“Eorlas arhwate eard begeatan”

Babel ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-75
Author(s):  
Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso
Keyword(s):  
Old English ◽  
Historical Perspective ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
Heroic Poetry ◽  
Narrative Device ◽  
Poetic Inspiration ◽  
Battle Of Brunanburh ◽  
English Nationalism

The poetic insert known as <i>The Battle of Brunanburh</i> (<i>Anglo-Saxon Chronicle</i> 937) constitutes by no means one of the most interesting texts for the building of the Old English heroic geography. Its author, as Marsden states (2005: 86), “builds a sense of national destiny, using style, diction and imagery of heroic poetry”. There are many interesting issues to deal with when you want to revise how the elements Marsden quotes are used in the construction of a poem that uses history as a narrative device to build the inner story of the poem experimenting with the topics (style, diction, imagery) of heroic poetry. If the poem constitutes such a crucial text, if its emphasis is on “English nationalism” in an historical perspective rather than on individual heroics, as Marsden points out (2005: 86), it seems most evident that a careful consideration of these topics has to be made when translating the text into other languages. The aim of this article is to revisit the poem and its topics and to see how that careful consideration has been accomplished in several important English (Treharne 2004, Hamer 1970, Rodrigues 1996, Garmonsway 1953, Swanton 2000) and Spanish (Lerate & Lerate 2000, Bravo 1998, Bueno 2007) translations that consider the poem in isolation, in the context of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle or as an excuse for poetic inspiration, i.e. the case of Borges’ 1964 and 1975 poems and Tennyson’s 1880 text.

scholarly journals “Gr/edigne Gudhafoc and d/et Gr/ege Deor”: Revisiting Brunanburi’s Beasts-of Battle Topos (57-65ª) in Translation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Luis Bueno Alonso
Keyword(s):  
Translation Studies ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
Heroic Poetry ◽  
Narrative Device ◽  
Heroic Epic ◽  
Poetic Inspiration ◽  
Poetic Translation ◽  
Battle Of Brunanburh

Gr/edigne Gudhafoc and d/et Gr/ege Deor: Una revisión del tema de las Bestias de la Guerra (57-65h) en las traducciones de la Batalla de Brunanburi.La entrada correspondiente al año 937 de la Crónica Anglosajona narra los hechos que tuvieron lugar en dicha fecha mediante una interpolación poética que constituye una de las piezas más importantes de la poesía heroica del inglés antiguo: La Batalla de Brunanburh. Los versos contenidos en esta entrada son importantes pues su condición y disposición poética nos permite clasifi carlos como poesía heroica del inglés antiguo tanto en la forma (unidades métricas) como en el contenido (imaginería, dicción). Este poema, como tantos otros dentro de la literatura del inglés antiguo (Bueno 2003), usa los hechos históricos como mecanismo narrativo para construir la historia interna del poema experimentando cono los temas (estilo, dicción, imaginería) de la poesía heroica: estilo aliterativo, vocabulario formulaico, el tema de las “bestias de la guerra”, frases sacadas del corpus heroico anglosajón, etc, etc. Parece evidente que estos temas se tendrán que tener en cuenta cuidadosamente cuando se traduzca el texto a otras lenguas. En un trabajo anterior revisé tres grupos diferentes de traducciones y de traductores que consideraron el poema a) de modo aislado, b) en el contexto de la Crónica Anglosajona, y c) como excusa para la creación poética. En este artículo quiero centrarme únicamente en textos de la categoría a) y dentro de ellos analizaré exclusivamente el llamado tema de las “bestias de la guerra” (57-65a), un asunto de gran interés desde el punto de vista de los estudios en traducción poética. Este artículo tiene como objetivo revisar el poema y ver cómo se ha analizado este tema en algunas traducciones importantes, tanto al inglés (Treharne 2004, Hamer 1970, Rodrigues 1996, Crossley-Holland 1982 as revised and edited by Barber 2008) como al español (Lerate & Lerate 2000, Bravo 1998, Bueno 2007). Como complemento se discutirá de modo breve una poco conocida versión del texto en asturiano (Santori 1999).Abstract:The annal for the year 937 of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle narrates the events which took place with a poem that constitutes one of the main pieces of Anglo-Saxon heroic epic poetry: The Battle of Brunanburh. The verses contained in this annal are important because those lines fall into the rhythmical units of OE verse and have diction and imagery associated with heroic poetry. This poem, as many others in OE literature (Bueno 2003), uses history as a narrative device to build the inner story of the text experimenting with the topics (style, diction, imagery) of heroic poetry: alliterative style, formulaic vocabulary, the beasts-of-battle topos, phrases taken from the stock of the heroic corpus, etc. It seems most evident that a careful consideration of these topics has to be made when translating the text into other languages. In a previous work I revised three different groups of translations –and translators– that considered the poem a) in isolation, b) in the context of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, or c) as an excuse for poetic inspiration. In this article I want to concentrate only in texts from category a), and within them, I will exclusively revise the so-called beasts-of-battle topos (57-56a), a very interesting topic from the point of view of poetic translation studies. My aim will be then to revisit how this topos (57-65a) has been dealt with in several important English (Treharne 2004, Hamer 1970, Rodrigues 1996, Crossley-Holland 1982 as revised and edited by Barber 2008) and Spanish (Lerate & Lerate 2000, Bravo 1998, Bueno 2007) translations. As a complement, a version in Asturian (Santori 1999) will be briefl y discussed. 

