Errorless learning and spaced retrieval: How do these methods fare in healthy and clinical populations?

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 432-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Haslam ◽  
Kathryn I. Hodder ◽  
Philip J. Yates
Author(s):  
Nancy Paul ◽  
Joni Mehrhoff

Results of a survey made available to SIG 2 and SIG 15 affiliates via the SIG listservs revealed information on direct and indirect interventions utilized for persons with dementia-based communication disorders. Fifty-eight practicing speech-language pathologists (SLPs) participated and reported using the following direct interventions most frequently: specific verbal instruction, cognitive stimulation, memory wallet, spaced retrieval, and errorless learning. The overwhelming majority of participants utilized caregiver training as the most frequent indirect technique. Barriers and facilitators to providing intervention for persons with dementia-related communication disorders were identified.


2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Clare ◽  
Barbara A. Wilson

Summary: Errorless learning (EL) can be supported through a variety of specific learning methods, which may vary along other parameters including for example the degree of effortful processing required. In memory rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD), achieving the optimal balance between elimination of errors and active, effortful processing during learning is likely to be critical. This paper describes a comparison of four different errorless methods in a single case experimental design. The participant, who had a diagnosis of early-stage AD, attempted to relearn forgotten face-name associations using one of four methods: Spaced retrieval, mnemonic elaboration, cueing with increasing assistance, and cueing with decreasing assistance. Best results were achieved in the mnemonic and cueing with increasing assistance conditions, while cueing with decreasing assistance produced the least learning. It is suggested that, within an errorless learning paradigm, strategies requiring more effortful processing may produce superior gains compared to strategies relying on implicit or passive processing. This has important implications for clinical rehabilitation interventions for people with early-stage dementia.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua-Shan Wu ◽  
Li-Chan Lin ◽  
Shu-Chun Su ◽  
Shiao-Chi Wu

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Hinckley

Abstract A patient with aphasia that is uncomplicated by other cognitive abilities will usually show a primary impairment of language. The frequency of additional cognitive impairments associated with cerebrovascular disease, multiple (silent or diagnosed) infarcts, or dementia increases with age and can complicate a single focal lesion that produces aphasia. The typical cognitive profiles of vascular dementia or dementia due to cerebrovascular disease may differ from the cognitive profile of patients with Alzheimer's dementia. In order to complete effective treatment selection, clinicians must know the cognitive profile of the patient and choose treatments accordingly. When attention, memory, and executive function are relatively preserved, strategy-based and conversation-based interventions provide the best choices to target personally relevant communication abilities. Examples of treatments in this category include PACE and Response Elaboration Training. When patients with aphasia have co-occurring episodic memory or executive function impairments, treatments that rely less on these abilities should be selected. Examples of treatments that fit these selection criteria include spaced retrieval and errorless learning. Finally, training caregivers in the use of supportive communication strategies is helpful to patients with aphasia, with or without additional cognitive complications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris A. M. Smits ◽  
Meinou H. C. Theunissen ◽  
Sijmen A. Reijneveld ◽  
Maaike H. Nauta ◽  
Marieke E. Timmerman

Abstract. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a popular screening instrument for the detection of social-emotional and behavioral problems in children in community and clinical settings. To sensibly compare SDQ scores across these settings, the SDQ should measure psychosocial difficulties and strengths in the same way across community and clinical populations, that is, the SDQ should be measurement invariant across both populations. We examined whether measurement invariance of the parent version of the SDQ holds using data from a community sample (N = 707) and a clinical sample (N = 931). The results of our analysis suggest that measurement invariance of the SDQ parent version across community and clinical populations is tenable, implying that one can compare the SDQ scores of children across these populations. This is a favorable result since it is common clinical practice to interpret the scores of a clinical individual relative to norm scores that are based on community samples. The findings of this study support the continued use of the parent version of the SDQ in community and clinical settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document