The Effects of Employment Interventions on Addiction Treatment Outcomes: A Review of the Literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Walton ◽  
Martin T. Hall
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Worley ◽  
Keith G. Heinzerling ◽  
Steven Shoptaw ◽  
Walter Ling

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 579-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra C Jones ◽  
Keryn Johnson

Improvements in cancer detection and treatment have led to consistent declines in mortality from many cancers. However, many patients present for treatment at a point where more invasive treatment is required and/or treatment outcomes are less than optimal. One factor that has been consistently shown to be associated with late diagnosis and treatment is delay in seeking help for symptoms. This paper reviews the literature on women's awareness of cancer symptoms and aims to identify knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in order to improve help-seeking behaviors. The discovery of substantial gaps in awareness suggest a need for improved community education regarding cancer symptoms.


2002 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 683-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig S Rosen ◽  
Paige C Ouimette ◽  
Javaid I Sheikh ◽  
Jennifer A Gregg ◽  
Rudolf H Moos

Author(s):  
Karen Werder ◽  
Alexa Curtis ◽  
Stephanie Reynolds ◽  
Jason Satterfield

BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in access to medications for opioid use disorder, less than 20% of individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) receive treatment. Stigmatizing language has been identified as a potential trigger for explicit and implicit biases that may adversely affect treatment enrollment and quality of care for persons with OUD. AIMS: To conduct a narrative review of the literature on stigmatizing language and OUD, examine how treatment outcomes are affected, and present strategies to reduce bias and promote OUD treatment. METHOD: A narrative review of the literature between 2010 and 2019 was conducted using CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO. Key search terms were opioid use disorder (or substance use disorder), stigma, and language. Fifty-two articles were screened for inclusion, and 17 articles were included in this review. RESULTS: The articles reviewed provide consensus that stigmatizing language toward persons with OUD fosters explicit and implicit bias and impedes engagement in treatment. Four themes emerged: (1) stigma and language, (2) stigma and language used by health care professionals, (3) stigma and language used by the general public, and (4) stigma and language used by people with OUD. CONCLUSIONS: Stigmatizing language is dehumanizing and plays a pivotal role in bias and discrimination that may contribute to unsatisfactory treatment outcomes among persons with OUD. Health care professionals, nursing in particular, must assume an intentional stance against stigma perpetuated toward persons with OUD through advocacy in education, practice, policy, and the media.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 79-87
Author(s):  
Asfandyar Mufti ◽  
Sara Mirali ◽  
Abrahim Abduelmula ◽  
Katherine Ann McDonald ◽  
Shaikhah Alabdulrazzaq ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document