Dialogue in an Upper Secondary School and the Subject Religion and Ethics in Norway

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dag Husebø ◽  
Geir Skeie ◽  
Ann Kristin Tokheim Allaico ◽  
Torunn Helene Bjørnevik
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aron Gauti Laxdal

The overreaching aim of this thesis was to gain a better understanding of the students’ perceptions of the learning environment in upper secondary school physical education, with special focus on marginalized subgroups. More specifically, the intention was to explore whether students perceived their learning environment differently depending on their teachers’ gender, the learning support they received or the perceived competence they had. Despite the learning environment being a well-researched phenomenon in the more academic school subjects, there was a substantial knowledge gap concerning its influence in physical education. The individual works that form this ensemble aimed to occlude some of those gaps. In an effort to achieve the aforementioned aims, a new instrument measuring teacher learning support in the physical education context was also constructed and validated. The chosen methodology for the thesis was cross-sectional, comprising of a multicomponent self-report questionnaire. The data was analyzed using various analytical tools, including structural modeling analysis and MANCOVA between group comparisons. The participants were 1133 upper secondary school students (Mage = 17.2, SD = 0.86) from Norway (n = 554) and Iceland (n = 579), and 17 Norwegian PE teachers (11 males, 6 females). The sampling of participants was performed using a stratified procedure representing both urban, suburban and rural settlements. Multiple steps were taken to ensure adequate sample representability. The collective results of the individual papers indicate that the current organizational trends in PE are more in line with the needs of the highly competent students, and less so with the needs of the less competent students. This tendency intensifies the differences between these groups and may be one of the primary drivers behind the negative relationship between age and appreciation for the subject. Further, the students do not appear to be self- regulating their learning to the same extent as they are in other subjects, despite the teachers efforts to facilitate the behavior. The cause of this discrepancy likely being PE’s reputation as a recreational subject, underlined by the absence of homework and the playful nature of the lessons. Additionally, the role of the teacher’s gender in influencing the PE experience seems to be exaggerated. Gender matching and positive discrimination of female PE teachers are therefore unlikely to improve the learning environment of female students. The concluding recommendations are multitudinous and include suggestions to all the stakeholders of the subject. They include an appeal to the policymakers to rely more heavily on the body of research when implementing or adjusting policy, a plea to the teaching institutions educating the physical education teachers to emphasize formative teaching practices to a greater extent in their program, in order to promote learning behavior, and a call to the physical education teachers to address the various challenges related to the less interested and less competent students by reducing the benefits of sporting experience and ameliorating the current curriculum implementations by introducing more non-traditional sports and activities.


2021 ◽  
pp. 213-241
Author(s):  
Anja Thorsten ◽  
Marcus Samuelsson ◽  
Johan Meckbach ◽  
Camilla Heiskanen ◽  
Anneli Mohlin

Previous research describes classroom management as both complex and demanding. Therefore, teachers as leaders need to make many choices about how to handle situations and students. The aim of this study is to describe teachers’ considerations when they are managing the classroom. The study was conducted by a teacher-research team.  The data consist of 12 focus-group interviews with 46 Swedish teachers, spanning from primary to upper secondary school. Through thematic analysis, the following four themes of consideration emerged: (a) control – how much control teachers as leaders should have and how much co-decision that should be given to the students, (b) role – if teachers should be strict or personal, (c) focus – if teachers should focus on the subject or relations to students, and (d) differentiation – if teachers should focus on each individual or on the entire group. This result is an important contribution to understanding the challenges teachers face when managing the classroom and trying to provide learning and development to all students.


