scholarly journals The budding yeast PP2ACdc55 protein phosphatase prevents the onset of anaphase in response to morphogenetic defects

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Chiroli ◽  
Valentina Rossio ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Simonetta Piatti
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Chromosome Transmission ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Noncanonical Pathway

Faithful chromosome transmission requires establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase, followed by its removal at anaphase onset. Sister chromatids are tethered together by cohesin, which is displaced from chromosomes through cleavage of its Mcd1 subunit by the separase protease. Separase is in turn inhibited, up to this moment, by securin. Budding yeast cells respond to morphogenetic defects by a transient arrest in G2 with high securin levels and unseparated chromatids. We show that neither securin elimination nor forced cohesin cleavage is sufficient for anaphase in these conditions, suggesting that other factors contribute to cohesion maintainance in G2. We find that the protein phosphatase PP2A bound to its regulatory subunit Cdc55 plays a key role in this process, uncovering a new function for PP2ACdc55 in controlling a noncanonical pathway of chromatid cohesion removal.

scholarly journals Scc2-mediated loading of cohesin onto chromosomes in G1 yeast cells is insufficient to build cohesion during S phase

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim A Nasmyth
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
De Novo ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Previous Conclusion ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Cohesin Subunit

SummarySister chromatids are held together from their replication until mitosis. Sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by the ring-shaped cohesin complex and it is thought that cohesin holds sister chromatids together by entrapping sister DNAs within the cohesin ring (Haering et al., 2008). However, how this occurs is not well understood. Because cohesin binds to DNA prior to replication it is possible that the replication fork passes through the lumen of the ring thereby placing replicated sisters inside cohesin rings. If this is the case, loading of cohesin in the G1 phase may be sufficient to build cohesion.We show here that Scc2, a cohesin subunit required for loading cohesin onto chromosomes de novo, is necessary for establishment of cohesion even after Scc2-mediated loading has already taken place during late G1 or early S phase. Our results challenge a previous conclusion based on related experiments whereby Scc2 was found not to be required for cohesion establishment during S phase (Lengronne et al., 2006).

scholarly journals Cdc55 coordinates spindle assembly and chromosome disjunction during meiosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 193 (7) ◽  
pp. 1213-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid Bizzari ◽  
Adele L. Marston
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Deoxyribonucleic Acid ◽  
Nuclear Division ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Phosphatase 2A ◽  
Meiosis I ◽  
Sequential Assembly

During meiosis, two consecutive nuclear divisions follow a single round of deoxyribonucleic acid replication. In meiosis I, homologues are segregated, whereas in meiosis II, sister chromatids are segregated. This requires that the sequential assembly and dissolution of specialized chromosomal factors are coordinated with two rounds of spindle assembly and disassembly. How these events are coupled is unknown. In this paper, we show, in budding yeast, that the protein phosphatase 2A regulatory subunit Cdc55 couples the loss of linkages between chromosomes with nuclear division by restraining two other phosphatases, Cdc14 and PP2ARts1. Cdc55 maintains Cdc14 sequestration in the nucleolus during early meiosis, and this is essential for the assembly of the meiosis I spindle but not for chromosomes to separate. Cdc55 also limits the formation of PP2A holocomplexes containing the alternative regulatory subunit Rts1, which is crucial for the timely dissolution of sister chromatid cohesion. Therefore, Cdc55 orders passage through the meiotic divisions by ensuring a balance of phosphatases.

scholarly journals Evidence for cohesin sliding along budding yeast chromosomes

Open Biology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 150178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Ocampo-Hafalla ◽  
Sofía Muñoz ◽  
Catarina P. Samora ◽  
Frank Uhlmann
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Transcription Termination ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Active Genes

