scholarly journals Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome–microtubule attachment in budding yeast

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Gillett ◽  
Christopher W. Espelin ◽  
Peter K. Sorger
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Evolutionary Divergence ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
The Status ◽  
Assembly Pathways ◽  
Normal Cell Cycle

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on precise regulation of mitosis by the spindle checkpoint. This checkpoint monitors the status of kinetochore–microtubule attachment and delays the metaphase to anaphase transition until all kinetochores have formed stable bipolar connections to the mitotic spindle. Components of the spindle checkpoint include the mitotic arrest defective (MAD) genes MAD1–3, and the budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (BUB) genes BUB1 and BUB3. In animal cells, all known spindle checkpoint proteins are recruited to kinetochores during normal mitoses. In contrast, we show that whereas Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bub1p and Bub3p are bound to kinetochores early in mitosis as part of the normal cell cycle, Mad1p and Mad2p are kinetochore bound only in the presence of spindle damage or kinetochore lesions that interfere with chromosome–microtubule attachment. Moreover, although Mad1p and Mad2p perform essential mitotic functions during every division cycle in mammalian cells, they are required in budding yeast only when mitosis goes awry. We propose that differences in the behavior of spindle checkpoint proteins in animal cells and budding yeast result primarily from evolutionary divergence in spindle assembly pathways.

scholarly journals MAD1-dependent recruitment of CDK1-CCNB1 to kinetochores promotes spindle checkpoint signaling

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (4) ◽  
pp. 1108-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Alfonso-Pérez ◽  
Daniel Hayward ◽  
James Holder ◽  
Ulrike Gruneberg ◽  
Francis A. Barr
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Upstream Regulator ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Integral Component ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Cyclin B–dependent kinase (CDK1-CCNB1) promotes entry into mitosis. Additionally, it inhibits mitotic exit by activating the spindle checkpoint. This latter role is mediated through phosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase MPS1 and other spindle checkpoint proteins. We find that CDK1-CCNB1 localizes to unattached kinetochores and like MPS1 is lost from these structures upon microtubule attachment. This suggests that CDK1-CCNB1 is an integral component and not only an upstream regulator of the spindle checkpoint pathway. Complementary proteomic and cell biological analysis demonstrate that the spindle checkpoint protein MAD1 is one of the major components of CCNB1 complexes, and that CCNB1 is recruited to unattached kinetochores in an MPS1-dependent fashion through interaction with the first 100 amino acids of MAD1. This MPS1 and MAD1-dependent pool of CDK1-CCNB1 creates a positive feedback loop necessary for timely recruitment of MPS1 to kinetochores during mitotic entry and for sustained spindle checkpoint arrest. CDK1-CCNB1 is therefore an integral component of the spindle checkpoint, ensuring the fidelity of mitosis.

scholarly journals MAD3 Encodes a Novel Component of the Spindle Checkpoint Which Interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p

2000 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 871-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin G. Hardwick ◽  
Raymond C. Johnston ◽  
Dana L. Smith ◽  
Andrew W. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Sequence Analysis ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Terminal Region ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Two Hybrid

We show that MAD3 encodes a novel 58-kD nuclear protein which is not essential for viability, but is an integral component of the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Sequence analysis reveals two regions of Mad3p that are 46 and 47% identical to sequences in the NH2-terminal region of the budding yeast Bub1 protein kinase. Bub1p is known to bind Bub3p (Roberts et al. 1994) and we use two-hybrid assays and coimmunoprecipitation experiments to show that Mad3p can also bind to Bub3p. In addition, we find that Mad3p interacts with Mad2p and the cell cycle regulator Cdc20p. We show that the two regions of homology between Mad3p and Bub1p are crucial for these interactions and identify loss of function mutations within each domain of Mad3p. We discuss roles for Mad3p and its interactions with other spindle checkpoint proteins and with Cdc20p, the target of the checkpoint.

scholarly journals Two Complexes of Spindle Checkpoint Proteins Containing Cdc20 and Mad2 Assemble during Mitosis Independently of the Kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atasi Poddar ◽  
P. Todd Stukenberg ◽  
Daniel J. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT Favored models of spindle checkpoint signaling propose that two inhibitory complexes (Mad2-Cdc20 and Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20) must be assembled at kinetochores in order to inhibit mitosis. We have directly tested this model in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The proteins Mad2, Mad3, Bub3, Cdc20, and Cdc27 in yeast were quantified, and there are sufficient amounts to form stoichiometric inhibitors of Cdc20 and the anaphase-promoting complex. Mad2 is present in two separate complexes in cells arrested in mitosis with nocodazole. There is a small amount of Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20 and a much larger amount of a complex that contains Mad2-Cdc20. We use conditional mutants to show that both Mad2 and Mad3 are essential for establishment and maintenance of the spindle checkpoint. Both spindle checkpoint complexes containing Mad2 form in mitosis, not in response to checkpoint activation. The kinetochore is not required to form either complex. We propose that the conversion of Mad1-Mad2 to Cdc20-Mad2, a key step in generating inhibitory checkpoint complexes, is limited to mitosis by the availability of Cdc20 and is kinetochore independent.

scholarly journals Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores inDrosophilacells

2004 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 1757-1771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Logarinho ◽  
Hassan Bousbaa ◽  
José Miguel Dias ◽  
Carla Lopes ◽  
Isabel Amorim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Microtubule Attachment

scholarly journals The Nup107-160 Nucleoporin Complex Is Required for Correct Bipolar Spindle Assembly

