scholarly journals Structure, Subunit Topology, and Actin-binding Activity of the Arp2/3 Complex from Acanthamoeba

1997 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Dyche Mullins ◽  
Walter F. Stafford ◽  
Thomas D. Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Electron Micrographs ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Analytical Ultracentrifugation ◽  
Fluorescent Antibody ◽  
Complex Molecule ◽  
Gel Filtration ◽  
Sedimentation Coefficient ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Filament Bundles

The Arp2/3 complex, first isolated from Acanthamoeba castellani by affinity chromatography on profilin, consists of seven polypeptides; two actinrelated proteins, Arp2 and Arp3; and five apparently novel proteins, p40, p35, p19, p18, and p14 (Machesky et al., 1994). The complex is homogeneous by hydrodynamic criteria with a Stokes' radius of 5.3 nm by gel filtration, sedimentation coefficient of 8.7 S, and molecular mass of 197 kD by analytical ultracentrifugation. The stoichiometry of the subunits is 1:1:1:1:1:1:1, indicating the purified complex contains one copy each of seven polypeptides. In electron micrographs, the complex has a bilobed or horseshoe shape with outer dimensions of ∼13 × 10 nm, and mathematical models of such a shape and size are consistent with the measured hydrodynamic properties. Chemical cross-linking with a battery of cross-linkers of different spacer arm lengths and chemical reactivities identify the following nearest neighbors within the complex: Arp2 and p40; Arp2 and p35; Arp3 and p35; Arp3 and either p18 or p19; and p19 and p14. By fluorescent antibody staining with anti-p40 and -p35, the complex is concentrated in the cortex of the ameba, especially in linear structures, possibly actin filament bundles, that lie perpendicular to the leading edge. Purified Arp2/3 complex binds actin filaments with a Kd of 2.3 μM and a stoichiometry of approximately one complex molecule per actin monomer. In electron micrographs of negatively stained samples, Arp2/3 complex decorates the sides of actin filaments. EDC/NHS cross-links actin to Arp3, p35, and a low molecular weight subunit, p19, p18, or p14. We propose structural and topological models for the Arp2/3 complex and suggest that affinity for actin filaments accounts for the localization of complex subunits to actinrich regions of Acanthamoeba.

scholarly journals Arp2/3 Complex from Acanthamoeba Binds Profilin and Cross-links Actin Filaments

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 841-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Dyche Mullins ◽  
Joseph F. Kelleher ◽  
James Xu ◽  
Thomas D. Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Analytical Ultracentrifugation ◽  
Acanthamoeba Castellanii ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Motile Cells ◽  
Mechanism Of Interaction ◽  
Cross Links

The Arp2/3 complex was first purified from Acanthamoeba castellanii by profilin affinity chromatography. The mechanism of interaction with profilin was unknown but was hypothesized to be mediated by either Arp2 or Arp3. Here we show that the Arp2 subunit of the complex can be chemically cross-linked to the actin-binding site of profilin. By analytical ultracentrifugation, rhodamine-labeled profilin binds Arp2/3 complex with a Kd of 7 μM, an affinity intermediate between the low affinity of profilin for barbed ends of actin filaments and its high affinity for actin monomers. These data suggest the barbed end of Arp2 is exposed, but Arp2 and Arp3 are not packed together in the complex exactly like two actin monomers in a filament. Arp2/3 complex also cross-links actin filaments into small bundles and isotropic networks, which are mechanically stiffer than solutions of actin filaments alone. Arp2/3 complex is concentrated at the leading edge of motileAcanthamoeba, and its localization is distinct from that of α-actinin, another filament cross-linking protein. Based on localization and actin filament nucleation and cross-linking activities, we propose a role for Arp2/3 in determining the structure of the actin filament network at the leading edge of motile cells.

scholarly journals αE-catenin actin-binding domain alters actin filament conformation and regulates binding of nucleation and disassembly factors

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (23) ◽  
pp. 3710-3720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott D. Hansen ◽  
Adam V. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Chung-Yueh Ouyang ◽  
HongJun Liu ◽  
Sabine Pokutta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Filamentous Actin ◽  
Filament Structure ◽  
Actin Binding Domain ◽  
Filament Bundles ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
Cell Cell

