Pretend play and maternal scaffolding: Comparisons of toddlers with advanced development, typical development, and hearing impairment

Roeper Review ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha J. Morelock ◽  
P. Margaret Brown ◽  
Anne‐Marie Morrissey
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Pretend Play ◽  
Typical Development ◽  
Maternal Scaffolding ◽  
Advanced Development

scholarly journals Influence of functional mobility and manual function on play in preschool children with cerebral palsy

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anaisa C Angelin ◽  
Amanda MP Sposito ◽  
Luzia I Pfeifer
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Preschool Children ◽  
Social Interaction ◽  
Pretend Play ◽  
Manual Dexterity ◽  
Functional Mobility ◽  
Typical Development ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Children With Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Development Group

Introduction This study analysed the differences in play performance between preschool children with cerebral palsy and those with typical development and investigated the factors influencing functional mobility and manual dexterity on play in children with cerebral palsy. Method Sixty preschool children (30 with cerebral palsy; 30 with typical development), were assessed by the revised Knox Preschool Play Scale, being that children with cerebral palsy were also classified according to their functional mobility and manual dexterity. Results On average, all measures were significantly smaller in the cerebral palsy group than the typical development group (p≤ .002). Manual function and functional mobility were negatively correlated with material ( r = −.456, p = .011; r = −.487, p = .006) and space ( r = −.494, p = .006; r = −.784, p = .000). Also the results pointed out a significant correlation with topography and manual function ( r = .404, p = .027) and functional mobility ( r = .718, p = .000). Pretend play and participation showed no correlation with topography (r = −.051, p = .788; r = −.312, p = .093), manual function (r = −.019, p = .921; r = −.322, p = .083) and functional mobility (r = −.085, p = .657; r = −.308, p = .097). Conclusion Play performance of children with typical development was superior to those with cerebral palsy. The degree of impairment of functional mobility and manual function negatively was negatively associated with play exploration but did not relate to pretend play or social interaction in play.

scholarly journals Teaching Sequences of Pretend Play to Children With Disabilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Barton ◽  
Gounah Choi ◽  
Evelyn G. Mauldin
Keyword(s):  
Children With Disabilities ◽  
Pretend Play ◽  
Individualized Instruction ◽  
Probe Design ◽  
Typical Development ◽  
Systematic Instruction ◽  
Response Prompting ◽  
Play Behaviors ◽  
Multiple Probe ◽  
Early Childhood Settings

Children with disabilities demonstrate fewer complex pretend play behaviors than children with typical development, which might limit their social participation in early childhood settings. A multiple-probe design was used to examine the relation between a single prompt procedure—constant time delay—and the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sequences of pretend play by children with disabilities. Results indicated systematic instruction was functionally related to increased levels of unprompted and different sequences of pretend play in all three participants. However, individual adaptations were required for two of three participants. The findings replicate previous research on adult systematic instruction using response-prompting strategies to teach pretend play and extend the literature by measuring and reporting generalized sequences of pretend play. Overall, this study supports systematic, individualized instruction using response-prompting strategies to teach sequences of pretend play to children who do not display such behaviors.

scholarly journals Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Youth With Disabilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Lobenius-Palmér ◽  
Birgitta Sjöqvist ◽  
Anita Hurtig-Wennlöf ◽  
Lars-Olov Lundqvist
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Sedentary Time ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Typical Development ◽  
Youth With Disabilities ◽  
Physically Active ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Spectrum Disorders

This study compared accelerometer-assessed habitual physical activity (PA), sedentary time, and meeting PA recommendations among 102 youth with disabilities (7–20 years) in four subgroups—physical/visual impairments, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, and hearing impairment—and 800 youth with typical development (8–16 years). Low proportions of youth with disabilities met PA recommendations, and they generally were less physically active and more sedentary than youth with typical development. The hearing impairment and autism spectrum disorder groups were the most and least physically active, respectively. Older age and to some extent female sex were related to less PA and more sedentary time. Considering the suboptimal levels of PA in youth with disabilities, effective interventions directed at factors associated with PA among them are needed.

Beyond autism: Challenging unexamined assumptions about social motivation in typical development

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Bartsch ◽  
David Estes
Keyword(s):  
Social Interest ◽  
Social Motivation ◽  
Typical Development ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
New Approaches

Abstract In challenging the assumption of autistic social uninterest, Jaswal & Akhtar have opened the door to scrutinizing similar unexamined assumptions embedded in other literatures, such as those on children's typically developing behaviors regarding others’ minds and morals. Extending skeptical analysis to other areas may reveal new approaches for evaluating competing claims regarding social interest in autistic individuals.

Hearing Aid Amplification Reduces Communication Effort of People With Hearing Impairment and Their Conversation Partners

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1299-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Beechey ◽  
Jörg M. Buchholz ◽  
Gitte Keidser
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Referential Communication ◽  
Hearing Impaired ◽  
Directional Hearing ◽  
Acoustic Environment ◽  
Communication Task ◽  
Acoustic Environments ◽  
The Impact

Objectives This study investigates the hypothesis that hearing aid amplification reduces effort within conversation for both hearing aid wearers and their communication partners. Levels of effort, in the form of speech production modifications, required to maintain successful spoken communication in a range of acoustic environments are compared to earlier reported results measured in unaided conversation conditions. Design Fifteen young adult normal-hearing participants and 15 older adult hearing-impaired participants were tested in pairs. Each pair consisted of one young normal-hearing participant and one older hearing-impaired participant. Hearing-impaired participants received directional hearing aid amplification, according to their audiogram, via a master hearing aid with gain provided according to the NAL-NL2 fitting formula. Pairs of participants were required to take part in naturalistic conversations through the use of a referential communication task. Each pair took part in five conversations, each of 5-min duration. During each conversation, participants were exposed to one of five different realistic acoustic environments presented through highly open headphones. The ordering of acoustic environments across experimental blocks was pseudorandomized. Resulting recordings of conversational speech were analyzed to determine the magnitude of speech modifications, in terms of vocal level and spectrum, produced by normal-hearing talkers as a function of both acoustic environment and the degree of high-frequency average hearing impairment of their conversation partner. Results The magnitude of spectral modifications of speech produced by normal-hearing talkers during conversations with aided hearing-impaired interlocutors was smaller than the speech modifications observed during conversations between the same pairs of participants in the absence of hearing aid amplification. Conclusions The provision of hearing aid amplification reduces the effort required to maintain communication in adverse conditions. This reduction in effort provides benefit to hearing-impaired individuals and also to the conversation partners of hearing-impaired individuals. By considering the impact of amplification on both sides of dyadic conversations, this approach contributes to an increased understanding of the likely impact of hearing impairment on everyday communication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document