Performance analysis of advanced decision tree-based ensemble learning algorithms for landslide susceptibility mapping

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emrehan Kutlug Sahin ◽  
Ismail Colkesen
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phuong Thao Thi Ngo ◽  
Mahdi Panahi ◽  
Khabat Khosravi ◽  
Omid Ghorbanzadeh ◽  
Narges Kariminejad ◽  
...  

CATENA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 399-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoyuan Hong ◽  
Junzhi Liu ◽  
Dieu Tien Bui ◽  
Biswajeet Pradhan ◽  
Tri Dev Acharya ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shibao Wang ◽  
Jianqi Zhuang ◽  
Jia Zheng ◽  
Hongyu Fan ◽  
Jiaxu Kong ◽  
...  

Landslides are widely distributed worldwide and often result in tremendous casualties and economic losses, especially in the Loess Plateau of China. Taking Wuqi County in the hinterland of the Loess Plateau as the research area, using Bayesian hyperparameters to optimize random forest and extreme gradient boosting decision trees model for landslide susceptibility mapping, and the two optimized models are compared. In addition, 14 landslide influencing factors are selected, and 734 landslides are obtained according to field investigation and reports from literals. The landslides were randomly divided into training data (70%) and validation data (30%). The hyperparameters of the random forest and extreme gradient boosting decision tree models were optimized using a Bayesian algorithm, and then the optimal hyperparameters are selected for landslide susceptibility mapping. Both models were evaluated and compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve and confusion matrix. The results show that the AUC validation data of the Bayesian optimized random forest and extreme gradient boosting decision tree model are 0.88 and 0.86, respectively, which showed an improvement of 4 and 3%, indicating that the prediction performance of the two models has been improved. However, the random forest model has a higher predictive ability than the extreme gradient boosting decision tree model. Thus, hyperparameter optimization is of great significance in the improvement of the prediction accuracy of the model. Therefore, the optimized model can generate a high-quality landslide susceptibility map.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahareh Kalantar ◽  
Naonori Ueda ◽  
Vahideh Saeidi ◽  
Kourosh Ahmadi ◽  
Alfian Abdul Halin ◽  
...  

Predicting landslide occurrences can be difficult. However, failure to do so can be catastrophic, causing unwanted tragedies such as property damage, community displacement, and human casualties. Research into landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) attempts to alleviate such catastrophes through the identification of landslide prone areas. Computational modelling techniques have been successful in related disaster scenarios, which motivate this work to explore such modelling for LSM. In this research, the potential of supervised machine learning and ensemble learning is investigated. Firstly, the Flexible Discriminant Analysis (FDA) supervised learning algorithm is trained for LSM and compared against other algorithms that have been widely used for the same purpose, namely Generalized Logistic Models (GLM), Boosted Regression Trees (BRT or GBM), and Random Forest (RF). Next, an ensemble model consisting of all four algorithms is implemented to examine possible performance improvements. The dataset used to train and test all the algorithms consists of a landslide inventory map of 227 landslide locations. From these sources, 13 conditioning factors are extracted to be used in the models. Experimental evaluations are made based on True Skill Statistic (TSS), the Receiver Operation characteristic (ROC) curve and kappa index. The results show that the best TSS (0.6986), ROC (0.904) and kappa (0.6915) were obtained by the ensemble model. FDA on its own seems effective at modelling landslide susceptibility from multiple data sources, with performance comparable to GLM. However, it slightly underperforms when compared to GBM (BRT) and RF. RF seems most capable compared to GBM, GLM, and FDA, when dealing with all conditioning factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document