The actin-binding protein αE-catenin may contribute to transitions between cell migration and cell–cell adhesion that depend on remodeling the actin cytoskeleton, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We show that the αE-catenin actin-binding domain (ABD) binds cooperatively to individual actin filaments and that binding is accompanied by a conformational change in the actin protomer that affects filament structure. αE-catenin ABD binding limits barbed-end growth, especially in actin filament bundles. αE-catenin ABD inhibits actin filament branching by the Arp2/3 complex and severing by cofilin, both of which contact regions of the actin protomer that are structurally altered by αE-catenin ABD binding. In epithelial cells, there is little correlation between the distribution of αE-catenin and the Arp2/3 complex at developing cell–cell contacts. Our results indicate that αE-catenin binding to filamentous actin favors assembly of unbranched filament bundles that are protected from severing over more dynamic, branched filament arrays.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Actin–Myosin II System in Fish Epidermal Keratocytes: Mechanism of Cell Body Translocation

1997 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatyana M. Svitkina ◽  
Alexander B. Verkhovsky ◽  
Kyle M. McQuade ◽  
Gary G. Borisy
Keyword(s):  
Cell Body ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Myosin Ii ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Supramolecular Organization ◽  
Retrograde Flow ◽  
Body Boundary ◽  
Filament Bundles

While the protrusive event of cell locomotion is thought to be driven by actin polymerization, the mechanism of forward translocation of the cell body is unclear. To elucidate the mechanism of cell body translocation, we analyzed the supramolecular organization of the actin–myosin II system and the dynamics of myosin II in fish epidermal keratocytes. In lamellipodia, long actin filaments formed dense networks with numerous free ends in a brushlike manner near the leading edge. Shorter actin filaments often formed T junctions with longer filaments in the brushlike area, suggesting that new filaments could be nucleated at sides of preexisting filaments or linked to them immediately after nucleation. The polarity of actin filaments was almost uniform, with barbed ends forward throughout most of the lamellipodia but mixed in arc-shaped filament bundles at the lamellipodial/cell body boundary. Myosin II formed discrete clusters of bipolar minifilaments in lamellipodia that increased in size and density towards the cell body boundary and colocalized with actin in boundary bundles. Time-lapse observation demonstrated that myosin clusters appeared in the lamellipodia and remained stationary with respect to the substratum in locomoting cells, but they exhibited retrograde flow in cells tethered in epithelioid colonies. Consequently, both in locomoting and stationary cells, myosin clusters approached the cell body boundary, where they became compressed and aligned, resulting in the formation of boundary bundles. In locomoting cells, the compression was associated with forward displacement of myosin features. These data are not consistent with either sarcomeric or polarized transport mechanisms of cell body translocation. We propose that the forward translocation of the cell body and retrograde flow in the lamellipodia are both driven by contraction of an actin–myosin network in the lamellipodial/cell body transition zone.

scholarly journals Nerve growth cone lamellipodia contain two populations of actin filaments that differ in organization and polarity.

1992 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 1219-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
A K Lewis ◽  
P C Bridgman
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Growth Cone ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Membrane Surface ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Growth Cones ◽  
Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy ◽  
Nerve Growth ◽  
Filament Bundles ◽  
Two Populations

The organization and polarity of actin filaments in neuronal growth cones was studied with negative stain and freeze-etch EM using a permeabilization protocol that caused little detectable change in morphology when cultured nerve growth cones were observed by video-enhanced differential interference contrast microscopy. The lamellipodial actin cytoskeleton was composed of two distinct subpopulations: a population of 40-100-nm-wide filament bundles radiated from the leading edge, and a second population of branching short filaments filled the volume between the dorsal and ventral membrane surfaces. Together, the two populations formed the three-dimensional structural network seen within expanding lamellipodia. Interaction of the actin filaments with the ventral membrane surface occurred along the length of the filaments via membrane associated proteins. The long bundled filament population was primarily involved in these interactions. The filament tips of either population appeared to interact with the membrane only at the leading edge; this interaction was mediated by a globular Triton-insoluble material. Actin filament polarity was determined by decoration with myosin S1 or heavy meromyosin. Previous reports have suggested that the polarity of the actin filaments in motile cells is uniform, with the barbed ends toward the leading edge. We observed that the actin filament polarity within growth cone lamellipodia is not uniform; although the predominant orientation was with the barbed end toward the leading edge (47-56%), 22-25% of the filaments had the opposite orientation with their pointed ends toward the leading edge, and 19-31% ran parallel to the leading edge. The two actin filament populations display distinct polarity profiles: the longer filaments appear to be oriented predominantly with their barbed ends toward the leading edge, whereas the short filaments appear to be randomly oriented. The different length, organization and polarity of the two filament populations suggest that they differ in stability and function. The population of bundled long filaments, which appeared to be more ventrally located and in contact with membrane proteins, may be more stable than the population of short branched filaments. The location, organization, and polarity of the long bundled filaments suggest that they may be necessary for the expansion of lamellipodia and for the production of tension mediated by receptors to substrate adhesion molecules.

scholarly journals Isolation and characterization of two forms of a cytoskeleton.

