Influence of pedestrian head surrogate and boundary conditions on head injury risk prediction

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Tinard ◽  
C. Deck ◽  
F. Meyer ◽  
N. Bourdet ◽  
R. Willinger
Author(s):  
H Beles ◽  
B A Tolea ◽  
G F Crisan ◽  
C A Dogar ◽  
V V Ciotachiev
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Chimba Mkandawire ◽  
Eric S. Winkel ◽  
Nicholas A. White ◽  
Edward Schatz

Operators of personal watercraft (PWC) can perform maneuvers that may result in riders separating from the moving watercraft; the tested hypothesis was whether substantial brain injury concurrent with substantial facial and skull fractures can occur from contact with the PWC during a fall. The present study reports the potential for AIS2+ facial/skull fractures and AIS2+ traumatic brain injury (TBI) during a generic fall from the PWC in the absence of wave-jumping or other aggressive maneuvers. While it is well known that PWC can be used for wave-jumping which can result in more severe impacts, such impacts are beyond the scope of the present study because of the wide variability in occupant and PWC kinematics and possible impact velocities and orientations. Passenger separation and fall kinematics from both seated and standing positions were analyzed to estimate head impact velocities and possible impact locations on the PWC. A special purpose headform, known as the Facial and Ocular CountermeasUre Safety (FOCUS) device was used to evaluate the potential for facial fractures, skull fractures and TBI. Impacts between the FOCUS headform and the PWC were performed at velocities of 8, 10, and 12 miles per hour at 5 locations near the stern of a PWC. This study reports impact forces for various facial areas, linear and angular head accelerations, and Head Injury Criteria (HIC). The risk for facial fracture and TBI are reported herein. The results of this study indicate that concurrent AIS2 facial fractures, AIS2+ skull fractures, and AIS2+ TBI do not occur during a simple fall from a PWC.


2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukasz Oleksy ◽  
Anna Mika ◽  
Renata Kielnar ◽  
Błazej Pruszczynski

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (06) ◽  
pp. 2050035
Author(s):  
ZHENG TAN ◽  
YINGFU GUO ◽  
GUIBING LI ◽  
LINGBO YAN

Accident data show that lower limb is one of the most frequently injured body parts for cyclists in vehicle collisions. However, studies of cyclist lower limb injuries and protection are still sparse. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the kinematics and injury mechanism of cyclist lower limb in vehicle-to-bicycle collisions considering different impact boundary conditions. To achieve this, the finite element (FE) modeling approach and an FE human body lower limb model with detailed muscles were employed, and impact boundary conditions with different vehicle front-end shapes and cycling postures were considered. Predictions of lower limb kinematics, knee ligament elongation and bending moment of upper and lower leg were used for analysis. The simulation results show that cycling posture has a significant influence on cyclist lower limb kinematics and injury risk, lateral bending toward the direction of vehicle or vehicle moving combining with lateral shearing is the main mechanism for cyclist knee ligament injuries, and injuries to long bones of cyclist leg in vehicle impacts could form lateral bending at both directions. The findings suggest that the influence of cycling posture and distinct difference in injury mechanism between cyclist and pedestrian should be considered in the assessment of vehicle safety design for cyclist lower limb protection.


2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 222-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Bartsch ◽  
Edward Benzel ◽  
Vincent Miele ◽  
Vikas Prakash

Object Concussion is the signature American football injury of the 21st century. Modern varsity helmets, as compared with vintage leather helmets, or “leatherheads,” are widely believed to universally improve protection by reducing head impact doses and head injury risk for the 3 million young football players in the US. The object of this study was to compare the head impact doses and injury risks with 11 widely used 21st century varsity helmets and 2 early 20th century leatherheads and to hypothesize what the results might mean for children wearing similar varsity helmets. Methods In an injury biomechanics laboratory, the authors conducted front, oblique front, lateral, oblique rear, and rear head impact tests at 5.0 m/second using helmeted headforms, inducing near- and subconcussive head impact doses on par with approximately the 95th percentile of on-field collision severity. They also calculated impact dose injury risk parameters common to laboratory and on-field traumatic neuromechanics: linear acceleration, angular acceleration, angular velocity, Gadd Severity Index, diffuse axonal injury, acute subdural hematoma, and brain contusion. Results In many instances the head impact doses and head injury risks while wearing vintage leatherheads were comparable to or better than those while wearing several widely used 21st century varsity helmets. Conclusions The authors do not advocate reverting to leather headgear, but they do strongly recommend, especially for young players, instituting helmet safety designs and testing standards, which encourage the minimization of linear and angular impact doses and injury risks in near- and subconcussive head impacts.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 463-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley A. Weaver ◽  
Sarah M. Stitzel ◽  
Joel D. Stitzel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document