Procopius’s Old English

2017 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Old English ◽  
Sixth Century ◽  
English Poetry ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
Old English Poetry ◽  
Heroic Poetry ◽  
Historical Basis

AbstractBy the middle of the sixth century, in Byzantine perspective, Britain had so long since ceased to be part of the empire of the Romans as to have become a kind of never-land, some part of the known world, but also the sort of place of which it was possible to credit the fabulous. Information was scarce. Nevertheless, the chief source for the sixth-century east-Roman regime in Constantinople, Procopius (c. 500 -565 CE), met a group of Anglo-Saxons c. 540, who were contemporaries of Beowulf’s king Hygelac; and Procopius may have learned from hoi Angiloi something about the Old English poetry, at a particularly important point in its formation, before the beginning of the conversion of the English to Christianity in 597 CE. Procopius’s English informants told him a tale (of the vengeful Anglo-Saxon bride of a Frisian basileos named Radigis) of a type consonant with later examples of Old English poetry; also, with an historical basis that coincides with the historical milieu to which the earliest Old English heroic poetry also refers, including Beowulf.

Introduction

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Jones
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Old English ◽  
English Studies ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
Political Events ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Scholarly Contribution ◽  
Anglophone World ◽  
The Relationship

This introductory chapter contextualizes the philological study of language during the nineteenth century as a branch of the evolutionary sciences. It sketches in outline the two phases of poetic Anglo-Saxonism for which the rest of the book will subsequently argue in more detail. Moreover, the relationship between Anglo-Saxonism and nineteenth-century medievalism more generally is articulated, and historical analogies are drawn between nineteenth-century Anglo-Saxonism and more recent political events in the Anglophone world. Finally, the scholarly contribution of Fossil Poetry itself is contextualized within English Studies; it is argued that ‘reception’ is one of the primary objects of Anglo-Saxon or Old English studies, and not merely a secondary object of that field’s study.

Anglo-Saxon Glosses and Grammars

2020 ◽  
pp. 942-956
Author(s):  
Patrizia Lendinara
Keyword(s):  
Old English ◽  
Anglo Saxon

This chapter surveys Old English glosses of Latin works in Anglo-Saxon manuscripts and discusses the format of glosses, the types of texts that were glossed, hermeneutic texts, merographs, dry-point glosses, glossae collectae, class glossaries, and alphabetical glossaries. The author also treats the production and study of grammar in Anglo-Saxon England, touching on the works of Bede, Tatwine, Boniface, Alcuin, Priscian, and Aelfric.

scholarly journals The northern world of the Anglo-Saxon mappa mundi

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 275-305
Author(s):  
Helen Appleton
Keyword(s):  
Old English ◽  
Urban Space ◽  
Eleventh Century ◽  
Tenth Century ◽  
Urban Spaces ◽  
British Library ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
The Mediterranean

AbstractThe Anglo-Saxon mappa mundi, sometimes known as the Cotton map or Cottoniana, is found on folio 56v of London, British Library, Cotton Tiberius B. v, which dates from the first half of the eleventh century. This unique survivor from the period presents a detailed image of the inhabited world, centred on the Mediterranean. The map’s distinctive cartography, with its emphasis on islands, seas and urban spaces, reflects an Insular, West Saxon geographic imagination. As Evelyn Edson has observed, the mappa mundi appears to be copy of an earlier, larger map. This article argues that the mappa mundi’s focus on urban space, translatio imperii and Scandinavia is reminiscent of the Old English Orosius, and that it originates from a similar milieu. The mappa mundi’s northern perspective, together with its obvious dependence on and emulation of Carolingian cartography, suggest that its lost exemplar originated in the assertive England of the earlier tenth century.

The Metrical Epilogue to the Alfredian Pastoral Care: a postscript from Junius

1995 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Lucas
Keyword(s):  
Seventeenth Century ◽  
Pastoral Care ◽  
Old English ◽  
English Studies ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
Founding Father ◽  
Germanic Studies

When Old English studies were in their infancy in the seventeenth century, scholars such as Franciscus junius (1591–1677) had very little to study in print. With no grammar and no dictionary (until Somner's in 1659) they had to teach themselves the language from original sources. Junius, whose interest in Germanic studies became active in the early 1650s, was so proficient, not only at Old English, but also at the cognate languages that he became virtually the founding-father of Germanic philology. Over the years Junius made transcripts in his own distinctive imitation-Anglo-Saxon minuscule script of many Old English texts, transcripts that have subsequently proved invaluable, especially where the original manuscripts have been damaged or lost.

scholarly journals XXI.—An Account of Researches in an Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Stowting, in Kent, during the Autumn of 1866

Archaeologia ◽  
1868 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-420
Author(s):  
John Brent
Keyword(s):  
Old English ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
The Road

The “Old English,” or Anglo-Saxon, Cemetery at Stowting had not, I believe, been systematically explored until the close of the year 1866; yet its existence was rendered probable by the discovery of antiquities about twenty-two years since, when the road abutting on the ground was lowered by the parish authorities.

The Anglian collection of royal genealogies and regnal lists

1976 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 23-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Dumville
Keyword(s):  
Old English ◽  
British Library ◽  
Anglo Saxon ◽  
Corpus Christi ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject

This collection of Old English royal records is found in four manuscripts: London, British Library, Cotton Vespasian B. vi; London, British Library, Cotton Tiberius B. v, vol. 1; Cambridge, Corpus Christi College 183; and Rochester, Cathedral Library, A. 3. 5. The present paper aims both to provide an accurate, accessible edition of the texts in the first three of these manuscripts and to discuss the development of the collection from its origin to the stages represented by the extant versions. We owe to Kenneth Sisam most of our knowledge of the history of the Anglo-Saxon genealogies. Although his closely argued discussion remains the basis for any approach to these sources, it lacks the essential aid to comprehension, the texts themselves. It is perhaps this omission, as much as the difficulty of the subject and the undoubted accuracy of many of his conclusions, that has occasioned the neglect from which the texts have suffered in recent years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document