scholarly journals A Comparative Analysis of Required Financial Disclosures in US, UK and International Accounting Standards

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-253
Author(s):  
Niamh Brennan ◽  
Claire L. Marston
Author(s):  
Hana Bohušová

Two most significant organizations in the field of financial reporting regulation setters in the world – the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) have recognized that in order international capital markets to function properly, a single set of high-quality international accounting standards designed especially for listed companies around the world must exist. The effort should be especially aimed at spreading the IFRS around the world and the FASB – IASB Convergence. The most significant difference between the US GAAP and IFRSs is in the area of the general approach. The IFRSs are based on basic accounting principles with limited application guidance, US GAAPs are based especially on rules with specific application guidance. The main objective of this work is to assist in the development of an improved common conceptual framework that provides a sound foundation for developing future accounting standards.The structure of the paper is divided into three parts. The theoretical background presents the historical development of the IAS/IFRS and US GAAP convergence efforts in general. The second part of the paper is aimed at the comparative analysis of conceptual frameworks (the IAS/IFRS and US GAAP). At the end, based on the results of the comparative analysis, the basic principles for a common conceptual framework, which should be applicable, are clarified. The paper uses the standard methods of scientific work. Firstly, the method of description is used to describe the development in the area of IAS/IFRS and US GAAP convergence. Then, a comparative analysis is used to discuss the differences in the position a principles of conceptual frameworks the IAS/IFRS and US GAAP. At the end the method of synthesis, deduction and induction is used.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novi Kurniawati

<p><em>Globalization brings changes to the capital markets and business operations across borders. State sector in a multinational company is required to make financial reports that can be received throughout the world, but in every country have their own accounting standards are of course different between a country's accounting standards with other countries. For it requires the international accounting standards, so that financial disclosures made by a company in a country multinational globally acceptable. Application of international accounting standards is very difficult because of differences in both legal, environmental, social and economic conditions between one country to another and to bridge it then requires the process of harmonization and convergence. There is a difference between the process of harmonization and convergence of international accounting standards. Only at the stage of harmonization, alignment of accounting standards issued by standard-setting bodies in each country with International Accounting Standard (IAS), while convergence is the next stage of the harmonization of accounting standards which are expected in the context of international standards aimed at eventually there would be only one standard. The process of harmonization and convergence of international accounting standards is not easy to just run, many obstacles and criticisms of the process of harmonization and convergence in which the harmonization and convergence is only suitable for large companies are multinational companies rather than small and medium enterprises, although there are also advantages that can be obtained from the harmonization and convergence of international accounting standards, among others comparable financial reporting, increase transparency, reduce costs and increase global investment capital. </em></p> <p><em> </em></p> <p><strong><em></em></strong><em></em></p>


Author(s):  
Olena Koba ◽  
Yuliia Myronova ◽  
Ilona Siroshtan

The article deals with the order of formation of information and reflection of operations on accounting of obligations of the enterprise in accordance with the norms of national and international accounting standards. The comparative analysis of normative documents in the context of the interpretation of the essence, recognition and classification of obligations of the enterprise is carried out. The common and distinctive features of the method of accounting for the given object are established.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document