The ring-shaped cohesin complex is thought to topologically hold sister chromatids together from their synthesis in S phase until chromosome segregation in mitosis. How cohesin stably binds to chromosomes for extended periods, without impeding other chromosomal processes that also require access to the DNA, is poorly understood. Budding yeast cohesin is loaded onto DNA by the Scc2–Scc4 cohesin loader at centromeres and promoters of active genes, from where cohesin translocates to more permanent places of residence at transcription termination sites. Here we show that, at the GAL2 and MET17 loci, pre-existing cohesin is pushed downstream along the DNA in response to transcriptional gene activation, apparently without need for intermittent dissociation or reloading. We observe translocation intermediates and find that the distribution of most chromosomal cohesin is shaped by transcription. Our observations support a model in which cohesin is able to slide laterally along chromosomes while maintaining topological contact with DNA. In this way, stable cohesin binding to DNA and enduring sister chromatid cohesion become compatible with simultaneous underlying chromosomal activities, including but maybe not limited to transcription.

scholarly journals SUMOylation targets shugoshin to stabilize sister kinetochore biorientation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Bessie Su ◽  
Menglu Wang ◽  
Claudia Schaffner ◽  
Dean Clift ◽  
Olga O. Nerusheva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
Phosphatase 2A ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

AbstractThe accurate segregation of chromosomes during mitosis relies on the attachment of sister chromatids to microtubules from opposite poles, called biorientation. Sister chromatid cohesion resists microtubule forces, generating tension which provides the signal that biorientation has occurred. How tension silences the surveillance pathways that prevent cell cycle progression and correct erroneous kinetochore-microtubule remains unclear. Here we identify SUMOylation as a mechanism that promotes anaphase onset upon biorientation. SUMO ligases modify the tension-sensing pericentromere-localized chromatin protein, shugoshin, to stabilize bioriented sister kinetochore-microtubule attachments. In the absence of SUMOylation, Aurora B kinase removal from kinetochores is delayed. Shugoshin SUMOylation prevents its binding to protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and release of this interaction is important for stabilizing sister kinetochore biorientation. We propose that SUMOylation modulates the kinase-phosphatase balance within pericentromeres to inactivate the error correction machinery, thereby allowing anaphase entry in response to biorientation.

scholarly journals SUMOylation stabilizes sister kinetochore biorientation to allow timely anaphase

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Bessie Su ◽  
Menglu Wang ◽  
Claudia Schaffner ◽  
Olga O. Nerusheva ◽  
Dean Clift ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Sister Kinetochore ◽  
Phosphatase 2A ◽  
Chromosome Passenger Complex

During mitosis, sister chromatids attach to microtubules from opposite poles, called biorientation. Sister chromatid cohesion resists microtubule forces, generating tension, which provides the signal that biorientation has occurred. How tension silences the surveillance pathways that prevent cell cycle progression and correct erroneous kinetochore–microtubule attachments remains unclear. Here we show that SUMOylation dampens error correction to allow stable sister kinetochore biorientation and timely anaphase onset. The Siz1/Siz2 SUMO ligases modify the pericentromere-localized shugoshin (Sgo1) protein before its tension-dependent release from chromatin. Sgo1 SUMOylation reduces its binding to protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), and weakening of this interaction is important for stable biorientation. Unstable biorientation in SUMO-deficient cells is associated with persistence of the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) at centromeres, and SUMOylation of CPC subunit Bir1 also contributes to timely anaphase onset. We propose that SUMOylation acts in a combinatorial manner to facilitate dismantling of the error correction machinery within pericentromeres and thereby sharpen the metaphase–anaphase transition.

scholarly journals The TOR Signal Transduction Cascade Controls Cellular Differentiation in Response to Nutrients

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 4103-4113 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Shane Cutler ◽  
Xuewen Pan ◽  
Joseph Heitman ◽  
Maria E. Cardenas
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Protein Kinases ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Nutrient Sensing ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Tor Pathway ◽  
Pseudohyphal Growth ◽  
Pseudohyphal Differentiation

