◽  
R. Glenn Northcutt
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Somatosensory Input ◽  
Auditory Systems

Early amniotes evolved water-resistant skin and eggs, which allowed them to live and reproduce entirely on land. Roughly 300 million years ago, amniotes split into synapsids (including mammals) and sauropsids (“reptiles” and birds). The sauropsid lineage includes squamates (lizards and snakes), turtles, and archosaurs (crocodilians and dinosaurs, including birds). Tympanic ears and more complex auditory systems evolved at least twice within the various amniote lineages. Amniotes also evolved a separate vomeronasal epithelium and more diverse modes of locomotion and feeding. Brain size relative to body size increased in early amniotes and then increased further in several amniote lineages, notably mammals and birds. The most enlarged regions were the cerebellum and the telencephalon. Within the telencephalon, sauropsids enlarged mainly the ventral pallium, whereas mammals enlarged the dorsal pallium (aka neocortex). Although these regions are not homologous to one another, they both receive unimodal auditory, visual, and somatosensory input from the thalamus.

scholarly journals Do Different Methods Yield Equivalent Estimations of Brain Size in Birds?

2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-122
Author(s):  
Diego Ocampo ◽  
César Sánchez ◽  
Gilbert Barrantes
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Brain Mass ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Evolutionary Studies ◽  
Relative Brain Size ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Endocranial Volume ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Size Estimates

The ratio of brain size to body size (relative brain size) is often used as a measure of relative investment in the brain in ecological and evolutionary studies on a wide range of animal groups. In birds, a variety of methods have been used to measure the brain size part of this ratio, including endocranial volume, fixed brain mass, and fresh brain mass. It is still unclear, however, whether these methods yield the same results. Using data obtained from fresh corpses and from published sources, this study shows that endocranial volume, mass of fixed brain tissue, and fresh mass provide equivalent estimations of brain size for 48 bird families, in 19 orders. We found, however, that the various methods yield significantly different brain size estimates for hummingbirds (Trochilidae). For hummingbirds, fixed brain mass tends to underestimate brain size due to reduced tissue density, whereas endocranial volume overestimates brain size because it includes a larger volume than that occupied by the brain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document