Age and psoriatic arthritis are important predictors of biologic agent switch in psoriasis

Author(s):  
Neslihan Akdogan ◽  
Sibel Dogan ◽  
Ecem Bostan ◽  
Duygu Gulseren ◽  
Basak Yalici-Armagan ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. AB62
Author(s):  
Raquel Aragón-Miguel ◽  
Isabel Martín González ◽  
Olga González-Valle ◽  
Ángel Aragón-Díez

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samy Metyas ◽  
Christopher Tomassian ◽  
Ramy Messiah ◽  
Tina Gettas ◽  
Christina Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-medicated inflammatory condition that affects 2-3% of the population, which can lead to psoriatic arthritis. There are multiple regimens for the treatment of psoriasis including disease- modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDS) and biologic agent, phototherapy and apremilast. While monotherapy with biologic agents is effective for many patients with psoriasis some patients are not satisfied by the outcome and require combination therapy. No data exist on the safety of apremilast as a component of combination therapy with biological therapies. Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the safety of apremilast in combination of biologic therapies in the treatment of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Methods: This was retrospective study, open label study carried out at a single community Rheumatology center. Twenty-two patients diagnosed with plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis according to American college of Rheumatology criteria-participated. Apremilast was added to their current biologic agent. Patients were permitted to their current biologic treatment. Results: Out of 22 patients, six patients developed side effects, none of which caused discontinuation of therapy. Out of the six patients who developed side effects, two patients developed nausea and two patients developed diarrhea. One patient developed weight loss and one patient developed abdominal pain. Conclusion: Apremilast can be safely combined with all biologic agents in patients with plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis not responding adequately to biologics alone.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Ehrlich ◽  
Nimah Jamaluddin ◽  
Joseph Pisegna ◽  
David Padua

Secukinumab is an interleukin-17 inhibitor used for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis. The risk of exacerbating underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients being treated with secukinumab for other conditions is controversial. We document a patient with AS and previously undiagnosed IBD, found to be in a severe ulcerative colitis flare shortly after receiving the loading dose of secukinumab. There are no guidelines regarding biologic salvage therapy for IBD in the setting of active treatment with another biologic agent. After waiting one half-life of secukinumab, our patient had an excellent response to initiation of infliximab.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Haddad ◽  
Tal Gazitt ◽  
Ilan Feldhamer ◽  
Joy Feld ◽  
Arnon Dov Cohen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Persistence of biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients is an important factor in individualized patient treatment planning and healthcare policy and guideline development. Objective To estimate the persistence of biologic agents prescribed to PsA patients in a real-life setting as well as factors associated with improved biologic drug survival in these patients. Methods Patients with PsA from a large healthcare provider database with at least two consecutive dispensed prescriptions of a biologic agent indicated for PsA from January 1, 2002, until December 31, 2018, were identified and followed until medication stop date or the end of observation period. Patients were considered non-persistent whenever a permissible lag time of 6 months from the time of prescription issuance until medication filling date was exceeded. Treatment changes were based on physician decisions and patient preferences. Demographic data including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, smoking history, and socioeconomic status as well as Charlson comorbidity index were retrieved. Data regarding use of steroids and conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) were also extracted. Descriptive statistics, including means (standard deviations) for continuous variables and frequencies (%) for categorical variables, were used. Persistence estimates were derived using non-parametric survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier functions, with treatment discontinuations as failure events. Cox regression hazard ratio models were conducted to investigate factors associated with drug persistence. Results A total of 2301 PsA patients with 2958 treatment periods were identified and included in the analyses. Mean age of the study population was 50.9 ± 14 years, 54% were females, 70.4% were with BMI > 25, 40% were current smokers, and 76% were with a Charlson comorbidity index > 1. The most commonly prescribed drug was etanercept (33%), followed by adalimumab (29%), golimumab (12%), secukinumab (10%), ustekinumab (8%), and infliximab (8%). While approximately 40% of patients persisted on therapy following 20 months of treatment, only about 20% of patients remained on any particular biologic agent after 5 years. Analyzing the data for all treatment periods while taking into account all lines of therapy revealed that secukinumab had a higher persistency than adalimumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab, with a log rank of 0.022, 0.047, and 0.001, respectively. Female sex and smoking were associated with lower drug persistence (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.13–1.38 and HR = 1.109, 95% CI = 1.01–1.21, respectively). On analyzing the data using only the first indicated biologic line, no superiority of any single anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agent was observed, while secukinumab was found to be superior as second line therapy to adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinumab but not to golimumab with a log rank P value of 0.001, 0.004, 0.025, and 0.002, respectively. Conclusions In this large observational cohort studied in the era of biologic therapy, a relatively low drug persistence was observed, with female sex and smoking having a negative impact on persistency. None of the anti-TNFα agents was found to be more persistent than others as first line therapy, while secukinumab was found to be superior to other biologics when indicated as second line of therapy.


