Ex ante and ex post long-run average cost functions

1987 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1411-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. J. Hubbard ◽  
P. J. Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Ex Post ◽  
Long Run ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-104
Author(s):  
Jesse De Beer

The concept of an equity risk premium (ERP) is fundamental to modern financial theory and central to every decision at the heart of corporate finance. Efforts to quantify ERP are well rewarded by insights into the stability and dynamics of long-term investment performance. Such efforts require the quantification of both historically realised (ex post) and expected future (ex ante) premiums. Finding an appropriate proxy for the expected (ex ante) ERP remains a challenging aspect. One widely used application is the use of long-term averages of observed market premiums as a proxy for expected returns. The aim of this paper is to analyse the appropriateness of the historical methodology of estimating expected ERP in the South African context. The analysis in this paper suggests that analysing past historical figures remains useful in the SA context. This is supported by the results of the statistical analysis, showing stationarity of the ERP time-series, meaning that the true mean does not change over time. This implies that the historical average mean may be used as a proxy for the long-run expected ERP. However, the well-documented problems relating to large standard errors (predictability problem) and relevance due to changing circumstances are also evident in the SA data. Thus, investors would be well advised to analyse the past and apply informed judgments as to future differences, if any, when attempting to arrive at fair forecasts.


1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan L. McLemore ◽  
Glen Whipple ◽  
Kimberly Spielman

Considerable research has been conducted to explore economies of size in the livestock auction market industry. Since auction market cost functions are expected to conform to microeconomic theory, conclusions regarding industry economies of size are often derived from estimated long-run average total cost (LRATC) functions (French; Stoddard).


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 466-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Masera ◽  
Giancarlo Mazzoni

Purpose The paper aims to investigate whether the value of banks is affected by their financing policies. Higher capital requirements have been invoked by exploiting a renewed edition of the Modigliani–Miller (M&M) theorem. This paper shows the limits of this claim by highlighting that the general statement that “bank equity is not expensive” can be misleading. The authors argue that market prices should play an important role in bank supervision. Expectations of future profits in prices supply timely information on the viability of a bank. Design/methodology/approach The authors use the Merton model to show the inapplicability of M&M theorem to banks. The long-run viability of a bank is analyzed with a dividend discount model which allows to compare a bank’s long-term profitability with its overall cost of capital implicit in market prices. Findings The authors show that the M&M framework cannot be applied to banks neither ex-ante nor ex-post. Ex-ante the authors focus on government guarantees, ex-post they emphasize the risk-shifting phenomena that may increase the overall risk of the bank. The authors show that a bank’s stability cannot be achieved if the market expectations of its future profits stay below the cost of funding. Research limitations/implications The authors use simple analytical models. In a future study, some key peculiarities of banks, such as the monetary nature of deposits, should be analytically modelled. Practical implications The paper contributes to the debate on capital regulation on the level of capital requirements and the instruments to assess the viability/stability of banks. Originality/value This paper uses simple models to assess analytically the key issues in the debate on banks’ capital regulation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 547-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Dahlquist ◽  
Frank de Jong

AbstractThe average firm going public or issuing new equity underperforms the market in the long run. This underperformance could be related to the endogeneity of the number of new issues if new issues cluster after periods of high abnormal returns on new issues. In such a case, ex post measures of new issue abnormal returns may be negative on average, despite the absence of ex ante abnormal returns. We evaluate this endogeneity problem in event studies of long-run performance. We argue that it is unlikely that the endogeneity of the number of new issues explains the long-run underperformance of equity issues.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (13) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Álvarez ◽  
Julio Del Corral ◽  
José Antonio Pérez ◽  
Daniel Solís

This study analyzes the differences on production cost associated with the intensification of production for a sample of dairy farms in Asturias. In doing so, we account for two methodological issues which are not usually considered in the empirical literature. On the one hand, we allow for different technologies within the sample. On the other hand, we estimate ex ante cost functions, which use ‘planned output’ instead of the traditional ex post approach which uses the ‘observed output’. Our results show a positive relation between intensification and efficiency.


CFA Digest ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Ann C. Logue
Keyword(s):  
Ex Post ◽  

1993 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-138
Author(s):  
Pierre Malgrange ◽  
Silvia Mira d'Ercole
Keyword(s):  
Ex Post ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document