scholarly journals A cell cycle and mutational analysis of anchorage-independent growth: cell adhesion and TGF-beta 1 control G1/S transit specifically

1993 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 461-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
EK Han ◽  
TM Guadagno ◽  
SL Dalton ◽  
RK Assoian
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Fibroblast Cell ◽  
Tgf Beta ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Anchorage Independent Growth ◽  
Differential Effects ◽  
3T3 Fibroblasts ◽  
Nih 3T3

We have examined cell cycle control of anchorage-independent growth in nontransformed fibroblasts. In previous studies using G0-synchronized NRK and NIH-3T3 cells, we showed that anchorage-independent growth is regulated by an attachment-dependent transition at G1/S that resembles the START control point in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the studies reported here, we have synchronized NRK and NIH-3T3 fibroblasts immediately after this attachment-dependent transition to determine if other portions of the fibroblast cell cycle are similarly regulated by adhesion. Our results show that S-, G2-, and M-phase progression proceed in the absence of attachment. Thus, we conclude that the adhesion requirement for proliferation of these cells can be explained in terms of the single START-like transition. In related studies, we show that TGF-beta 1 overrides the attachment-dependent transition in NRK and AKR-2B fibroblasts (lines in which TGF-beta 1 induces anchorage-independent growth), but not in NIH-3T3 or Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts (lines in which TGF-beta 1 fails to induce anchorage-independent growth). These results show that (a) adhesion and TGF-beta 1 can have similar effects in stimulating cell cycle progression from G1 to S and (b) the differential effects of TGF-beta 1 on anchorage-independent growth of various fibroblast lines are directly reflected in the differential effects of the growth factor at G1/S. Finally, we have randomly mutagenized NRK fibroblasts to generate mutant lines that have lost their attachment/TGF-beta 1 requirement for G1/S transit while retaining their normal mitogen requirements for proliferation. These clones, which readily proliferate in mitogen-supplemented soft agar, appear non-transformed in monolayer: they are well spread, nonrefractile, and contact inhibited. The existence of this new fibroblast phenotype demonstrates (a) that the growth factor and adhesion/TGF-beta 1 requirements for cell cycle progression are genetically separable, (b) that the two major control points in the fibroblast cell cycle (G0/G1 and G1/S) are regulated by distinct extracellular signals, and (c) that the genes regulating anchorage-independent growth need not be involved in regulating contact inhibition, focus formation, or growth factor dependence.

scholarly journals Ethanol, Zn2+ and insulin interact as progression factors to enhance DNA synthesis synergistically in the presence of Ca2+ and other cell cycle initiators in fibroblasts

2000 ◽  
Vol 346 (1) ◽  
pp. 241-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Sheng HUANG ◽  
Qing-Bai SHE ◽  
Karan S. CRILLY ◽  
Zoltan KISS
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
3T3 Fibroblasts ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Nih 3T3

In serum-starved NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, ethanol (30-80 mM) promoted the effects of insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) on DNA synthesis in a Zn2+-dependent manner. Ethanol and Zn2+ were most effective when added shortly before or after insulin, indicating that all these agents facilitated cell cycle progression. The synergistic effects of ethanol, Zn2+ and insulin (or IGF-I) on DNA synthesis required 1.1-2.3 mM Ca2+, which seemed to act as the cell cycle initiator. When serum-starved cells were pretreated for 2 h with other cell cycle initiators such as 10% (v/v) serum, 50 ng/ml platelet-derived growth factor or 2 ng/ml fibroblast growth factor, subsequent co-treatments with 60 mM ethanol, Zn2+ and insulin for an 18 h period again synergistically increased DNA synthesis. Of the various signal transducing events examined, ethanol stimulated cellular uptake of 45Ca and it enhanced the stimulatory effects of insulin on p70 S6 kinase activity in a Zn2+-dependent manner. In contrast, ethanol inhibited insulin-induced activating phosphorylation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinases; these inhibitory ethanol effects were prevented by Zn2+. The results show that, in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, ethanol can promote cell cycle progression in the presence of a cell cycle initiator as well as Zn2+ and insulin (or IGF-I).

scholarly journals G1/S control of anchorage-independent growth in the fibroblast cell cycle.

