scholarly journals MAD1-dependent recruitment of CDK1-CCNB1 to kinetochores promotes spindle checkpoint signaling

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (4) ◽  
pp. 1108-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Alfonso-Pérez ◽  
Daniel Hayward ◽  
James Holder ◽  
Ulrike Gruneberg ◽  
Francis A. Barr
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Upstream Regulator ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Integral Component ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Cyclin B–dependent kinase (CDK1-CCNB1) promotes entry into mitosis. Additionally, it inhibits mitotic exit by activating the spindle checkpoint. This latter role is mediated through phosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase MPS1 and other spindle checkpoint proteins. We find that CDK1-CCNB1 localizes to unattached kinetochores and like MPS1 is lost from these structures upon microtubule attachment. This suggests that CDK1-CCNB1 is an integral component and not only an upstream regulator of the spindle checkpoint pathway. Complementary proteomic and cell biological analysis demonstrate that the spindle checkpoint protein MAD1 is one of the major components of CCNB1 complexes, and that CCNB1 is recruited to unattached kinetochores in an MPS1-dependent fashion through interaction with the first 100 amino acids of MAD1. This MPS1 and MAD1-dependent pool of CDK1-CCNB1 creates a positive feedback loop necessary for timely recruitment of MPS1 to kinetochores during mitotic entry and for sustained spindle checkpoint arrest. CDK1-CCNB1 is therefore an integral component of the spindle checkpoint, ensuring the fidelity of mitosis.

scholarly journals Loading of the 3F3/2 Antigen onto Kinetochores Is Dependent on the Ordered Assembly of the Spindle Checkpoint Proteins

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 4390-4399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oi Kwan Wong ◽  
Guowei Fang
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Assembly Pathway ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Unknown Protein ◽  
Ordered Assembly

Accurate chromosome segregation is controlled by the spindle checkpoint, which responds to the lack of microtubule–kinetochore attachment or of tension across sister kinetochores through phosphorylation of kinetochore proteins by the Mps1, Bub1, BubR1, Aurora B, and Plk1/Plx1 kinases. The presence of the 3F3/2 phosphoepitope on kinetochores, generated by Plk1/Plx1-mediated phosphorylation of an unknown protein, correlates with the activation of the tension-sensitive checkpoint pathway. Using immunodepletion approach and a rephosphorylation assay in Xenopus extracts, we report here that not only the formation of the 3F3/2 phosphoepitope is dependent on the checkpoint activation but also the loading of the 3F3/2 substrate to kinetochores requires the prior assembly of Mps1, Bub1 and BubR1 onto kinetochores. Interestingly, generation of the 3F3/2 epitope in checkpoint extracts requires the kinase activities of Mps1 and Bub1 but not that of BubR1. Furthermore, we demonstrate that checkpoint proteins in Xenopusextracts are assembled onto kinetochores in a highly ordered pathway consisting of three steps. Mps1 and Bub1 are loaded first, and BubR1 and Plx1 second, followed by Mad1 and Mad2. The characterization of this ordered assembly pathway provides a framework for the biochemical mechanism of the checkpoint signaling and will aid in the eventual identification of the 3F3/2 substrate.

scholarly journals The ESCRT protein Chmp4c regulates mitotic spindle checkpoint signaling

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (3) ◽  
pp. 861-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Petsalaki ◽  
Maria Dandoulaki ◽  
George Zachos
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Membrane Remodeling ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Endosomal Sorting ◽  
Anaphase Onset

