Clinician–Researcher in Pediatric Cardiology: An Exploration of Domain-Specific Expertise—An Interview With Adam Dorfman

Roeper Review ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-184
Author(s):  
Don Ambrose
2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily E. Griffith

ABSTRACT Auditors are more likely to identify misstatements in complex estimates if they recognize problematic patterns among an estimate's underlying assumptions. Rich problem representations aid pattern recognition, but auditors likely have difficulty developing them given auditors' limited domain-specific expertise in this area. In two experiments, I predict and find that a relational cue in a specialist's work highlighting aggressive assumptions improves auditors' problem representations and subsequent judgments about estimates. However, this improvement only occurs when a situational factor (e.g., risk) increases auditors' epistemic motivation to incorporate the cue into their problem representations. These results suggest that auditors do not always respond to cues in specialists' work. More generally, this study highlights the role of situational factors in increasing auditors' epistemic motivation to develop rich problem representations, which contribute to high-quality audit judgments in this and other domains where pattern recognition is important.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 544-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Ward ◽  
Johann Windt ◽  
Thomas Kempton

The application of scientific principles to inform practice has become increasingly common in professional sports, with increasing numbers of sport scientists operating in this area. The authors believe that in addition to domain-specific expertise, effective sport scientists working in professional sport should be able to develop systematic analysis frameworks to enhance performance in their organization. Although statistical analysis is critical to this process, it depends on proper data collection, integration, and storage. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the opportunity for sport-science professionals to contribute beyond their domain-specific expertise and apply these principles in a business-intelligence function to support decision makers across the organization. The decision-support model aims to improve both the efficiency and the effectiveness of decisions and comprises 3 areas: data collection and organization, analytic models to drive insight, and interface and communication of information. In addition to developing frameworks for managing data systems, the authors suggest that sport scientists’ grounding in scientific thinking and statistics positions them to assist in the development of robust decision-making processes across the organization. Furthermore, sport scientists can audit the outcomes of decisions made by the organization. By tracking outcomes, a feedback loop can be established to identify the types of decisions that are being made well and the situations where poor decisions persist. The authors have proposed that sport scientists can contribute to the broader success of professional sporting organizations by promoting decision-support services that incorporate data collection, analysis, and communication.


2018 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 355-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahlem Kalaï ◽  
Corinne Amel Zayani ◽  
Ikram Amous ◽  
Wafa Abdelghani ◽  
Florence Sèdes

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-39
Author(s):  
Pooya Tabesh ◽  
Parnian Tabesh ◽  
Kaveh Moghaddam

Framing effect occurs when decision makers choose inconsistent solutions for identical problems based on the way the problems are presented to them. Despite considerable scholarly investigations in this area, the majority of existing work tends to be western-centric and systematically overlooks the characteristics of decision makers and context. Using a sample of Iranian health-care providers, this article addresses these challenges in investigation of framing effect. The results based on responses of 62 decision makers to multiple decision scenarios indicate that framing has a very strong influence on Iranian experts’ choices. Additionally, the findings show that framing interacts with decision makers’ general risk-taking propensity and domain-specific expertise to shape choice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Schlich ◽  
M. Medel Maraboli ◽  
C. Urbano ◽  
W.V. Parr

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document