1991 ◽  
Vol 115 (5) ◽  
pp. 1419-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
T M Guadagno ◽  
R K Assoian
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Fibroblast Cell ◽  
Close Correlation ◽  
Anchorage Independent Growth ◽  
Mammalian Cell Cycle ◽  
Nih 3T3

We have developed methodology to identify the block to anchorage-independent growth and position it within the fibroblast cell cycle. Results with NRK fibroblasts show that mitogen stimulation of the G0/G1 transition and G1-associated increases in cell size are minimally affected by loss of cell anchorage. In contrast, the induction of G1/S cell cycle genes and DNA synthesis is markedly inhibited when anchorage is blocked. Moreover, we demonstrate that the anchorage-dependent transition maps to late G1 and shortly before activation of the G1/S p34cdc2-like kinase. The G1/S block was also detectable in NIH-3T3 cells. Our results: (a) distinguish control of cell cycle progression by growth factors and anchorage; (b) indicate that anchorage mediates G1/S control in fibroblasts; and (c) identify a physiologic circumstance in which the phenotype of mammalian cell cycle arrest would closely resemble Saccharomyces cerevisiae START. The close correlation between anchorage independence in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo emphasizes the key regulatory role for G1/S control in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals FIN13, a novel growth factor-inducible serine-threonine phosphatase which can inhibit cell cycle progression.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 5485-5498 ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Guthridge ◽  
P Bellosta ◽  
N Tavoloni ◽  
C Basilico
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Transfected Cells ◽  
Inhibit Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nih 3T3

We have identified a novel type 2C serine-threonine phosphatase, FIN13, whose expression is induced by fibroblast growth factor 4 and serum in late G1 phase. The protein encoded by FIN13 cDNA includes N- and C-terminal domains with significant homologies to type 2C phosphatases, a domain homologous to collagen, and an acidic domain. FIN13 expression predominates in proliferating tissues. Bacterially expressed FIN13 and FIN13 expressed in mammalian cells exhibit serine-threonine phosphatase activity, which requires Mn2+ and is insensitive to inhibition by okadaic acid. FIN13 is localized in the nuclei of transiently transfected cells. Cotransfection of FIN13-expressing plasmids with a plasmid that expresses the neomycin resistance gene inhibits the growth of drug-resistant colonies in NIH 3T3, HeLa and Rat-1 cells. In transiently transfected cells, FIN13 inhibits DNA synthesis and results in the accumulation of cells in G1 and early S phases. Similarly, the induction of expression of FIN13 under the control of a tetracycline-regulated promoter in NIH 3T3 cells leads to growth inhibition, with accumulation of cells in G1 and early S phases. Thus, overexpression and/or unregulated expression of FIN13 inhibits cell cycle progression, indicating that the physiological role of this phosphatase may be that of regulating the orderly progression of cells through the mitotic cycle by dephosphorylating specific substrates which are important for cell proliferation.

scholarly journals Molecular cloning of a novel mitogen-inducible nuclear protein with a Ran GTPase-activating domain that affects cell cycle progression.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 552-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hattori ◽  
N Tsukamoto ◽  
M S Nur-e-Kamal ◽  
B Rubinfeld ◽  
K Iwai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Quiescent State ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Ran Gtpase ◽  
G0 Phase ◽  
Nih 3T3

