scholarly journals An update on genetic risk scores for coronary artery disease: are they useful for predicting disease risk and guiding clinical decisions?

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 443-447
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Lieb ◽  
Ramachandran S. Vasan
ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 723-725
Author(s):  
Heribert Schunkert

The elucidation of genetic mechanisms affecting the risk of atherosclerosis has largely benefited from recent technological breakthroughs in terms of high-throughput sequencing and genotyping. While a decade ago only a positive family history and mutations causing familial hypercholesterolaemia were proven to confer genetic risk of atherosclerosis, by now multiple genes have been implicated in monogenic and complex forms of accelerated atherosclerosis. At the population level, the discovery of hundreds of common variants, each affecting the risk of atherosclerosis by a small margin, may have even broader implications. A substantial finding from these studies is that the risk of atherosclerosis and its clinical manifestations, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease, is secondary to a much broader spectrum of underlying (genetic) mechanisms than previously thought. Indeed, the genetic variants leading to atherosclerosis go far beyond the effects of classical risk factors, such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, and smoking. Based on these findings, genetic risk scores are scrutinized to improve the prediction of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. Remarkably, people with a high genetic risk burden have the greatest benefit from therapeutic lowering of LDL cholesterol. Currently, the systems biology of the multiple interacting factors contributing to the risk of atherosclerosis as well as respective therapeutic implications, in part addressed by Mendelian randomization studies, is subject to intensive research. Likewise, genetic risk scores are scrutinized to improve the prediction of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. This chapter gives a brief overview on the current understanding of the genetic underpinnings of atherosclerosis.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietari Ripatti ◽  
Joel T Rämö ◽  
Nina J Mars ◽  
Sanni Söderlund ◽  
Christian Benner ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundHyperlipidemia is a highly heritable risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia associates with higher increase in CAD risk than expected from a single LDL-C measurement, likely due to lifelong cumulative exposure to high LDL-C. It remains unclear to what extent a high polygenic load of LDL-C or TG-increasing variants associates with increased CAD risk.Methods and ResultsWe derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) with ∼6M variants for LDL-C and TG with weights from a UK biobank-based genome-wide association study with ∼500K samples. We evaluated the impact of polygenic hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia to lipid levels in 27 039 individuals from the FINRISK cohort, and to CAD risk in 135 300 individuals (13 695 CAD cases) from the FinnGen project.In FINRISK, LDL-C ranged from 2.83 (95% CI 2.79-2.89) to 3.80 (3.72-3.88) and TG from 0.99 (0.95-1.01) to 1.52 (1.48-1.58) mmol/l between the lowest and highest 5% of the respective PRS distributions. The corresponding CAD prevalences ranged from 8.2% to 12.7% for the LDL-C PRS and from 8.2% to 12.1% for the TG PRS in FinnGen. Furthermore, CAD risk was 1.36-fold higher (OR, 95% CI 1.24-1.49) for the LDL-C PRS and 1.31-fold higher (1.20-1.44) for the TG PRS for those with the PRS >95th percentile vs those without. These estimates were only slightly attenuated when adjusting for a CAD PRS (OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.15-1.39] for LDL-C and 1.21 [1.10-1.32] for TG PRS).ConclusionsThe CAD risk associated with a high polygenic load for lipid-increasing variants was proportional to their impact on lipid levels and mostly independent of a CAD PRS. In contrast with a PRS for CAD, the lipid PRSs point to known and directly modifiable risk factors providing more direct guidance for clinical translation.


Author(s):  
Pietari Ripatti ◽  
Joel T. Rämö ◽  
Nina J. Mars ◽  
Yu Fu ◽  
Jake Lin ◽  
...  

