scholarly journals Revisiting the consequences of deleting the X inactivation center

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (25) ◽  
pp. e2102683118
Author(s):  
Hao Yin ◽  
Chunyao Wei ◽  
Jeannie T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lines ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Counting ◽  
Xist Expression ◽  
Site Mutation ◽  
Noncoding Sequences ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
In Trans

Mammalian cells equalize X-linked dosages between the male (XY) and female (XX) sexes by silencing one X chromosome in the female sex. This process, known as “X chromosome inactivation” (XCI), requires a master switch within the X inactivation center (Xic). The Xic spans several hundred kilobases in the mouse and includes a number of regulatory noncoding genes that produce functional transcripts. Over three decades, transgenic and deletional analyses have demonstrated both the necessity and sufficiency of the Xic to induce XCI, including the steps of X chromosome counting, choice, and initiation of whole-chromosome silencing. One recent study, however, reported that deleting the noncoding sequences of the Xic surprisingly had no effect for XCI and attributed a sufficiency to drive counting to the coding gene, Rnf12/Rlim. Here, we revisit the question by creating independent Xic deletion cell lines. Multiple independent clones carrying heterozygous deletions of the Xic display an inability to up-regulate Xist expression, consistent with a counting defect. This defect is rescued by a second site mutation in Tsix occurring in trans, bypassing the defect in counting. These findings reaffirm the essential nature of noncoding Xic elements for the initiation of XCI.

Getting to the center of X-chromosome inactivation: the role of transgenesThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 30th Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Minks ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Xist Expression ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
Xist Rna ◽  
Epigenetic Phenomenon

X-chromosome inactivation is a fascinating epigenetic phenomenon that is initiated by expression of a noncoding (nc)RNA, XIST, and results in transcriptional silencing of 1 female X. The process requires a series of events that begins even before XIST expression, and culminates in an active and a silent X within the same nucleus. We will focus on the role that transgenic systems have served in the current understanding of the process of X-chromosome inactivation, both in the initial delineation of an active and inactive X, and in the function of the XIST RNA. X inactivation is strictly cis-limited; recent studies have revealed elements within the X-inactivation center, the region required for inactivation, that are critical for the initial regulation of Xist expression and chromosome pairing. It has been revealed that the X-inactivation center contains a remarkable compendium of cis-regulatory elements, ncRNAs, and trans-acting pairing regions. We review the functional componentry of the X-inactivation center and discuss experiments that helped to dissect the XIST/Xist RNA and its involvement in the establishment of facultative heterochromatin.

Regulation of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice by Tsix

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (8) ◽  
pp. 1275-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sado ◽  
Z. Wang ◽  
H. Sasaki ◽  
E. Li
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Maternal Allele ◽  
Xist Expression ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Embryonic Tissues ◽  
Early Embryonic Lethality

In mammals, X-chromosome inactivation is imprinted in the extra-embryonic lineages with paternal X chromosome being preferentially inactivated. In this study, we investigate the role of Tsix, the antisense transcript from the Xist locus, in regulation of Xist expression and X-inactivation. We show that Tsix is transcribed from two putative promoters and its transcripts are processed. Expression of Tsix is first detected in blastocysts and is imprinted with only the maternal allele transcribed. The imprinted expression of Tsix persists in the extra-embryonic tissues after implantation, but is erased in embryonic tissues. To investigate the function of Tsix in X-inactivation, we disrupted Tsix by insertion of an IRES(β)geo cassette in the second exon, which blocked transcripts from both promoters. While disruption of the paternal Tsix allele has no adverse effects on embryonic development, inheritance of a disrupted maternal allele results in ectopic Xist expression and early embryonic lethality, owing to inactivation of both X chromosomes in females and single X chromosome in males. Further, early developmental defects of female embryos with maternal transmission of Tsix mutation can be rescued by paternal inheritance of the Xist deletion. These results provide genetic evidence that Tsix plays a crucial role in maintaining Xist silencing in cis and in regulation of imprinted X-inactivation in the extra-embryonic tissues.

