Documenting and Explaining Major Field Test Results Among Undergraduate Students

2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Contreras ◽  
Frank Badua ◽  
Jiun Shiu Chen ◽  
Mitchell Adrian
2016 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Cooper Bisalski ◽  
Marilyn M. Helms ◽  
Melissa Whitesell

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Bailey ◽  
Stuart D. Foltz ◽  
Myer J. Rosenfield
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5708
Author(s):  
Bo-Ram Park ◽  
Ye-Seul Eom ◽  
Dong-Hee Choi ◽  
Dong-Hwa Kang

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outdoor PM2.5 infiltration into multifamily homes according to the building characteristics using regression models. Field test results from 23 multifamily homes were analyzed to investigate the infiltration factor and building characteristics including floor area, volume, outer surface area, building age, and airtightness. Correlation and regression analysis were then conducted to identify the building factor that is most strongly associated with the infiltration of outdoor PM2.5. The field tests revealed that the average PM2.5 infiltration factor was 0.71 (±0.19). The correlation analysis of the building characteristics and PM2.5 infiltration factor revealed that building airtightness metrics (ACH50, ELA/FA, and NL) had a statistically significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation (r = 0.70, 0.69, and 0.68, respectively) with the infiltration factor. Following the correlation analysis, a regression model for predicting PM2.5 infiltration based on the ACH50 airtightness index was proposed. The study confirmed that the outdoor-origin PM2.5 concentration in highly leaky units could be up to 1.59 times higher than that in airtight units.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Millot ◽  
F. K. Wong ◽  
D. A. Rose ◽  
T. Zhou ◽  
R. Grover ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.G. Bedrin ◽  
M.M. Khasanov ◽  
R.A. Khabibullin ◽  
V.A. Krasnov ◽  
A.A. Pashali ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huda Alqunayeer

The primary goal of the present study is to identify the problematic areas in the pronunciation of the letter “g” in English written words made by Saudi female learners of English as a foreign language, and the reasons for the weakness associated with mispronunciation of English written words which contain this letter. The population of the study was the female students (90 students) and their English language teachers (12 teachers) at the Qassim University during the academic year (2014-2015). There were two types of instruments used in this study. The first was a pronunciation test for the student participants in order to investigate the problematic areas of pronouncing “g” in different environments in different words; and the second a questionnaire for the teacher participants to provide comprehensive data about the causes of these errors of pronouncing “g” committed by EFL female students at Qassim University. Ninety female students were included for the pronunciation test and 12 teachers were asked to answer the questionnaire. Simple percentage was used for analyzing the data of recording words (pronunciation test). Results of the students’ recording words revealed that the participants mispronounced “g” before nasals (68%). According to the results of the teachers’ responses to the questionnaire suggested many factors that can cause difficulties for students in terms of pronouncing “g” in English written words. According to them, these difficulties are concerned with reading difficulties, nonstandard spellings, letters that follow “g” (many of them may become combinations), loan words, orthography (no correspondence between the English alphabets and their sounds). The researcher offers recommendations that might help teachers and students to overcome and reduce these mispronunciations of this letter in English written words.


2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 736 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. A. Lee ◽  
S. C. Soderholm ◽  
M. M. Flemmer ◽  
J. L. Hornsby-Myers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document