scholarly journals Talent management: a critical literature review and research agenda for public sector human resource management

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-95
Author(s):  
Foteini Kravariti ◽  
Karen Johnston
Author(s):  
Muhammad SHOAIB ◽  
Roman ZÁMEČNÍK ◽  
Zuhair ABBAS ◽  
Mohsin JAVED ◽  
Asad Ur REHMAN

Purpose – green human resource management (GHRM) and green human capital (GHC) are relatively over- looked aspects in the existing literature of human resource management. Keeping in view, this systematic literature review attempts to highlight and explore its related avenues in the fresh domains of GHRM-GHC and provide a future research agenda for the development of knowledge. Research methodology – this study employs a systematic literature review methodology. The review analyses 25 studies especially focused on secondary data of peer-reviewed articles published in academic journals from 2008 to 2020. Findings – this study demonstrated that green HRM is imperative for the implementation of environmental sustain- ability. More importantly, green human capital is considered an important strategic tool for HR managers and policy makers for devising human resource policies. Research limitations – this study only focus on articles reported in high-quality research journals. However, other scholarly materials, such as books and conference articles have not been included in the review analyses. Practical implications – this study provides guidelines to policymakers and managers to pay attention towards environ- mental sustainability and future research agenda to carry out analytical and empirical research. Originality/Value – this study enhances the body of knowledge on GHRM field. This study provides a pathway for scholars to explore the emerging areas of human resource management such as green intellectual capital and green human capital to achieve sustainable development and competitive advantage.


Nursing Forum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joko Gunawan ◽  
Yupin Aungsuroch ◽  
Mary L. Fisher

Author(s):  
Alexander RODRÍGUEZ LÓPEZ ◽  
Nekane BALLUERKA LASA ◽  
Arantxa GOROSTIAGA MANTEROLA ◽  
Imanol ULACIA ARAMENDI

Laburpena: Jardun moldagarria funtsezkoa da erakundeentzat, inguruneko eskaeretara egokitzeko gaitasuna ezinbestekoa delako, batez ere krisi-garaian edo aldaketa teknologiko, ekonomiko edo laboralen garaian. Artikulu honek jardun moldagarria kontzeptuaren berrikuspen teorikoa ematen du, bai eta beste konstruktuekin eta antolaketa-elementuekin duen harremanarena ere, Ployhart eta Bliese-ren (2006) eta Park eta Park-en (2019) ereduetan oinarrituta, bai eta konstruktu hori ebaluatzen duten tresnena ere. Eremu publikoan giza baliabideak kudeatzean jardun moldagarriak dituen inplikazioak aztertzen dira, bereziki hautaketaren, prestakuntzaren, karrera-kudeaketaren eta lanpostuen diseinuaren arloan. Resumen: El desempeño adaptativo es un constructo clave para las organizaciones porque la capacidad de adaptación a las demandas del entorno es vital, especialmente en tiempos de crisis o cambios tecnológicos, económicos o laborales. Este artículo aporta una revisión teórica del concepto de desempeño adaptativo, de su relación con otros constructos y elementos organizacionales en base a los modelos de Ployhart y Bliese (2006) y Park y Park (2019), así como de los instrumentos que evalúan dicho constructo. Se analizan las implicaciones que tiene el desempeño adaptativo para la gestión de recursos humanos en el ámbito público, especialmente en materia de selección, formación, gestión de carrera y diseño de puestos de trabajo. Abstract: Adaptive performance is a key construct for organizations because the ability to adapt to the demands of the environment is vital, especially in times of crisis or technological, economic or labor changes. This paper provides a theoretical review of the concept of adaptive performance, its relationship with other constructs and organizational elements based on the models of Ployhart and Bliese (2006) and Park and Park (2019), as well as the instruments that evaluate the construct. The implications of adaptive performance for human resource management in the public sector are analyzed, especially in terms of selection, training, career management and job design.


2021 ◽  
Vol 138-139 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 173-194
Author(s):  
Joanna Samul

The paper presents the main topics of research in the field of workplace spirituality in the context of human resource management (HRM). The study is based on a literature review and bibliometric analysis of publications in order to determine the main topics undertaken in this field and their importance for human resource management. In total, 123 publications from the Web of Science database from the years 1999–2020 were analyzed using cluster analysis applying the VOSviewer method. The paper provides definitions and dimensions of workplace spirituality, and considers the significance of spirituality in human resource management. The contribution of the research is to shed light on the concept of a spiritual workplace in HRM and to indicate directions for future research in this field.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clotilde Coron

PurposeWith a focus on the evolution of human resource management (HRM) quantification over 2000–2020, this study addresses the following questions: (1) What are the data sources used to quantify HRM? (2) What are the methods used to quantify HRM? (3) What are the objectives of HRM quantification? (4) What are the representations of quantification in HRM?Design/methodology/approachThis study is based on an integrative synthesis of 94 published peer-reviewed empirical and non-empirical articles on the use of quantification in HRM. It uses the theoretical framework of the sociology of quantification.FindingsThe analysis shows that there have been several changes in HRM quantification over 2000–2020 in terms of data sources, methods and objectives. Meanwhile, representations of quantification have evolved relatively little; it is still considered as a tool, and this ignores the possible conflicts and subjectivity associated with the use of quantification.Originality/valueThis literature review addresses the use of quantification in HRM in general and is thus larger in scope than previous reviews. Notably, it brings forth new insights on possible differences between the main uses of quantification in HRM, as well as on artificial intelligence and algorithms in HRM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document