Family-friendly policies and women's wages – is there a trade-off? Skill investments, occupational segregation and the gender pay gap in Germany, Sweden and the UK

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Grönlund ◽  
Charlotta Magnusson

This chapter aims to: give a clear understanding of gendered occupational segregation; demonstrate why it is an important issue for women today especially in terms of the persistent gender pay gap; discuss both horizontal and vertical segregation and how this impacts women in terms of pay, promotion, opportunities and society, through a lack of utilizing the whole of society’s workforce; and discuss men who work in female dominated industries and how men can benefit by their minority status, with an emphasis on the teaching profession. To give the reader a deeper and richer understanding of gendered occupational segregation outside of the SET sector, this chapter focuses on the UK’s finance sector. This sector is a particularly relevant and interesting sector to add to the discussions, as in both the UK and the USA, women hold an approximately equal percentage of the workforce as a whole, yet they are concentrated in the low paying, less prestigious jobs, and at the lower echelons of the sector.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-324
Author(s):  
Moshe Semyonov

This paper focuses on the relations between development and gender disparities in labor market outcomes in the era of globalization. Within a cross-national comparative framework, the article examines the relations between development and globalization and three aspects of gender-linked disparities (women's labor force participation, gender occupational differentiation, and gender pay gap) at two time points: 1990 and 2015. The data reveal patterns in the relationship between development, globalization, and each dimension of gender inequality. First, development but not globalization tends to increase women's labor force participation. Second, development is likely to reduce gender occupational segregation. But the effect is indirect; it is transmitted via the increased number of economically active women. Third, less gender occupational segregation does not necessarily mean greater occupational equality; high female labor force participation is likely to reduce women's likelihood of employment in high-status professional and managerial occupations. Fourth, gender occupational inequality appears to be one of the sources of a country's gender pay gap; the pay disparity between men and women tends to be greater in countries where gender occupational inequality is high. A model that summarizes the complex relations among development, globalization, and the various dimensions of gender-linked economic activity and inequality is proposed and discussed.


Author(s):  
Hazel Conley ◽  
Geraldine Healy ◽  
Pedro Martins ◽  
Stella Warren
Keyword(s):  
Pay Gap ◽  

Author(s):  
David Cabrelli

This chapter examines the principle of equal pay for equal work enshrined in the Equality Act 2010 (EA). It first considers the stubbornness of the gender pay gap in the UK and the EU, as well as the justifications for intervention in the labour market via the auspices of equal pay laws. It goes on to discuss the legal machinery in the EA, which confers an entitlement on employees of one sex to the same remuneration as suitable employee comparators of the opposite sex. The focus then turns to the content of the ‘sex equality clause’—a term imposed into every employee’s contract of employment by virtue of section 66 of the EA. This is followed by a discussion of the material factor defence for employers in section 69 of the EA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Louise Jewell ◽  
Giovanni Razzu ◽  
Carl Singleton
Keyword(s):  
Pay Gap ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Jones ◽  
Gerry Makepeace ◽  
Victoria Wass

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damian Grimshaw ◽  
Gillian Whitehouse ◽  
Di Zetlin
Keyword(s):  
Pay Gap ◽  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danula Daksith Kankanam Gamage ◽  
Georgios Kavetsos ◽  
Sushanta Mallick ◽  
Almudena Sevilla
Keyword(s):  
Pay Gap ◽  

Author(s):  
Hazel Conley ◽  
Alberto Mattei ◽  
Urszula Torbus ◽  
Joanna Nowakowska-Małusecka
Keyword(s):  
Pay Gap ◽  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Campbell ◽  
Ailsa Mckay ◽  
Emily Thomson

Despite the fact that some sectors of industry are facing major skills shortages, the Scottish labour market continues to be characterised by occupational segregation and a large disparity between the wages of women and men. The concentration of individuals in occupations and training based on their gender effectively restricts the pool of potential recruits to industry and is unlikely to make the best use of human capital. Moreover, it obstructs the pursuit of gender equality by reinforcing the gender pay gap and restricting individual career choices. This paper reports on the government's flagship training policy, the Modern Apprenticeship programme, from a gender perspective. It concludes that, ten years on from its introduction, the scheme represents something of a ‘missed opportunity’ to tackle occupational segregation and its deleterious effects in the wider economy and in society at large. It is recommended that the government and organisations involved in the development and delivery of Modern Apprenticeships adopt a more conscious and cohesive approach to promoting non-traditional choices at the vocational level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document