Background: Hyperlipidemia is a highly heritable risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). While monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia associates with severely increased CAD risk, it remains less clear to what extent a high polygenic load of a large number of LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol (LDL-C) or triglyceride (TG)-increasing variants associates with increased CAD risk. Methods: We derived polygenic risk scores (PRSs) with ≈6M variants separately for LDL-C and TG with weights from a UK Biobank–based genome-wide association study with ≈324K samples. We evaluated the impact of polygenic hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia to lipid levels in 27 039 individuals from the National FINRISK Study (FINRISK) cohort and to CAD risk in 135 638 individuals (13 753 CAD cases) from the FinnGen project (FinnGen). Results: In FINRISK, median LDL-C was 3.39 (95% CI, 3.38–3.40) mmol/L, and it ranged from 2.87 (95% CI, 2.82–2.94) to 3.78 (95% CI, 3.71–3.83) mmol/L between the lowest and highest 5% of the LDL-C PRS distribution. Median TG was 1.19 (95% CI, 1.18–1.20) mmol/L, ranging from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94–1.00) to 1.55 (95% CI, 1.48–1.61) mmol/L with the TG PRS. In FinnGen, comparing the highest 5% of the PRS to the lowest 95%, CAD odds ratio was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.24–1.49) for the LDL-C PRS and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19–1.43) for the TG PRS. These estimates were only slightly attenuated when adjusting for a CAD PRS (odds ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16–1.38] for LDL-C and 1.24 [95% CI, 1.13–1.36] for TG PRS). Conclusions: The CAD risk associated with a high polygenic load for lipid-increasing variants was proportional to their impact on lipid levels and partially overlapping with a CAD PRS. In contrast with a PRS for CAD, the lipid PRSs point to known and directly modifiable risk factors providing additional guidance for clinical translation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (9) ◽  
pp. 1159-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna G. Aragam ◽  
Pradeep Natarajan

An individual’s susceptibility to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is influenced by numerous clinical and lifestyle factors, motivating the multifaceted approaches currently endorsed for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. With growing knowledge of the genetic basis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease—in particular, coronary artery disease—and its contribution to disease pathogenesis, there is increased interest in understanding the potential clinical utility of a genetic predictor that might further refine the assessment and management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Rapid scientific and technological advances have enabled widespread genotyping efforts and dynamic research in the field of coronary artery disease genetic risk prediction. In this review, we describe how genomic analyses of coronary artery disease have been leveraged to create polygenic risk scores. We then discuss evaluations of the clinical utility of these scores, pertinent mechanistic insights gleaned, and practical considerations relevant to the implementation of polygenic risk scores in the health care setting.


Author(s):  
Yunfeng Huang ◽  
Qin Hui ◽  
Marta Gwinn ◽  
Yi-Juan Hu ◽  
Arshed A. Quyyumi ◽  
...  

Background - The genomic structure that contributes to the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) can be evaluated as a risk score of multiple variants. However, sex differences have not been fully examined in applications of genetic risk score of CAD. Methods - Using data from the UK Biobank, we constructed a CAD genetic risk score based on all known loci, three mediating trait-based (blood pressure, lipids, body mass index) sub-scores, and a genome-wide polygenic risk score based on 1.1 million variants. The differences in genetic associations with prevalent and incident CAD between men and women were investigated among 317,509 unrelated individuals of European ancestry. We also assessed interactions with sex for 161 individual loci included in the comprehensive genetic risk score. Results - For both prevalent and incident CAD, the associations of comprehensive and genome-wide genetic risk scores were stronger among men than women. Using a score of 161 loci, we observed a 2.4 times higher risk for incident CAD comparing men with high genetic risk to men with low genetic risk, but an 80 percent greater risk comparing women with high genetic risk to women with low genetic risk. (interaction p=0.002). Of the three sub-scores, the blood pressure-associated sub-score exhibited sex differences (interaction p=0.0004 per SD increase in sub-score). Analysis of individual variants identified a novel gene-sex interaction at locus 21q22.11 . Conclusions - Sexual differences in genetic predisposition should be considered in future studies of coronary artery disease, and genetic risk scores should not be assumed to perform equally well in men and women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document