A Comparison between Different Types and Frequency of Physiotherapy Treatment for Children and Adolescents with Postural Problems and Low Back Pain

Author(s):  
Neta Vitman ◽  
Devora Hellerstein ◽  
Aviva Zeev ◽  
Yael Gilo ◽  
Oren Nakdimon ◽  
...  
Spine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 550-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ohe ◽  
Teiji Kimura ◽  
Ah-Cheng Goh ◽  
Akemi Oba ◽  
Jun Takahashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1793
Author(s):  
Vanesa Abuín-Porras ◽  
Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez ◽  
Gonzalo Jaén-Crespo ◽  
Emmanuel Navarro-Flores ◽  
Helios Pareja-Galeano ◽  
...  

Introduction: Physiotherapy treatment is a common intervention for low back pain (LBP) patients. These interventions have been related to physiological effects in the central nervous system. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the effect of physiotherapy treatment in patients with LBP in the autonomic nervous system activation and subjective pain perception of patients. Methods: A total of 30 male subjects diagnosed with non-specific subacute LBP received a 50 min session consisting of (a) a manual therapy based on joint mobilization and soft tissues techniques in the lumbo-pelvic area, (b) a stretching program, and (c) motor control exercises of the core muscles. The autonomic modification of participants was assessed prior to and after the physiotherapy treatment. Results: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis reported a significant increase in average RR (p = 0.001), RMSSD (p = 0.008), LRMSSD (p = 0.001), SDNN (p = 0.005), and PNN50 (p = 0.024) after the session. Frequency-domain measures showed a significant increase in LF (p = 0.030) and HF (p = 0.014), and a decrease in LF/HF ratio (p = 0.046). A significant decrease was found in minimum HR values (p = 0.001) and average HR (p = 0.001). Moreover, maximal HR decreased its value from 116.7 ± 26.1 to 113.7 ± 40.8 after intervention. In addition, subjective pain perception (VAS scores) was significantly lower (p = 0.001) in the post-session assessment. Conclusions: Physiotherapy treatment produced an increase in parasympathetic nervous system activation and a decrease in subjective pain perception in non-specific subacute LBP patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4(SE)) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
N.T. Lethi ◽  
A.M. Moorthy

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of selected yogic practices physical exercises and physiotherapy treatment on sitting of low back pain patients. One hundred low back pain patients are taken from the Thavanur town, Kerala. The age, height and weight of the subjects ranged from 30 to 40 years, 158 to 169 centimetres and 55 to 70 kilograms respectively. The selected subjects were randomly assigned into five equal groups of 20 subjects each. Group I underwent Yogic practices, group II underwent physical exercises, group III underwent physiotherapy treatments, group IV yoga and physiotherapy treatments and group V acted as control.  Prior to and after the training the subjects were tested on sitting of low back pain patients through the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Analysis of covariance was used to determine the significantly difference existing between pretest and posttest on sitting of low back pain patients. The result of the study proved that due to twelve weeks of the experimental training was reduced back pain while sitting for the low back pain patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad M. Ardakani ◽  
Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde ◽  
Bruce F. Walker

Background. Risk factors (RFs) for the “disease” of low back pain (LBP) are probably different from the triggers of new episodes of LBP. Investigating RFs for the onset of the “disease” and the triggers of LBP is problematic if researchers fail to discern the different types of pain-free status of participants at and before baseline. There is a difference between never having had LBP and having been pain-free for a certain period only. In this review, we assessed the dependability of contemporary literature on RFs and triggers of LBP, in relation to the “disease” and the episodes, respectively.Methods. A literature search from 2010 until 2017 was performed. Information on the definitions of LBP, potential RFs/triggers, and study design was extracted. Studies were reclassified based on the type of LBP concerning the “disease,” episode, or mixed/unclear/chronic. RFs and triggers were grouped into major domains, and positive associations listed, respectively, for the “disease” and episodes.Results. In 42 of the included 47 articles, it was not clear if the authors investigated RFs for the “disease” of LBP or triggers of new episodes. Only one study properly reported RFs for the onset of the “disease” of LBP, and four studies were deemed suitable to investigate triggers for a new episode of LBP. No study reproduced the results of other included studies.Conclusion. Trustworthy information regarding RFs and triggers of LBP is rare in the current literature. Future research needs to use precise definitions of LBP (onset of the “disease” vs. episodes) and nominate the timing of the associated factors in relation to the types of LBP as these are two critical factors when studying causes of LBP.


Spine ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1132-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simo Taimela ◽  
Urho M. Kujala ◽  
Jouko J. Salminen ◽  
Tero Viljanen

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (17) ◽  
pp. E1038-E1044
Author(s):  
Elif Evrim Ekin ◽  
Muhittin Emre Altunrende

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document