The mitotic spindle checkpoint delays anaphase onset in the presence of unattached kinetochores, and efficient checkpoint signaling requires kinetochore localization of the Rod–ZW10–Zwilch (RZZ) complex. In the present study, we show that human Chmp4c, a protein involved in membrane remodeling, localizes to kinetochores in prometaphase but is reduced in chromosomes aligned at the metaphase plate. Chmp4c promotes stable kinetochore–microtubule attachments and is required for proper mitotic progression, faithful chromosome alignment, and segregation. Depletion of Chmp4c diminishes localization of RZZ and Mad1-Mad2 checkpoint proteins to prometaphase kinetochores and impairs mitotic arrest when microtubules are depolymerized by nocodazole. Furthermore, Chmp4c binds to ZW10 through a small C-terminal region, and constitutive Chmp4c kinetochore targeting causes a ZW10-dependent checkpoint metaphase arrest. In addition, Chmp4c spindle functions do not require endosomal sorting complex required for transport–dependent membrane remodeling. These results show that Chmp4c regulates the mitotic spindle checkpoint by promoting localization of the RZZ complex to unattached kinetochores.

scholarly journals Phosphatase-Regulated Recruitment of the Spindle and Kinetochore Associated (SKA) Complex to Kinetochores

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushama Sivakumar ◽  
Gary J. Gorbsky
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Mitotic Kinases ◽  
Feedback Cycle ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Phosphatase 2A ◽  
Summary Statement ◽  
And Function

ABSTRACTKinetochores move chromosomes on dynamic spindle microtubules and regulate cell cycle progression by signaling the spindle checkpoint. The Spindle and Kinetochore-Associated (Ska) Complex, a hexamer composed of two copies of Ska1, Ska2 and Ska3, participates in both roles. The mitotic kinases, Cdk1, Aurora B, Plk1, Mps1 and Bub1 play key, overlapping tasks in regulating chromosome movement and checkpoint signaling. However, roles for the phosphatases that oppose these kinases are more poorly defined. Recently, we showed that Ska1 is important for recruiting protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to kinetochores. Here we show that PP1 and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) both promote accumulation of Ska at kinetochores. Depletion of PP1 or PP2A by siRNA reduces Ska binding at kinetochores, impairs alignment of chromosomes to the spindle midplane, and causes metaphase delay or arrest, phenotypes also seen after depletion of Ska. Tethering of PP1 to the kinetochore protein Nuf2 promotes Ska recruitment to kinetochores, and reduces mitotic defects seen after Ska depletion. We propose that kinetochore-associated phosphatases generate a positive feedback cycle to reinforce Ska complex accumulation and function at kinetochores.SUMMARY STATEMENTPhosphatases reinforce recruitment of the Ska complex at kinetochores to stabilize microtubule attachment and oppose spindle checkpoint signaling.

scholarly journals Two Complexes of Spindle Checkpoint Proteins Containing Cdc20 and Mad2 Assemble during Mitosis Independently of the Kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atasi Poddar ◽  
P. Todd Stukenberg ◽  
Daniel J. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT Favored models of spindle checkpoint signaling propose that two inhibitory complexes (Mad2-Cdc20 and Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20) must be assembled at kinetochores in order to inhibit mitosis. We have directly tested this model in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The proteins Mad2, Mad3, Bub3, Cdc20, and Cdc27 in yeast were quantified, and there are sufficient amounts to form stoichiometric inhibitors of Cdc20 and the anaphase-promoting complex. Mad2 is present in two separate complexes in cells arrested in mitosis with nocodazole. There is a small amount of Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20 and a much larger amount of a complex that contains Mad2-Cdc20. We use conditional mutants to show that both Mad2 and Mad3 are essential for establishment and maintenance of the spindle checkpoint. Both spindle checkpoint complexes containing Mad2 form in mitosis, not in response to checkpoint activation. The kinetochore is not required to form either complex. We propose that the conversion of Mad1-Mad2 to Cdc20-Mad2, a key step in generating inhibitory checkpoint complexes, is limited to mitosis by the availability of Cdc20 and is kinetochore independent.

scholarly journals Kinetochore-localized BUB-1/BUB-3 complex promotes anaphase onset in C. elegans

2015 ◽  
Vol 209 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taekyung Kim ◽  
Mark W. Moyle ◽  
Pablo Lara-Gonzalez ◽  
Christian De Groot ◽  
Karen Oegema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Kinetochore Region

