Multilevel Effects of Student and Classroom Factors on Elementary Science Achievement in Five Countries

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1337-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibel Kaya ◽  
Diana C. Rice
AERA Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 233285841986108 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Chris Curran ◽  
James Kitchin

Recent evidence points to the early elementary grades as a pivotal point for the development of science learning trajectories and achievement gaps. Using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, this study estimates the degree to which time spent on science and the breadth of science topics/skills covered predict science achievement in the earliest grades of elementary school. Using regression along with school fixed effects and student fixed effects models, we find suggestive evidence in some models (student fixed effects and regression with observable controls) that time on science instruction is related to science achievement but little evidence that the number of science topics/skills covered are related to greater science achievement. These results are generally consistent across student subgroups. We discuss the implications for early science policy and practice.


1980 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh Burstein ◽  
Kathleen B. Fischer ◽  
M. David Miller

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Thomas ◽  
Kamden K Strunk

This longitudinal study explored the ways parents’ and teachers’ expectancy for success influences 3rd – 5th children’s expectancy for success and achievement in science. Guided by an open-systems perspective and functional (Ballantine & Roberts, 2007) and expectancy-value (Eccles, 2005; Eccles, 2007) theories, we focused on school related socialization processes and the role of parents and teachers in shaping children’s abilities and skills. Participants included 153 children from 23 rural, Oklahoma schools and provided matched sets of parent, teacher, and child surveys. Weisgram and Bigler’s (2006) science self-efficacy subscale organized survey items where wording changes allowed parallel parent and teacher versions of the scale. Achievement was determined by test scores on the state-administered Oklahoma Core Curriculum Tests (OCCT). Results showed teachers’ expectancy for children’s success in science did not significantly predict students’ fifth grade science achievement. However, regression analyses showed parents’ expectancy did predict students’ fifth grade science achievement. The relationship was statistically significant and explained about 19% of the variance in fifth grade science achievement test scores (R2 = .19). We further determined that children’s science self-efficacy significantly influenced science achievement scores (β = .20) (however this was a far weaker influence than the direct effect of parents’ expectancy (β = .38) of children’s success in science). The novel finding is that parents have an influence on children’s achievement over and above children’s own self-efficacy beliefs about science. Clearly, parents matter when it comes to science achievement. Though it seems parents are more influential than teachers when it comes to children’s own expectations and achievement success in elementary science, we encourage further consideration of parent expectancy as it relates to child ability and achievement, modified classroom strategies, and home-school relations to better align teachers’ positive influence on children’s expectancy for success.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document