2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. S14-S22
Author(s):  
Yves Poulin ◽  
Aditya K. Gupta ◽  
John D. Amiss

Etanercept is a fully human dimeric fusion protein that reversibly binds tumor necrosis factor α. The first approved indication for etanercept was for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. It has also been shown to be highly efficacious in numerous large-scale trials for the treatment of plaque psoriasis; this indication was approved in Canada, the United States, and Europe. The recommended dosing of etanercept for plaque psoriasis is 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 50 mg per week. Etanercept given at 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks significantly improved plaque psoriasis, as assessed by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), in which 75% reduction in PASI scores (PASI 75) has been the gold standard for judging effective therapy. Dosing given for 12 weeks produced PASI 75 rates of 47 to 49% in the phase 3 clinical trials. Longer treatment periods at this dosage have been investigated, from 24 to 48 weeks, with PASI 75 increasing to 63%. The importance of quality of life for psoriasis patients has been the focus of recent trials, and etanercept has been shown significant improvement in quality of life measures. Interim results from a phase 3b study suggest that etanercept may help reduce the burden of health care resources use by psoriatics. Etanercept has also shown efficacy in nail psoriasis. Case reports indicate that etanercept may be useful in psoriatic erythroderma, pustular psoriasis, guttate psoriasis, and palmopustular psoriasis. Etanercept is an effective biologic agent currently approved for the management of plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1688.1-1688
Author(s):  
A. Haddad ◽  
T. Gazitt ◽  
I. Feldhamer ◽  
J. Feld ◽  
A. Cohen ◽  
...  

Background:Persistence in biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis is critical to optimize symptom remission, functional capacity and health care costs.Objectives:To estimate the persistence to biologic treatment prescribed to PsA patients in a real-life setting as well as factors associated with improved biologic drug survival in these patients.Methods:Patients with PsA from a large health care provider database with at least two consecutive dispensed prescriptions of a biologic agent indicated for PsA from January 1st, 2002 until December 31st, 2018 were identified and followed until medication stop date or the end of observation period. Patients were considered non-persistent whenever a new prescription was dispensed and a permissible gap of 6 months was exceeded prior to starting on this biologic agent from the prescription date. Treatment changes were based on physician decisions and patient preferences.Demographic data including age, sex, BMI, ethnicity, smoking history and socioeconomic status as well as Charlson comorbidity index were retrieved. Data regarding use of steroids and non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were also extracted. Descriptive statistics, including means (standard deviations) for continuous variables and frequencies (%) for categorical variables, were used. Persistence estimates were derived using non-parametric survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier functions, with treatment discontinuations as failure events. Cox regression hazard ratio models were conducted to investigate factors associated with drug persistence.Results:2301 PsA patients with 2958 treatment periods were identified and included in the analyses. The mean age was 50.9±14 years of whom 54% were females, 70.4% of the study population had a BMI>25, and 36% were obese(BMI>30), 40% were current smokers, and 76% had a Charlson comorbidity index higher than 1. The most commonly prescribed drug was etanercept, followed by adalimumab, golimumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab and infliximab at 33%, 29%, 12%, 10%,8% and 8%, respectively. Only about 20% of patients remained on a particular biologic agent after 5 years, whereas about 40% persisted on therapy following 20 months of treatment. A Kaplan-Mayer survival analysis with pairwise comparisons of all treatment choices with respect to lines of therapy was conducted. When analyzing the data for all treatment periods and taking into account all lines of therapy, secukinumab had a higher persistency than adalimumab, infliximab and ustekinumab, with a Log Rank of 0.022, 0.047 and 0.001, respectively, as is shown in figure 1. Female sex and smoking were associated with lower drug persistence (HR=1.25, 95%CI 1.13-1.38 and HR=1.109, 95%CI 1.01-1.21, respectively). When analyzing the data regarding second-line biologic agents, secukinumab was found to be superior to adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab but not to golimumab with a Log-Rank P value of 0.001, 0.004, 0.025 and 0.002, respectively (figure 2). On analyzing the data using only the first indicated biologic line, no superiority of any single anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (anti-TNFα) agent was observed.Conclusion:In this large observational cohort, in the era of biologic therapy, a relatively low persistence was observed, with female sex and smoking having a negative impact on persistency. None of the anti-TNFα agents as first line therapy was found to be more persistent than others, while secukinumab was found to be superior to other biologics when indicated as second line of therapy.References:NoneFigure 1.Figure 2.Acknowledgments:noneDisclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1165-1166
Author(s):  
S. B. Kocaer ◽  
T. Yüce İnel ◽  
Y. Erez ◽  
A. Köken Avşar ◽  
S. Uslu ◽  
...  

Background:Currently, biologic treatments are used effectively in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare long-term drug survival of the first biologic treatments including adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, secukinumab and ustekinumab in patients with PsA.Methods:PsA patients, electronically registered at each visit in the TURKBIO database between 2011 and 2019 were included in the study. PASW 18.0 for Windows was used for statistical analysis. Drug survival rates were calculated by Kaplan Meier method.Results:355 patients (227 women; axial PsA = 48, peripheral PsA = 307) were included in the study (Table 1). Adalimumab was the most commonly used first biologic treatment (n=125; 37.6%). The rate of drug survival was found to be 0.75 at month 60 in patients receiving the first biologic treatment (Figure 1). There was no significant difference in drug survival rate between tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) and non-TNFi biologic drugs (p=0.56). No difference was also found in drug survival rates between each biologic treatment.Table 1.Initial demographic and clinical datas of patients with PsAPsA Patients (n=355)Females, n (%)227 (63,9)Age of diagnosis, years*34,6 (27-42)CRP baseline*6 mg/ L (3-15)ESR baseline*24 mm/h (10-38)Smoking, n (%)Current99 (28,5)Never192 (55,3)Previous56 (16,2)HLA B27 positivity,n (%)41 (26,4)First biologic agent, n (%)-TNFi332 (95,4)AdalimumabEtanercept125 (37,6)80 (24,1)Golimumab52 (15,6)Certolizumab44 (13,3)Infliximab31 (9,4)- Other biologic agents16 (4,6)Secukinumab13 (81,3)Ustekinumab3 (18,7)*median (min-max)Conclusion:The results of this study establish that more than half of patients with PsA can remain in their initial biologic treatment over a long term. It has been observed that the choice of biologic treatment did not effect the drug survival in PsA.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document