The conserved Bub1/Bub3 complex is recruited to the kinetochore region of mitotic chromosomes, where it initiates spindle checkpoint signaling and promotes chromosome alignment. Here we show that, in contrast to the expectation for a checkpoint pathway component, the BUB-1/BUB-3 complex promotes timely anaphase onset in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. This activity of BUB-1/BUB-3 was independent of spindle checkpoint signaling but required kinetochore localization. BUB-1/BUB-3 inhibition equivalently delayed separase activation and other events occurring during mitotic exit. The anaphase promotion function required BUB-1’s kinase domain, but not its kinase activity, and this function was independent of the role of BUB-1/BUB-3 in chromosome alignment. These results reveal an unexpected role for the BUB-1/BUB-3 complex in promoting anaphase onset that is distinct from its well-studied functions in checkpoint signaling and chromosome alignment, and suggest a new mechanism contributing to the coordination of the metaphase-to-anaphase transition.

scholarly journals Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome–microtubule attachment in budding yeast

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Gillett ◽  
Christopher W. Espelin ◽  
Peter K. Sorger
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Evolutionary Divergence ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
The Status ◽  
Assembly Pathways ◽  
Normal Cell Cycle

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on precise regulation of mitosis by the spindle checkpoint. This checkpoint monitors the status of kinetochore–microtubule attachment and delays the metaphase to anaphase transition until all kinetochores have formed stable bipolar connections to the mitotic spindle. Components of the spindle checkpoint include the mitotic arrest defective (MAD) genes MAD1–3, and the budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (BUB) genes BUB1 and BUB3. In animal cells, all known spindle checkpoint proteins are recruited to kinetochores during normal mitoses. In contrast, we show that whereas Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bub1p and Bub3p are bound to kinetochores early in mitosis as part of the normal cell cycle, Mad1p and Mad2p are kinetochore bound only in the presence of spindle damage or kinetochore lesions that interfere with chromosome–microtubule attachment. Moreover, although Mad1p and Mad2p perform essential mitotic functions during every division cycle in mammalian cells, they are required in budding yeast only when mitosis goes awry. We propose that differences in the behavior of spindle checkpoint proteins in animal cells and budding yeast result primarily from evolutionary divergence in spindle assembly pathways.

scholarly journals Different spindle checkpoint proteins monitor microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores inDrosophilacells

2004 ◽  
Vol 117 (9) ◽  
pp. 1757-1771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Logarinho ◽  
Hassan Bousbaa ◽  
José Miguel Dias ◽  
Carla Lopes ◽  
Isabel Amorim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Microtubule Attachment

scholarly journals IBD2 Encodes a Novel Component of the Bub2p-Dependent Spindle Checkpoint in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-609
Author(s):  
Hyung-Seo Hwang ◽  
Kiwon Song
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Essential Gene ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Arrest ◽  
Mitotic Exit ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway

Abstract During mitosis, genomic integrity is maintained by the proper coordination of mitotic events through the spindle checkpoint. The bifurcated spindle checkpoint blocks cell cycle progression at metaphase by monitoring unattached kinetochores and inhibits mitotic exit in response to the incorrect orientation of the mitotic spindle. Bfa1p is a spindle checkpoint regulator of budding yeast in the Bub2p checkpoint pathway for proper mitotic exit. We have isolated a novel Bfa1p interacting protein named Ibd2p in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that IBD2 (Inhibition of Bud Division 2) is not an essential gene but its deletion mutant proceeded through the cell cycle in the presence of microtubule-destabilizing drugs, thereby inducing a sharp decrease in viability. In addition, overexpression of Mps1p caused partial mitotic arrest in ibd2Δ as well as in bub2Δ, suggesting that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint downstream of MPS1. Overexpression of Ibd2p induced mitotic arrest with increased levels of Clb2p in wild type and mad2Δ, but not in deletion mutants of BUB2 and BFA1. Pds1p was also stabilized by the overexpression of Ibd2p in wild-type cells. The mitotic arrest defects observed in ibd2Δ in the presence of nocodazole were restored by additional copies of BUB2, BFA1, and CDC5, whereas an extra copy of IBD2 could not rescue the mitotic arrest defects of bub2Δ and bfa1Δ. The mitotic arrest defects of ibd2Δ were not recovered by MAD2, or vice versa. Analysis of the double mutant combinations ibd2Δmad2Δ, ibd2Δbub2Δ, and ibd2Δdyn1Δ showed that IBD2 belongs to the BUB2 epistasis group. Taken together, these data demonstrate that IBD2 encodes a novel component of the BUB2-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway that functions upstream of BUB2 and BFA1.