scholarly journals Functional Analysis of the DXPas34Locus, a 3′ Regulator of Xist Expression

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 8513-8525 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Debrand ◽  
C. Chureau ◽  
D. Arnaud ◽  
P. Avner ◽  
E. Heard
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Yeast Artificial Chromosome ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Artificial Chromosome ◽  
Antisense Transcription ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
Controlling Element

ABSTRACT X inactivation in female mammals is controlled by a key locus on the X chromosome, the X-inactivation center (Xic). The Xic controls the initiation and propagation of inactivation in cis. It also ensures that the correct number of X chromosomes undergo inactivation (counting) and determines which X chromosome becomes inactivated (choice). The Xist gene maps to the Xic region and is essential for the initiation of X inactivation in cis. Regulatory elements of X inactivation have been proposed to lie 3′ toXist. One such element, lying 15 kb downstream ofXist, is the DXPas34 locus, which was first identified as a result of its hypermethylation on the active X chromosome and the correlation of its methylation level with allelism at the X-controlling element (Xce), a locus known to affect choice. In this study, we have tested the potential function of theDXPas34 locus in Xist regulation and X-inactivation initiation by deleting it in the context of largeXist-containing yeast artificial chromosome transgenes. Deletion of DXPas34 eliminates both Xistexpression and antisense transcription present in this region in undifferentiated ES cells. It also leads to nonrandom inactivation of the deleted transgene upon differentiation. DXPas34 thus appears to be a critical regulator of Xist activity and X inactivation. The expression pattern of DXPas34 during early embryonic development, which we report here, further suggests that it could be implicated in the regulation of imprintedXist expression.

scholarly journals Mapping of DNA Replication Origins to Noncoding Genes of the X-Inactivation Center

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 3707-3717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca K. Rowntree ◽  
Jeannie T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Epigenetic Regulation ◽  
Cpg Islands ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Replication Origins ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
Dna Replication Origins ◽  
Choice Location ◽  
Tight Correlation

ABSTRACT In mammals, few DNA replication origins have been identified. Although there appears to be an association between origins and epigenetic regulation, their underlying link to monoallelic gene expression remains unclear. Here, we identify novel origins of DNA replication (ORIs) within the X-inactivation center (Xic). We analyze 86 kb of the Xic using an unbiased approach and find an unexpectedly large number of functional ORIs. Although there has been a tight correlation between ORIs and CpG islands, we find that ORIs are not restricted to CpG islands and there is no dependence on transcriptional activity. Interestingly, these ORIs colocalize to important genetic elements or genes involved in X-chromosome inactivation. One prominent ORI maps to the imprinting center and to a domain within Tsix known to be required for X-chromosome counting and choice. Location and/or activity of ORIs appear to be modulated by removal of specific Xic elements. These data provide a foundation for testing potential relationships between DNA replication and epigenetic regulation in future studies.

X Chromosome Inactivation and Imprinting

1996 ◽  
Vol 45 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
M.F. Lyon
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Xist Gene ◽  
Paternal Allele ◽  
Xist Expression ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
Genetic Imprinting

In contrast to the random inactivation of either maternal or paternal X-chromosome in the somatic cells of eutherian mammals, in marsupials the paternal X-chromosome is preferentially inactivated in all cells. Similar exclusively paternal X-inactivation occurs in two extraembryonic cell lineages of mice and rats. Thus, genetic imprinting is an important feature of X-inactivation. In embryonic development the initiation of X-inactivation is thought to occur through the X-inactivation centre, located on the X-Chromosome, and thus imprinting probably acts through this centre. A candidate gene for a role in the inactivation centre is Xist (X inactive specific transcript) which is expressed only from the inactive X-Chromosome. The expression of Xist in the mouse embryo is appropriate for it to be a cause rather than a consequence of inactivation. It appears before inactivation, and only the paternal allele is expressed in the extraembryonic lineages. In the germ cells also changes in X-chromosome activity are accompanied by changes in Xist expression. Studies of methylation of the Xist gene have shown that in male tissues where Xist is not active it is fully methylated, whereas in the female the allele on the active X-chromosome only is methylated. In male germ cells, where Xist is expressed, it is demethylated and the demethylation persists in mature spermatozoa. Thus a methylation difference in germ cells could possibly be the imprint. In androgenotes, with paternally derived chromosomes, Xist is expressed at the 4-cell stage, whereas in gynogenotes and parthenogenotes expression does not appear until the blastocyst stage. Thus, Xist expression shows imprinting. When expression appears in parthenogenotes it is random, suggesting that the imprint has been lost. The Xist gene has no open reading frame and is thought to act through mRNA but its function is unknown.