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3806-3818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arturo V. Orjalo ◽  
Alexei Arnaoutov ◽  
Zhouxin Shen ◽  
Yekaterina Boyarchuk ◽  
Samantha G. Zeitlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Sperm Chromatin ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

The Nup107-160 complex is a critical subunit of the nuclear pore. This complex localizes to kinetochores in mitotic mammalian cells, where its function is unknown. To examine Nup107-160 complex recruitment to kinetochores, we stained human cells with antisera to four complex components. Each antibody stained not only kinetochores but also prometaphase spindle poles and proximal spindle fibers, mirroring the dual prometaphase localization of the spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and Cdc20. Indeed, expanded crescents of the Nup107-160 complex encircled unattached kinetochores, similar to the hyperaccumulation observed of dynamic outer kinetochore checkpoint proteins and motors at unattached kinetochores. In mitotic Xenopus egg extracts, the Nup107-160 complex localized throughout reconstituted spindles. When the Nup107-160 complex was depleted from extracts, the spindle checkpoint remained intact, but spindle assembly was rendered strikingly defective. Microtubule nucleation around sperm centrosomes seemed normal, but the microtubules quickly disassembled, leaving largely unattached sperm chromatin. Notably, Ran-GTP caused normal assembly of microtubule asters in depleted extracts, indicating that this defect was upstream of Ran or independent of it. We conclude that the Nup107-160 complex is dynamic in mitosis and that it promotes spindle assembly in a manner that is distinct from its functions at interphase nuclear pores.

scholarly journals The Spindle Checkpoint of Budding Yeast Depends on a Tight Complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 Proteins

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2607-2618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rey-Huei Chen ◽  
D. Michelle Brady ◽  
Dana Smith ◽  
Andrew W. Murray ◽  
Kevin G. Hardwick
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Amino Acids ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Gel Filtration ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Sds Page

The spindle checkpoint arrests the cell cycle at metaphase in the presence of defects in the mitotic spindle or in the attachment of chromosomes to the spindle. When spindle assembly is disrupted, the budding yeast mad and bub mutants fail to arrest and rapidly lose viability. We have cloned the MAD2 gene, which encodes a protein of 196 amino acids that remains at a constant level during the cell cycle. Gel filtration and co-immunoprecipitation analyses reveal that Mad2p tightly associates with another spindle checkpoint component, Mad1p. This association is independent of cell cycle stage and the presence or absence of other known checkpoint proteins. In addition, Mad2p binds to all of the different phosphorylated isoforms of Mad1p that can be resolved on SDS-PAGE. Deletion and mutational analysis of both proteins indicate that association of Mad2p with Mad1p is critical for checkpoint function and for hyperphosphorylation of Mad1p.

scholarly journals Relative contributions of chromatin and kinetochores to mitotic spindle assembly

2009 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. O'Connell ◽  
Jadranka Lončarek ◽  
Petr Kaláb ◽  
Alexey Khodjakov
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Dominant Role ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Assembly ◽  
Assembly Pathways ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis ◽  
Normal Mitosis

During mitosis and meiosis in animal cells, chromosomes actively participate in spindle assembly by generating a gradient of Ran guanosine triphosphate (RanGTP). A high concentration of RanGTP promotes microtubule nucleation and stabilization in the vicinity of chromatin. However, the relative contributions of chromosome arms and centromeres/kinetochores in this process are not known. In this study, we address this issue using cells undergoing mitosis with unreplicated genomes (MUG). During MUG, chromatin is rapidly separated from the forming spindle, and both centrosomal and noncentrosomal spindle assembly pathways are active. MUG chromatin is coated with RCC1 and establishes a RanGTP gradient. However, a robust spindle forms around kinetochores/centromeres outside of the gradient peak. When stable kinetochore microtubule attachment is prevented by Nuf2 depletion in both MUG and normal mitosis, chromatin attracts astral microtubules but cannot induce spindle assembly. These results support a model in which kinetochores play the dominant role in the chromosome-mediated pathway of mitotic spindle assembly.

scholarly journals Multiple assembly mechanisms anchor the KMN spindle checkpoint platform at human mitotic kinetochores

2015 ◽  
Vol 208 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soonjoung Kim ◽  
Hongtao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Multiple Strategies ◽  
Complete Inactivation ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Ndc80 Complex ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Multiple Assembly

During mitosis, the spindle checkpoint senses kinetochores not properly attached to spindle microtubules and prevents precocious sister-chromatid separation and aneuploidy. The constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) at inner kinetochores anchors the KMN network consisting of Knl1, the Mis12 complex (Mis12C), and the Ndc80 complex (Ndc80C) at outer kinetochores. KMN is a critical kinetochore receptor for both microtubules and checkpoint proteins. Here, we show that nearly complete inactivation of KMN in human cells through multiple strategies produced strong checkpoint defects even when all kinetochores lacked microtubule attachment. These KMN-inactivating strategies reveal multiple KMN assembly mechanisms at human mitotic kinetochores. In one mechanism, the centromeric kinase Aurora B phosphorylates Mis12C and strengthens its binding to the CCAN subunit CENP-C. In another, CENP-T contributes to KMN attachment in a CENP-H-I-K–dependent manner. Our study provides insights into the mechanisms of mitosis-specific assembly of the checkpoint platform KMN at human kinetochores.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document