2015 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-345
Author(s):  
Thomas Weiß

Summary The article is devoted to the subject of Religious Education and the public sphere. Its leading question explores the ability of students of upper secondary school to argue about creation and evolution. Argumentation is understood as one of the key cultural techniques needed in order to participate in the public discourse. Examples are provided that serve as a starting point for a model to foster argumentation in religious education. The article concludes with the thesis that a decisive task of religious education research and practice should be to foster argumentation as a decisive cultural technique for the public discourse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silje Andresen

Using a toolkit approach in combination with the concept of street-level bureaucracy and theories of discretion, this article has empirically investigated the resources that influence teachers’ discretionary reasoning when teaching controversial issues. The analysis has been based on 32 classroom observations at two upper secondary schools in Oslo, Norway, in one Religion and Ethics and one Social Science class, and interviews with 16 teachers who taught the same subjects. The results have shown that professional competence, professional and personal values, and relationships with pupils worked as a toolkit of resources that teachers could draw upon when making discretionary judgments in different contexts. A better understanding of teachers’ use of discretionary reasoning may enable curriculum developers and policymakers to support teachers in the complex social landscape of teaching controversial issues.


2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt-Ove Andreassen

Both research and public and scholarly debate on religious education (RE) in Norway have mostly revolved around the subject in primary and secondary school called Christianity, Religion and Ethics (KRL) (later renamed Religion, Philosophies of Life and Ethics, RLE), not least due to the criticisms raised by the UN’s Human Rights Committee in 2004 and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2007 of the Norwegian model for RE in primary and secondary schools. The RE subject in upper secondary school, however, is hardly ever mentioned. The same applies to teacher education. This article therefore aims at providing some insight into how RE has developed in the Norwegian educational system overall, ranging from primary and secondary to upper secondary and including the different forms of teacher education.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Marie Isager

Danske gymnasieelever bliver – ligesom norske – eksamineret ved mundtlig præsen-tation og samtale om et udtrukket emne af deres lærer og en censor fra et andet gymnasium. Disse eksaminer undersøges ikke systematisk, og der forskes ikke i dem. Det samlede eksamensresultat er high-stakes og får konsekvenser for elevens fremtidige uddannelsesmuligheder. Artiklen undersøger centrale danske styredokumenter, der regulerer mundtlige danske eksaminer i gymnasiet ved at lægge et teoretisk blik hentet fra international anerkendt assessmentteori: Hvad intenderer eksamen at måle? Assess¬mentteoretiske begreber defineret af Standards for Educational and Psychological testing og Michael T. Kanes argumentationsbaserede tilgang til validitet bruges til at søge efter et konstrukt og slutninger i eksamenssystemet. Data er lovdokumententer samt læreplan og vejledning i historiefaget som eksempel i det almene gymnasium med et almendannende og studieforberedende formål. Dermed er artiklen et tillæg til Acta Didactica Norges temanummer vol. 12 nr. 4 om Test og eksamen i Sverige og Norge. Studiet finder, at konstruktet er vanskeligt at identificere. Antagelser om mundtlige eksaminer er ikke ekspliciterede i dokumenterne, og slutninger må analyseres frem. Eleven eksamineres i et dobbelt udtræk- eller samplingssystem: Eksamensfaget udtrækkes og emnet inden for disciplinen udtrækkes. Der etableres dermed en antagelse om vidtgående generaliseringsmulighed af testresultatet på tværs af fag. Det diskuteres om assessmentteori egner sig til diskussion af traditionsrige danske mundtlige eksaminer. Nøkkelord: mundtlig eksamen, assessment, konstrukt, gymnasiet, Danmark Construct, Generalization and Luck in Danish Oral Examinations in Upper Secondary School AbstractDanish and Norwegian upper secondary school students are assessed on their presen-tation and discussion of a sampled topic by their teacher (the examiner) and a teacher from another school (external examiner). These oral exams are not investigated systematically even though they are high stakes tests with considerable consequences for the students’ potential choice of further education. The article investigates the construct of the oral exam: What are oral exams intended to assess? Data are key law documents, the curriculum and the instructions given for the subject of History as an example. The documents are read with assessment theory as defined in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and Michael T. Kane’s argument-based approach to validity. The study finds that the construct is difficult to identify. No explicit arguments or inferences are found in the documents read, and inferences must be interpreted between the lines. Each student is assessed in a double sampling system: The subject is sampled, and the theme of the exam is sampled within the subject. The article shows a system built with inferences of extensive generalization from one score interpretation to potential other performances across the curricula. It is discussed whether assessment theory is adequate for the Danish educational traditions. Keywords: oral exam, assessment, construct, upper secondary school, Denmark


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document