Mapping of the distal boundary of the X-inactivation center in a rearranged X chromosome from a female expressing XIST

1993 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 883-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A. Lepplg ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown ◽  
Steven L. Bressler ◽  
Karen Gustashaw ◽  
Roberta A. Pagon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
Distal Boundary

scholarly journals Clinical Epigenetic Therapies Disrupt Sex Chromosome Dosage Compensation in Human Female Cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka I. Laskowski ◽  
Danielle A. Fanslow ◽  
Erica D. Smith ◽  
Steven T. Kosak
Keyword(s):  
Small Molecule ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Dosage Compensation ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Epigenetic Mechanism ◽  
Human Female ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Inactivation Center

Sex chromosome gene dosage compensation is required to ensure equivalent levels of X-linked gene expression between males (46, XY) and females (46, XX). To achieve similar expression, X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is initiated in female cells during early stages of embryogenesis. Within each cell, either the maternal or paternal X chromosome is selected for whole chromosome transcriptional silencing, which is initiated and maintained by epigenetic and chromatin conformation mechanisms. With the emergence of small-molecule epigenetic inhibitors for the treatment of disease, such as cancer, the epigenetic mechanism underlying XCI may be inadvertently targeted. Here, we test 2 small-molecule epigenetic inhibitors being used clinically, GSK126 (a histone H3 lysine 27 methyltransferase inhibitor) and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (a histone deacetylase inhibitor), on their effects of the inactive X (Xi) in healthy human female fibroblasts. The combination of these modifiers, at subcancer therapeutic levels, leads to the inability to detect the repressive H3K27me3 modification characteristic of XCI in the majority of the cells. Importantly, genes positioned near the X-inactivation center ( Xic), where inactivation is initiated, exhibit robust expression with treatment of the inhibitors, while genes located near the distal ends of the X chromosome intriguingly exhibit significant downregulation. These results demonstrate that small-molecule epigenetic inhibitors can have profound consequences on XCI in human cells, and they underscore the importance of considering gender when developing and clinically testing small-molecule epigenetic inhibitors, in particular those that target the well-characterized mechanisms of X inactivation.

scholarly journals Conversion of random X-inactivation to imprinted X-inactivation by maternal PRC2

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clair Harris ◽  
Marissa Cloutier ◽  
Megan Trotter ◽  
Michael Hinten ◽  
Srimonta Gayen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Epigenetic Inheritance ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Human Embryos ◽  
Xist Expression ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Early Embryos ◽  
Early Human

Imprinted X-inactivation silences genes exclusively on the paternally-inherited X-chromosome and is a paradigm of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in mammals. Here, we test the role of maternal vs. zygotic Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) protein EED in orchestrating imprinted X-inactivation in mouse embryos. In maternal-null (Eedm-/-) but not zygotic-null (Eed-/-) early embryos, the maternal X-chromosome ectopically induced Xist and underwent inactivation. Eedm-/- females subsequently stochastically silenced Xist from one of the two X-chromosomes and displayed random X-inactivation. This effect was exacerbated in embryos lacking both maternal and zygotic EED (Eedmz-/-), suggesting that zygotic EED can also contribute to the onset of imprinted X-inactivation. Xist expression dynamics in Eedm-/- embryos resemble that of early human embryos, which lack oocyte-derived maternal PRC2 and only undergo random X-inactivation. Thus, expression of PRC2 in the oocyte and transmission of the gene products to the embryo may dictate the occurrence of imprinted X-inactivation in mammals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document