1979 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
K T Edds
Keyword(s):  
Sea Urchin ◽  
Electron Micrographs ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Strongylocentrotus Droebachiensis ◽  
Major Protein ◽  
Molecular Weights ◽  
Isolation And Characterization ◽  
Filament Bundles

Isolated petaloid coelomocytes from the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis transform to a filopodial morphology in hypotonic media. Electron micrographs of negatively stained Triton-insoluble cytoskeletons show that the petaloid form consists of a loose net of microfilaments while the filopodial form consists of paracrystalline bundles of microfilaments. Actin is the major protein of both forms of the cytoskeleton. Additional polypeptides have molecular weights of approximately 220,000, 64,000, 57,000, and 27,000 daltons. Relative to actin the filopodial cytoskeletons have an average of 2.5 times as much 57k polypeptide as the petaloid cytoskeletons. Treatment with 0.25 M NaCl dissociates the filament bundles into individual actin filaments free of the actin-associated polypeptides. Thus, one or more of these actin-associated polypeptides may be responsible for crosslinking the actin filaments into bundles and maintaining the three-dimensional nature of the cytoskeletons.

scholarly journals Formation of actin filament bundles in the ring canals of developing Drosophila follicles.

1996 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
L G Tilney ◽  
M S Tilney ◽  
G M Guild
Keyword(s):  
Actin Filament ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Nurse Cells ◽  
Ring Canal ◽  
Contractile Ring ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
Development Stages ◽  
Ring Canals ◽  
Filament Bundles

Growing the intracellular bridges that connect nurse cells with each o ther and to the developing oocyte is vital for egg development. These ring canals increase from 0.5 microns in diameter at stage 2 to 10 microns in diameter at stage 11. Thin sections cut horizontally as you would cut a bagel, show that there is a layer of circumferentially oriented actin filaments attached to the plasma membrane at the periphery of each canal. By decoration with subfragment 1 of myosin we find actin filaments of mixed polarities in the ring such as found in the "contractile ring" formed during cytokinesis. In vertical sections through the canal the actin filaments appear as dense dots. At stage 2 there are 82 actin filaments in the ring, by stage 6 there are 717 and by stage 10 there are 726. Taking into account the diameter, this indicates that there is 170 microns of actin filaments/canal at stage 2 (pi x 0.5 microns x 82), 14,000 microns at stage 9 and approximately 23,000 microns at stage 11 or one inch of actin filament! The density of actin filaments remains unchanged throughout development. What is particularly striking is that by stages 4-5, the ring of actin filaments has achieved its maximum thickness, even though the diameter has not yet increased significantly. Thereafter, the diameter increases. Throughout development, stages 2-11, the canal length also increases. Although the density (number of actin filaments/micron2) through a canal remains constant from stage 5 on, the actin filaments appear as a net of interconnected bundles. Further information on this net of bundles comes from studying mutant animals that lack kelch, a protein located in the ring canal that has homology to the actin binding protein, scruin. In this mutant, the actin filaments form normally but individual bundles that comprise the fibers of the net are not bound tightly together. Some bundles enter into the ring canal lumen but do not completely occlude the lumen. all these observations lay the groundwork for our understanding of how a noncontractile ring increases in thickness, diameter, and length during development.

scholarly journals Lymphoma Thy-1 glycoprotein is linked to the cytoskeleton via a 4.1-like protein.

