Mobile application to monitor inflammatory bowel disease patients on intravenous biologic treatment: a feasibility study

Author(s):  
Liselot W. van Erp ◽  
Marcel J. M. Groenen ◽  
Wendy Heida ◽  
Jolien Wisse ◽  
Britt Roosenboom ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. S73-S74
Author(s):  
Ksenia Gorbenko ◽  
Alexa Riggs ◽  
Sydney Phlegar ◽  
Brooke Koeppel ◽  
Marla Dubinsky ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. S359-S359
Author(s):  
Isabel Garrido ◽  
Susana Lopes ◽  
Maria João Cardoso ◽  
Angélica Ramos ◽  
João Tiago Guimarães ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1417-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Chen ◽  
Abraham G Hartzema ◽  
Hong Xiao ◽  
Yu-Jung Wei ◽  
Naueen Chaudhry ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims Medication persistence, defined as the time from drug initiation to discontinuation of therapy, has been suggested as a proxy for real-world therapeutic benefit and safety. This study seeks to compare the persistence of biologic drugs among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods Patients with newly diagnosed IBD were included in a retrospective study using Truven MarketScan database. Treatment persistence and switching was compared among biologic medications including infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, and vedolizumab. Predictors for discontinuation and switching were evaluated using time-dependent proportional hazard regression. Results In total, 5612 patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 3533 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were included in this analysis. Less than half of the patients continued using their initial biologic treatment after 1 year (48.48% in CD cohort; 44.78% in UC cohort). In the first year, adalimumab had the highest persistence and lowest switching rates for both CD (median survival time: 1.04 years) and UC (median survival time: 0.84 years). In subsequent years, infliximab users were more likely to persist in the use of biologic. Combination therapy with immunomodulators significantly decreased the risk of discontinuation, especially when immunomodulator therapy was started more than 30 days before the biologic (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22; CI, 0.16, 0.32). The major predictors for noncompliance included infection and hospitalization. Conclusion Overall, the persistence profiles of biologics suggest a high rate of dissatisfaction or adverse disease outcomes resulting in discontinuation and switching to a different agent. Early initiation of immunomodulators will substantially increase the persistence of biologic treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aye Aye Thi ◽  
Aula Abbara ◽  
Sonia Bouri ◽  
Simon M Collin ◽  
Paul Wolfson ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of latent tuberculosis infections (LTBI) and active TB in a cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with biologics. We also examined the effects of immunosuppressive drugs on indeterminate interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) in LTBI screening.DesignRetrospective study of patients treated with biologics between March 2007 and November 2015.SettingSt Mark’s Hospital, North West London, UK.Patients732 patients with IBD who were screened for LTBI using either tuberculin skin test or IGRA before starting a biologic treatment.MethodsRetrospective case note review of all patients with IBD who were screened for LTBI prior to initiating biologics. Patients who developed active TB were identified from the London TB register.ResultsOf 732 patients with IBD, 31 (4.2%) were diagnosed with and treated for LTBI with no significant side effects. Six of 596 patients (1.0%) who received biologic treatment developed active TB. There was a higher proportion of indeterminate IGRA in the immunosuppressive medication group compared with the non-immunosuppressive group (33% (59/181) compared with 9% (6/66), p<0.001). The combination of steroids and thiopurines had the highest proportion of indeterminate IGRA (64%, 16/25). High and low doses of steroids were equally likely to result in an indeterminate IGRA result (67% (8/12) and 57% (4/7), respectively).ConclusionsThis study highlights the challenges of LTBI screening prior to commencing biologic therapy and demonstrates the risk of TB in patients who have been screened and who are receiving prolonged and continuing doses of antitumour necrosis factor.


Author(s):  
Joana Branco Revés ◽  
Catarina Frias-Gomes ◽  
Bárbara Morão ◽  
Catarina Nascimento ◽  
Carolina Palmela ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not seem to be at increased risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2, but there is a concern whether immunosuppressive therapy may be associated with more severe disease. Several clinical practice recommendations have been published to help guide IBD care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, few studies have addressed patients’ perspectives and fears. We aimed to evaluate Portuguese IBD patients’ perspectives on the clinical management of their disease during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as well as the impact on their professional life. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An anonymous electronic survey was created using REDCap and was distributed by the Portuguese Association of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (APDI) between May and August 2020. Patients’ perspectives on immunosuppressive therapy, disease management, interaction with gastroenterology departments, and the impact of the pandemic in their professional life were assessed. Patients’ proposals to improve medical care were also evaluated. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were performed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 137 participants answered the survey (79.6% females, mean age 41.7 ± 12.1 years). Although having IBD and receiving treatment with immunosuppressors (thiopurines, steroids, or biologics) were considered promotors of anxiety, most patients (85.4%) agreed that disease remission was a priority and only a minority of patients interrupted their treatment during the pandemic. In multivariate analysis, active disease, biologic treatment, and use of corticosteroids in the last 3 months were perceived by the patients as high-risk features for increased risk of SARS-Cov-2 infection and more severe disease. Fifty-nine patients (44%) believed that their follow-up was influenced by the pandemic and only 58.8% felt that they had the opportunity to discuss their therapeutic options with their doctor. Sixty-three patients (46.0%) were working from home during the pandemic, although this decision was related to IBD and immunosuppressive therapy in only 36.5 and 39.7% of the cases, respectively. Areas where care could have been improved during the pandemic were identified by patients, namely enhancement of the communication with IBD professionals, conciliation of telemedicine with face-to-face appointments, and facilitation of the interaction between patients and employers. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Most patients agreed that maintaining IBD remission is crucial, and only a minority of the patients stopped their treatment as per their own initiative. IBD status only had a small influence on patients’ professional activity during the COVID-19 outbreak, with most changes being related to the pandemic itself.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document