Is there a correct way of establishing sustainability indicators? The case of sustainability indicator development on the Island of Guernsey

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Mcalpine ◽  
Andrew Birnie
2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 223 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Freebairn ◽  
C. A. King

A variety of indicators have been developed and applied by farmers and scientists for the northern cereal belt. A general overview is presented of 'What are we trying to monitor?' followed by some example concepts; erosion hazard, salinity hazard, nutrient balance, production efficiency and participatory learning. These examples illustrate the complexity of indicator application and their dependence on context, purpose and scale. Emphasis is given to providing a rationale for developing indicators that focus on 'soft' system status (e.g. behaviour) as well as 'hard' system status. The propositions put forward are that indicators need to be integrated with the development of improved management systems, and that land managers (and community) as a collective, are key to this process. Some frequently asked questions about indicator development and application are responded to. Some 'Indicators for Indicators' that we have found useful in aiding indicator development, particularly in participatory fora are presented.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewald Rametsteiner ◽  
Helga Pülzl ◽  
Johanna Alkan-Olsson ◽  
Pia Frederiksen

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-43
Author(s):  
Alexandre Alcantara Mesquita ◽  
Renato Penha ◽  
Claudia Terezinha Kniess ◽  
Tina Travis

Purpose - To understand the relationship between sustainability indicators and information technology projects.Design/methodology/approach – This is an exploratory study with a qualitative approach of multiple cases involving service providers in the information technology sector.Findings – It was found that companies use sustainability indicators at an organizational level for management of information technology projects, but no specific sustainability indicator was present in none of the cases. Thus, the use of sustainability indicators depends on the nature of the information technology project.Research limitations/implications - This study is limited to the identification of sustainability indicators in information technology companies.Originality/value - Although this study points to the effectiveness of the use of sustainability indicators in projects, there is still a gap for performing new studies on information technology projects with the objective of increasing the companies’ economic performance.


10.1068/d72j ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Rydin

There has been much interest in the neo-Foucauldian framework of governmentality as a way of understanding contemporary policy processes. In this paper I examine evidence from a case study of local sustainability indicators in the light of this framework. The role of indicators as a potential governmental technology is addressed, covering issues of their ability to objectify sustainability the scope for altered subjectivities, their positioning within central–local government relations, and the construction and responsibilisation of communities, particularly in urban regeneration contexts. I conclude that the use of indicators at the community level may tell us more about central–local relations within contemporary governance than about the construction of subjects and objects to enable governance with regard to sustainable development.


2013 ◽  
pp. 1313-1330
Author(s):  
Jude Talbot ◽  
Ray Venkataraman

The concept of balancing people, planet, and profit to maximize the absolute value of an enterprise is known as sustainability. It is concerned with the economic, social, and environmental effects of an enterprise in the long term. However, in practice, this definition does not provide companies with a meaningful framework to integrate sustainability into their projects, which by definition are one-off endeavors. Given this divide between the long-term nature of sustainability and the temporary nature of projects, companies have found it difficult to incorporate relevant sustainability indicators into project baselines. In this chapter, the authors examine a methodology for integrating sustainability into project baselines for consultants in the industrial and resource extraction fields. The methodology is comprised of an indicator set and a procedure for using the indicator set. This chapter’s goal is to help standardize the sustainability process, making it easier to implement and more mainstream. The objectives of this chapter are: (1) identify different sustainability indicator sets and their strengths and weaknesses; (2) explain what a multi-level analytical hierarchy project is and why it is important to integrating sustainability into such projects; and (3) state the steps in a procedure to integrate sustainability into project baselines.


Author(s):  
Velmurugan Ashokkumar ◽  
Sivakumar Palaniappan ◽  
Aarthipriya Venkataraman

2000 ◽  
Vol 151 (12) ◽  
pp. 472-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Kissling-Näf

A group of international experts evaluated whether the aims and instruments of Swiss forest policy are suitable for the promotion of sustainable forest management based on the pan-European criteria. Approach and main results are presented as well as the method developed for the definition of sustainability indicators as an instrument for the evaluation of sectoral policies and the possibility of a transfer of methods and indicators on an international level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document