1986 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 2529-2540 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Y Bourguignon ◽  
S J Suchard ◽  
E L Kalomiris
Keyword(s):  
T Lymphocyte ◽  
Phorbol Ester ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Sedimentation Coefficient ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Pivotal Role ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Lymphoma Cells ◽  
T Lymphoma Cells ◽  
T Lymphoma

In this study we have found that the phosphoprotein doublet of 68,000 and 65,000 daltons (68/65 kD) in mouse T-lymphoma cells shares several structural and functional similarities with erythrocyte band 4.1. Our evidence for identifying the 68/65-kD doublet as a lymphoma 4.1-like protein is as follows: it displays an immunological cross-reactivity with anti-erythrocyte band 4.1 antibody; it exhibits a Svedberg unit of sedimentation coefficient of 4 S; it is phosphorylated in the presence of phorbol ester (phorbol-12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate) and its phosphorylation requires Ca2+; it is phosphorylated primarily at serine residues; and it can bind directly to fodrin (a spectrin-like actin-binding protein). In addition, this lymphoma 4.1-like protein can be both colocalized and coisolated with the major T-lymphocyte-specific glycoprotein, Thy-1 (gp 25). Therefore, all of these results strongly suggest that the lymphoma 4.1-like protein (68/65-kD doublet) may play a pivotal role in linking the Thy-1 (gp 25) glycoprotein to fodrin which, in turn, binds to the actin filaments that are responsible for recruiting Thy-1 antigens into cap structures.

scholarly journals PakB binds to the SH3 domain of Dictyostelium Abp1 and regulates its effects on cell polarity and early development

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 2216-2227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yidai Yang ◽  
Marc de la Roche ◽  
Scott W. Crawley ◽  
Zhihao Li ◽  
Emilia Furmaniak-Kazmierczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Development ◽  
Actin Filaments ◽  
Cellular Localization ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Sh3 Domain ◽  
Cell Polarization ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Filamentous Actin ◽  
P21 Activated Kinase

Dictyostelium p21-activated kinase B (PakB) phosphorylates and activates class I myosins. PakB colocalizes with myosin I to actin-rich regions of the cell, including macropinocytic and phagocytic cups and the leading edge of migrating cells. Here we show that residues 1–180 mediate the cellular localization of PakB. Yeast two-hybrid and pull-down experiments identify two proline-rich motifs in PakB-1-180 that directly interact with the SH3 domain of Dictyostelium actin-binding protein 1 (dAbp1). dAbp1 colocalizes with PakB to actin-rich regions in the cell. The loss of dAbp1 does not affect the cellular distribution of PakB, whereas the loss of PakB causes dAbp1 to adopt a diffuse cytosolic distribution. Cosedimentation studies show that the N-terminal region of PakB (residues 1–70) binds directly to actin filaments, whereas dAbp1 exhibits only a low affinity for filamentous actin. PakB-1-180 significantly enhances the binding of dAbp1 to actin filaments. When overexpressed in PakB-null cells, dAbp1 completely blocks early development at the aggregation stage, prevents cell polarization, and significantly reduces chemotaxis rates. The inhibitory effects are abrogated by the introduction of a function-blocking mutation into the dAbp1 SH3 domain. We conclude that PakB plays a critical role in regulating the cellular functions of dAbp1, which are mediated largely by its SH3 domain.

How nematode sperm crawl

2002 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 367-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean Bottino ◽  
Alexander Mogilner ◽  
Tom Roberts ◽  
Murray Stewart ◽  
George Oster
Keyword(s):  
Cell Motility ◽  
Molecular Motors ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Element Model ◽  
Basic Mechanism ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Major Sperm Protein ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Amoeboid Motility ◽  
Filament Bundles

Sperm of the nematode, Ascaris suum, crawl using lamellipodial protrusion, adhesion and retraction, a process analogous to the amoeboid motility of other eukaryotic cells. However, rather than employing an actin cytoskeleton to generate locomotion, nematode sperm use the major sperm protein (MSP). Moreover, nematode sperm lack detectable molecular motors or the battery of actin-binding proteins that characterize actin-based motility. The Ascaris system provides a simple ‘stripped down’ version of a crawling cell in which to examine the basic mechanism of cell locomotion independently of other cellular functions that involve the cytoskeleton. Here we present a mechanochemical analysis of crawling in Ascaris sperm. We construct a finite element model wherein (a) localized filament polymerization and bundling generate the force for lamellipodial extension and (b) energy stored in the gel formed from the filament bundles at the leading edge is subsequently used to produce the contraction that pulls the rear of the cell forward. The model reproduces the major features of crawling sperm and provides a framework in which amoeboid cell motility can be analyzed. Although the model refers primarily to the locomotion of nematode sperm, it has important implications for the mechanics of actin-based cell motility.Movies available on-line.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document