We have cloned a novel cDNA (Spa-1) which is little expressed in the quiescent state but induced in the interleukin 2-stimulated cycling state of an interleukin 2-responsive murine lymphoid cell line by differential hybridization. Spa-1 mRNA (3.5 kb) was induced in normal lymphocytes following various types of mitogenic stimulation. In normal organs it is preferentially expressed in both fetal and adult lymphohematopoietic tissues. A Spa-1-encoded protein of 68 kDa is localized mostly in the nucleus. Its N-terminal domain is highly homologous to a human Rap1 GTPase-activating protein (GAP), and a fusion protein of this domain (SpanN) indeed exhibited GAP activity for Rap1/Rsr1 but not for Ras or Rho in vitro. Unlike the human Rap1 GAP, however, SpanN also exhibited GAP activity for Ran, so far the only known Ras-related GTPase in the nucleus. In the presence of serum, stable Spa-1 cDNA transfectants of NIH 3T3 cells (NIH/Spa-1) hardly overexpressed Spa-1 (p68), and they grew as normally as did the parental cells. When NIH/Spa-1 cells were serum starved to be arrested in the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle, however, they, unlike the control cells, exhibited progressive Spa-1 p68 accumulation, and following the addition of serum they showed cell death resembling mitotic catastrophes of the S phase during cell cycle progression. The results indicate that the novel nuclear protein Spa-1, with a potentially active Ran GAP domain, severely hampers the mitogen-induced cell cycle progression when abnormally and/or prematurely expressed. Functions of the Spa-1 protein and its regulation are discussed in the context of its possible interaction with the Ran/RCC-1 system, which is involved in the coordinated nuclear functions, including cell division.

scholarly journals Phytosulfokine-.ALPHA., a Peptidyl Plant Growth Factor, Stimulates Cell Cycle Progression in Carrot Non-Embryogenic Cells.

2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Ho EUN ◽  
Suk-Min KO ◽  
Katsumi HIGASHI ◽  
Dennis YEO ◽  
Yoshikatsu MATSUBAYASHI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Embryogenic Cells

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Cycle Progression by Growth Factor-Induced Cell Signaling

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3327
Author(s):  
Zhixiang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Growth Factor Signaling ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
M Phase

The cell cycle is the series of events that take place in a cell, which drives it to divide and produce two new daughter cells. The typical cell cycle in eukaryotes is composed of the following phases: G1, S, G2, and M phase. Cell cycle progression is mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) and their regulatory cyclin subunits. However, the driving force of cell cycle progression is growth factor-initiated signaling pathways that control the activity of various Cdk–cyclin complexes. While the mechanism underlying the role of growth factor signaling in G1 phase of cell cycle progression has been largely revealed due to early extensive research, little is known regarding the function and mechanism of growth factor signaling in regulating other phases of the cell cycle, including S, G2, and M phase. In this review, we briefly discuss the process of cell cycle progression through various phases, and we focus on the role of signaling pathways activated by growth factors and their receptor (mostly receptor tyrosine kinases) in regulating cell cycle progression through various phases.

scholarly journals The Activity of Differentiation Factors Induces Apoptosis in Polyomavirus Large T-Expressing Myoblasts

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1449-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gian Maria Fimia ◽  
Vanesa Gottifredi ◽  
Barbara Bellei ◽  
Maria Rosaria Ricciardi ◽  
Agostino Tafuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Myogenic Differentiation ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor Β ◽  
Large Tumor ◽  
Cycle Progression

It is commonly accepted that pathways that regulate proliferation/differentiation processes, if altered in their normal interplay, can lead to the induction of programmed cell death. In a previous work we reported that Polyoma virus Large Tumor antigen (PyLT) interferes with in vitro terminal differentiation of skeletal myoblasts by binding and inactivating the retinoblastoma antioncogene product. This inhibition occurs after the activation of some early steps of the myogenic program. In the present work we report that myoblasts expressing wild-type PyLT, when subjected to differentiation stimuli, undergo cell death and that this cell death can be defined as apoptosis. Apoptosis in PyLT-expressing myoblasts starts after growth factors removal, is promoted by cell confluence, and is temporally correlated with the expression of early markers of myogenic differentiation. The block of the initial events of myogenesis by transforming growth factor β or basic fibroblast growth factor prevents PyLT-induced apoptosis, while the acceleration of this process by the overexpression of the muscle-regulatory factor MyoD further increases cell death in this system. MyoD can induce PyLT-expressing myoblasts to accumulate RB, p21, and muscle- specific genes but is unable to induce G00arrest. Several markers of different phases of the cell cycle, such as cyclin A, cdk-2, and cdc-2, fail to be down-regulated, indicating the occurrence of cell cycle progression. It has been frequently suggested that apoptosis can result from an unbalanced cell cycle progression in the presence of a contrasting signal, such as growth factor deprivation. Our data involve differentiation pathways, as a further contrasting signal, in the generation of this conflict during myoblast cell apoptosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document