scholarly journals Mad2 and BubR1 Function in a Single Checkpoint Pathway that Responds to a Loss of Tension

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 3706-3719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie B. Shannon ◽  
Julie C. Canman ◽  
E. D. Salmon
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Normal Numbers ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Chromosome Congression ◽  
Full Complement ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

The spindle checkpoint monitors microtubule attachment and tension at kinetochores to ensure proper chromosome segregation. Previously, PtK1 cells in hypothermic conditions (23°C) were shown to have a pronounced mitotic delay, despite having normal numbers of kinetochore microtubules. At 23°C, we found that PtK1 cells remained in metaphase for an average of 101 min, compared with 21 min for cells at 37°C. The metaphase delay at 23°C was abrogated by injection of Mad2 inhibitors, showing that Mad2 and the spindle checkpoint were responsible for the prolonged metaphase. Live cell imaging showed that kinetochore Mad2 became undetectable soon after chromosome congression. Measurements of the stretch between sister kinetochores at metaphase found a 24% decrease in tension at 23°C, and metaphase kinetochores at 23°C exhibited higher levels of 3F3/2, Bub1, and BubR1 compared with 37°C. Microinjection of anti-BubR1 antibody abolished the metaphase delay at 23°C, indicating that the higher kinetochore levels of BubR1 may contribute to the delay. Disrupting both Mad2 and BubR1 function induced anaphase with the same timing as single inhibitions, suggesting that these checkpoint genes function in the same pathway. We conclude that reduced tension at kinetochores with a full complement of kinetochore microtubules induces a checkpoint dependent metaphase delay associated with elevated amounts of kinetochore 3F3/2, Bub1, and BubR1 labeling.

scholarly journals Polo-like kinase-1 regulates kinetochore–microtubule dynamics and spindle checkpoint silencing

2012 ◽  
Vol 198 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Liu ◽  
Olga Davydenko ◽  
Michael A. Lampson
Keyword(s):  
High Activity ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Arrest ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
Signaling Proteins ◽  
Dynamic Localization ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Microtubule Attachment

Polo-like kinase-1 (Plk1) is a highly conserved kinase with multiple mitotic functions. Plk1 localizes to prometaphase kinetochores and is reduced at metaphase kinetochores, similar to many checkpoint signaling proteins, but Plk1 is not required for spindle checkpoint function. Plk1 is also implicated in stabilizing kinetochore–microtubule attachments, but these attachments are most stable when kinetochore Plk1 levels are low at metaphase. Therefore, it is unclear how Plk1 function at kinetochores can be understood in the context of its dynamic localization. In this paper, we show that Plk1 activity suppresses kinetochore–microtubule dynamics to stabilize initial attachments in prometaphase, and Plk1 removal from kinetochores is necessary to maintain dynamic microtubules in metaphase. Constitutively targeting Plk1 to kinetochores maintained high activity at metaphase, leading to reduced interkinetochore tension and intrakinetochore stretch, a checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest, and accumulation of microtubule attachment errors. Together, our data show that Plk1 dynamics at kinetochores control two critical mitotic processes: initially establishing correct kinetochore–microtubule attachments and subsequently silencing the spindle checkpoint.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document