Understanding changes in eating behavior during the transition to university from a self-determination theory perspective: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Myles A. Maillet ◽  
Frederick M. E. Grouzet
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Eating Behavior ◽  
Self Determination Theory ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Transition To University

Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 1444-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Vasconcellos ◽  
Philip D. Parker ◽  
Toni Hilland ◽  
Renata Cinelli ◽  
Katherine B. Owen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Determination Theory ◽  
Self Determination

scholarly journals Relación entre motivación e inteligencia emocional en Educación Física: una revisión sistemática (Relation between motivation and emotional intelligence in Physical Education: A systematic review)

Retos ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 584-589
Author(s):  
Carlos Fernández-Espínola ◽  
Bartolomé J. Almagro
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Social Factors ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Self Determination Theory ◽  
Psychological Needs ◽  
Basic Psychological Needs ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Revisión Sistemática

El objetivo de este trabajo fue realizar una revisión sistemática para conocer el estado actual del estudio de las relaciones entre los factores sociales de la teoría de metas de logro y la teoría de la autodeterminación, las necesidades psicológicas básicas y las regulaciones motivacionales, sobre la inteligencia emocional. La búsqueda se realizó en las bases de datos Web of Science, Scopus y SportDiscus. De los 62 resultados iniciales, se seleccionaron 6 artículos que cumplían los criterios de elegibilidad establecidos con anterioridad. Los resultados mostraron que la orientación de meta de aproximación-tarea, el clima tarea, la satisfacción de las necesidades psicológicas básicas y los tipos de motivación más autodeterminados se asocian de forma positiva con la inteligencia emocional. De forma opuesta, la regulación motivacional externa y la desmotivación se relacionan de forma negativa con la inteligencia emocional. Asimismo, dentro de la secuencia propuesta por la teoría de la autodeterminación, la inteligencia emocional parece comportarte como un mediador entre los antecedentes sociales y la satisfacción de los mediadores psicológicos, al mismo tiempo que parece tener un efecto directo como predictor de los diferentes tipos de regulaciones motivacionales. No obstante, son necesarios más estudios que muestren causalidad entre estas variables.Abstract. The aim of this paper was to carry out a systematic review to show the current state of research on the relationship between the social factors from the Achievement Goal Theory and the Self-Determination Theory, the basic psychological needs and motivational regulations, and emotional intelligence. The search was made in the Web of Science, Scopus, and SportDiscus databases. From the 62 initial items, we selected 6 articles that met the eligibility criteria previously established. Our findings showed that goal orientation of approach-task, task climate, satisfaction of basic psychological needs, and the most self-determined types of motivation are associated with emotional intelligence in a positive way. Conversely, external motivational regulation and amotivation are negatively related to emotional intelligence. Also, based on the sequence proposed by the Self-Determination Theory, emotional intelligence seems to behave as a mediator between social factors and satisfaction of the basic psychological needs. Furthermore, emotional intelligence seems to have a direct effect as a predictor of different types of motivational regulations. However, more studies are necessary to show causality among these variables.

scholarly journals Self-determination theory interventions versus usual care in people with diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Sophie Mathiesen ◽  
Mette Juel Rothmann ◽  
Vibeke Zoffmann ◽  
Janus Christian Jakobsen ◽  
Christian Gluud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Patient Engagement ◽  
Sequential Analysis ◽  
Self Determination Theory ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Trial Sequential Analysis

Abstract Background Existing self-management and behavioural interventions for diabetes vary widely in their content, and their sustained long-term effectiveness is uncertain. Autonomy supporting interventions may be a prerequisite to achieve ‘real life’ patient engagement and more long-term improvement through shared decision-making and collaborative goal setting. Autonomy supportive interventions aim to promote that the person with diabetes’ motivation is autonomous meaning that the person strives for goals they themselves truly believe in and value. This is the goal of self-determination theory and guided self-determination interventions. Self-determination theory has been reviewed but without assessing both benefits and harms and accounting for the risk of random errors using trial sequential analysis. The guided self-determination has not yet been systematically reviewed. The aim of this protocol is to investigate the benefits and harms of self-determination theory-based interventions versus usual care in adults with diabetes. Methods/design We will conduct the systematic review following The Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. This protocol is reported according to the PRISMA checklist. A comprehensive search will be undertaken in the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO, SCI-EXPANDED, CINAHL, SSCI, CPCI-S and CPCI-SSH to identify relevant trials. We will include randomised clinical trials assessing interventions theoretically based on guided self-determination or self-determination theory provided face-to-face or digitally by any healthcare professional in any setting. The primary outcomes will be quality of life, mortality, and serious adverse events. The secondary will be diabetes distress, depressive symptoms and adverse events not considered serious. Exploratory outcomes will be glycated haemoglobin and motivation. Outcomes will be assessed at the end of the intervention and at maximum follow-up. The analyses will be performed using Stata version 16 and trial sequential analysis. Two authors will independently screen, extract data from and perform risk of bias assessment of included studies using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Certainty of the evidence will be assessed by GRADE. Discussion Self-determination theory interventions aim to promote a more autonomous patient engagement and are commonly used. It is therefore needed to evaluate the benefit and harms according to existing trials. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020181144

scholarly journals Mindfulness and its association with varied types of motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis using Self-Determination Theory

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Donald ◽  
Emma L Bradshaw ◽  
Richard Ryan ◽  
Geetanjali Basarkod ◽  
Joseph Ciarrochi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Determination Theory ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
Controlled Motivation ◽  
Motivational States ◽  
Consistent Support ◽  
Modelling Approach

Mindfulness has been shown to have varied associations with different forms of motivation, leading to a lack of clarity as to how and when it may foster healthy motivational states. Grounded in self-determination theory, the present study proposes a theoretical model for how mindfulness supports different forms of human motivation, and then tests this via meta-analysis. A systematic review identified 89 relevant studies (N = 25,176), comprised of 104 independent datasets and 200 effect sizes. We used a three-level modelling approach to meta-analyze these data. Across both correlational and intervention studies, we found consistent support for mindfulness predicting more autonomous forms of motivation; and among correlational studies, less controlled motivation and amotivation. We conducted moderation analyses to probe heterogeneity in the effects, including bias within studies. We conclude by highlighting substantive and methodological issues that need to be addressed in future research in this area.

scholarly journals Mindfulness and Its Association With Varied Types of Motivation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using Self-Determination Theory

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 1121-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
James N. Donald ◽  
Emma L. Bradshaw ◽  
Richard M. Ryan ◽  
Geetanjali Basarkod ◽  
Joseph Ciarrochi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Determination Theory ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Methodological Issues ◽  
Controlled Motivation ◽  
Motivational States ◽  
Consistent Support

Mindfulness has been shown to have varied associations with different forms of motivation, leading to a lack of clarity as to how and when it may foster healthy motivational states. Grounded in self-determination theory, the present study proposes a theoretical model for how mindfulness supports different forms of human motivation, and then tests this via meta-analysis. A systematic review identified 89 relevant studies ( N = 25,176), comprising 104 independent data sets and 200 effect sizes. We used a three-level modeling approach to meta-analyze these data. Across both correlational and intervention studies, we found consistent support for mindfulness predicting more autonomous forms of motivation and, among correlational studies, less controlled motivation and amotivation. We conducted moderation analyses to probe heterogeneity in the effects, including bias within studies. We conclude by highlighting substantive and methodological issues that need to be addressed in future research in this area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document