scholarly journals Contributions of representational distinctiveness and stability to memory performance and age differences

Author(s):  
Verena R. Sommer ◽  
Myriam C. Sander
1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia P. May ◽  
Lynn Hasher ◽  
Ellen R. Stoltzfus

Across two studies comparing younger and older adults, age differences in optimal performance periods were identified (Study 1), and then shown to be an important determinant of memory differences (Study 2). A norming study showed that while most younger adults were Evening or Neutral types, as determined by a standard questionnaire, the vast majority of older adults were Morning types. A second study compared the recognition performance of younger and older adults tested in the morning or in the late afternoon. Substantial age differences were found in the late afternoon, when younger but not older adults were at their optimal times. However, no age differences in memory performance were found in the morning, when older but not younger adults were at their peak period. Thus, synchrony between optimal performance periods and the time at which testing is conducted may well be a critical variable in determining group differences in intellectual performance, particularly between older and younger adults.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Scarampi ◽  
Matthias Kliegel

The present study investigated age differences in the ability to predict prospective memory (PM) performance. A sample of younger (N = 88) and older (N = 88) participants completed an event-based PM task embedded in an ongoing task. Metamemory was measured by asking participants to predict their performance before completing the PM task and complete some questionnaires on self-perceptions of everyday memory ability. We manipulated A) the reference point used to evaluate performance and B) the order of presentation of the instruments. One group of participants predicted their upcoming performance with a general confidence rating (performance condition) whereas a different group predicted their performance in comparison to other people of their age (peers condition). The metamemory questionnaires were completed either at the beginning of the experimental session or after the PM task, in a counterbalanced order. In terms of performance, we did not observe age differences in PM. In terms of metamemory, younger and older participants were similarly underconfident in the performance condition and overconfident in the peers condition. Moreover, older adults reported significantly better PM abilities than younger adults, and participants generally reported more memory failures when the metamemory questionnaires were administered after the PM task and in the performance condition. These findings show that both younger and older adults have limited metacognitive insights, and point to reactive effects of metamemory to metacognitive reference point and order of administration of the instruments.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yana Fandakova ◽  
Myriam C. Sander ◽  
Markus Werkle-Bergner ◽  
Yee Lee Shing

Author(s):  
Vanesa Hidalgo ◽  
◽  
Matias M. Pulopulos ◽  
Teresa Montoliu ◽  
Isabel Crespo-Sanmiguel ◽  
...  

"In the last decades, there has been a growing interest in knowing the effects of acute stress on memory performance, particularly declarative memory. Research on this topic suggests that age is a crucial individual factor to consider in the stress-memory link. However, most of the evidence has been obtained from studies conducted in young people and, surprisingly, studies in older people are scarce. Thus, our aim was to investigate the age differences in the acute stress effects on declarative memory performance. To do this, we directly compared the effects of a psychosocial acute stressor (i.e. Trier Social Stress Test) on learning, consolidation and memory retrieval performance in two age groups (young: 18-35 years vs. 54- 78 years). As expected, worse memory performance was associated with age. Overall, stress did not affect learning, consolidation and memory retrieval performance in older people. However, stress caused greater interference in the older people’s memory performance than a control task, but this result was not found in young people. In addition, stress impaired retrieval performance in young men but not in older people. Our results suggest that age moderates the stress-induced effects on declarative memory. In addition, they support the idea that older people could be less sensitive to acute stress effects on memory probably due to an age-related reduction of the sensitivity and density of the glucocorticoid receptors and a decrease in the functional amygdala and hippocampus interconnectivity."


1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Bäckman ◽  
Lars-Göran Nilsson

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nichole Lighthall ◽  
Lindsay Conner ◽  
Kelly Sullivan Giovanello

Human memory consists of distinct learning and memory systems, each contributing in unique ways to the acquisition, retention, and subsequent retrieval of information. This chapter focuses on age-related changes to long-term declarative (episodic and semantic memory) and nondeclarative (priming, classical conditioning, procedural and reinforcement learning) systems. Although these systems exhibit considerable independence in processing characteristics and neural underpinnings, accumulating evidence points to interactions between systems, which may increase observable age differences in learning and memory performance. Thus, while this chapter largely highlights age effects within traditional memory-system boundaries, a frontier in aging research is emerging at their intersections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document