scholarly journals Knowledge and behaviors of nurses working at Inonu University Turgut Ozal Medical Center on childhood vaccine refusal

Author(s):  
Gulseda Boz ◽  
Ayse Gokce ◽  
Esra Yigit ◽  
Mehmet Aslan ◽  
Ali Ozer
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 2183-2194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Carrion

Recent increases in childhood vaccine exemption rates are a source of concern within the public health community. Drawing from the health belief model and in-depth interviews with 50 mothers ( n = 50) who refused one or more vaccine, the aim of this study was to identify the specific reasons and the broader decision context(s) that underscored participants’ vaccine refusal. Results indicate that the vast majority of participants supported vaccination until a particular cue motivated them to consider otherwise, and qualitative analysis identified three main categories into which these cues fell: perceived adverse reactions, endorsements from health care professionals, and perceived contradiction among expert-endorsed messages. These categories point to the central role of health communication in motivating vaccine refusal. Better understanding these cues can inform vaccine communication scholarship and practice, and also lend theoretical insight into the intertextual nature of controversial health messages and decisions.


1993 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
EH Elpern ◽  
SB Yellen ◽  
LA Burton

BACKGROUND: Advance directives are a means of promoting patient autonomy in end-of-life decisions but are used infrequently. A recent federal law requires healthcare organizations to provide information to patients about advance directives. This study explored attitudes and behaviors related to the use of advance directives in three areas: familiarity with advance directives, reasons for completing or not completing advance directives and preferences for receiving information about advance directives. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered by personal interview to a nonrandomized convenience sample of 46 inpatients and 50 outpatients at a large, tertiary care, urban academic medical center in the summer of 1991. RESULTS: Most respondents (77%) had heard of either the living will or durable power of attorney for healthcare, but only 52% correctly understood the purpose of these documents. Twenty-nine percent of the sample had executed an advance directive. Those who had advance directives were older and considered themselves less healthy than did those without advance directives. Unfamiliarity with advance directives and procrastination were cited most often as reasons for not having an advance directive. Most subjects (65%) had spoken with someone, usually a family member or close friend, about preferences for treatment during a critical illness. Although they had rarely discussed advance directives, 83% anticipated that they would be comfortable doing so with a physician or a nurse. CONCLUSIONS: Advance directives are used infrequently to document treatment preferences. The success of programs to promote greater use of advance directives depends on a clearer understanding of the factors that influence both decision and action to execute an advance directive. Patients claim to be comfortable in discussing the topic and prefer that such discussions occur in the outpatient setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Boz ◽  
E Yigit ◽  
A Gokce ◽  
M Aslan ◽  
A Ozer

Abstract Background Among 10 global problems of 2019 determined by the World Health Organization, vaccine refusal was one of the problems mentioned. In this context, health services and health personnel whose main objectives are to keep individuals healthy and to prevent diseases have major responsibilities. This study aims to analyze knowledge and behavior of nurses working in Malatya Turgut Özal Hospital on childhood vaccine refusal. Methods This study, conducted between June-July 2019, is a descriptive cross-sectional study and its universe is composed of 850 nurses working in Turgut Özal hospital. Sample size was calculated to be 263 at a confidence interval of 95% and strength of 80%. In the questionnaire, sociodemographic questions on nurses and children as well as questions determining nurses' knowledge and behavior on childhood vaccine refusal were asked. Chi-square test and Fisher's Exact Test were used in statistical analyses. p < 0.05 was determined to be significant. Results 31.7% of nurses participating in the study stated that they had concerns on childhood vaccines. Two-thirds of nurses stated that their knowledge on vaccines were from their education, one-thirds of them knew that childhood vaccines were mandatory by law while three out of four stated they knew the vaccination schedule recommended by the Ministry of Health. The level of concern in those agreeing to the fact that vaccines caused autism and infertility, those stating that they did not trust vaccine-producing companies, and those stating that catching the disease was a better immunization method than vaccination was significantly higher than those not agreeing to these and those who were indecisive (p < 0.05). Conclusions One-thirds of nurses was proven to have concerns on childhood vaccines and this rate is rather high. Nurses, being both health personnel and the communication channel for guiding parents, should be provided necessary trainings and practices in order to ease their concerns on vaccination. Key messages In-service trainings should be given importance in order to reduce nurses’ concern. Due to the fact that the information source for nurses on vaccination was their education, subjects that would eliminate their concerns should be highlighted.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1045-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Repalust ◽  
Sandra Šević ◽  
Stanko Rihtar ◽  
Aleksandar Štulhofer

2016 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney Zisook ◽  
Ilanit Young ◽  
Neal Doran ◽  
Nancy Downs ◽  
Allison Hadley ◽  
...  

Physicians are among the highest risk groups for suicide, and emerging data suggest this risk begins early in medical training. We describe a screening program at one medical center for identifying and referring physicians and students who may be at risk for suicide, and we explore differences between groups with respect to depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation (SI) and behaviors, and utilization of mental health resources. Over a 5-year period (May 2009–August 2014), we invited 1,134 medical students, 1,380 house staff (residents and fellows), and 1,922 faculty to complete an anonymous web-based “stress” questionnaire including items about depression symptoms, SI and behaviors, emotional distress features, drinking and drug-use behaviors, problematic eating, and utilization of treatments for depression and anxiety. Response rates among each group ranged from 17% (house staff) to 33% (students). Overall, 7% to 10% of respondents met criteria for a current major depressive syndrome, and 9% to 11% of respondents endorsed current SI. Similarities in depression severity and SI between groups far outweighed differences. The following were the four unique predictors of SI: presence of moderately severe or severe depressive symptoms, impairment, hopelessness, and past attempts. Only 17% of those endorsing current SI were taking antidepressant medication, and only 12% were receiving psychotherapy. However, 16% accepted referrals provided through this program. Increased efforts at education and destigmatization, outreach, assessment, and treatment at medical schools are essential. Our educational and screening program is one model others might employ to work toward this goal, though it is likely that additional outreach methods are needed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seda Topçu ◽  
Habip Almış ◽  
Sevgi Başkan ◽  
Mehmet Turgut ◽  
Filiz Şimşek Orhon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document