Rapamycin binds and inhibits the Tor protein kinases, which function in a nutrient-sensing signal transduction pathway that has been conserved from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeto humans. In yeast cells, the Tor pathway has been implicated in regulating cellular responses to nutrients, including proliferation, translation, transcription, autophagy, and ribosome biogenesis. We report here that rapamycin inhibits pseudohyphal filamentous differentiation of S. cerevisiae in response to nitrogen limitation. Overexpression of Tap42, a protein phosphatase regulatory subunit, restored pseudohyphal growth in cells exposed to rapamycin. The tap42-11 mutation compromised pseudohyphal differentiation and rendered it resistant to rapamycin. Cells lacking the Tap42-regulated protein phosphatase Sit4 exhibited a pseudohyphal growth defect and were markedly hypersensitive to rapamycin. Mutations in other Tap42-regulated phosphatases had no effect on pseudohyphal differentiation. Our findings support a model in which pseudohyphal differentiation is controlled by a nutrient-sensing pathway involving the Tor protein kinases and the Tap42–Sit4 protein phosphatase. Activation of the MAP kinase or cAMP pathways, or mutation of the Sok2 repressor, restored filamentation in rapamycin treated cells, supporting models in which the Tor pathway acts in parallel with these known pathways. Filamentous differentiation of diverse fungi was also blocked by rapamycin, demonstrating that the Tor signaling cascade plays a conserved role in regulating filamentous differentiation in response to nutrients.

scholarly journals Differential requirement for Bub1 and Bub3 in regulation of meiotic versus mitotic chromosome segregation

2020 ◽  
Vol 219 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisela Cairo ◽  
Anne M. MacKenzie ◽  
Soni Lacefield
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Protein Phosphatase 1 ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on the proper attachment of kinetochores to spindle microtubules before anaphase onset. The Ipl1/Aurora B kinase corrects improper attachments by phosphorylating kinetochore components and so releasing aberrant kinetochore–microtubule interactions. The localization of Ipl1 to kinetochores in budding yeast depends upon multiple pathways, including the Bub1–Bub3 pathway. We show here that in meiosis, Bub3 is crucial for correction of attachment errors. Depletion of Bub3 results in reduced levels of kinetochore-localized Ipl1 and concomitant massive chromosome missegregation caused by incorrect chromosome–spindle attachments. Depletion of Bub3 also results in shorter metaphase I and metaphase II due to premature localization of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) to kinetochores, which antagonizes Ipl1-mediated phosphorylation. We propose a new role for the Bub1–Bub3 pathway in maintaining the balance between kinetochore localization of Ipl1 and PP1, a balance that is essential for accurate meiotic chromosome segregation and timely anaphase onset.

scholarly journals Reduced Mad2 expression keeps relaxed kinetochores from arresting budding yeast in mitosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2448-2457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin L. Barnhart ◽  
Russell K. Dorer ◽  
Andrew W. Murray ◽  
Scott C. Schuyler
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Antimicrotubule Drugs

Chromosome segregation depends on the spindle checkpoint, which delays anaphase until all chromosomes have bound microtubules and have been placed under tension. The Mad1–Mad2 complex is an essential component of the checkpoint. We studied the consequences of removing one copy of MAD2 in diploid cells of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Compared to MAD2/MAD2 cells, MAD2/mad2Δ heterozygotes show increased chromosome loss and have different responses to two insults that activate the spindle checkpoint: MAD2/mad2Δ cells respond normally to antimicrotubule drugs but cannot respond to chromosomes that lack tension between sister chromatids. In MAD2/mad2Δ cells with normal sister chromatid cohesion, removing one copy of MAD1 restores the checkpoint and returns chromosome loss to wild-type levels. We conclude that cells need the normal Mad2:Mad1 ratio to respond to chromosomes that are not under tension.

scholarly journals Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1β and SMC3

2003 ◽  
Vol 160 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Eijpe ◽  
Hildo Offenberg ◽  
Rolf Jessberger ◽  
Ekaterina Revenkova ◽  
Christa Heyting
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Synaptonemal Complexes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Axial Element ◽  
Striking Contrast ◽  
Metaphase I

In meiotic prophase, the sister chromatids of each chromosome develop a common axial element (AE) that is integrated into the synaptonemal complex (SC). We analyzed the incorporation of sister chromatid cohesion proteins (cohesins) and other AE components into AEs. Meiotic cohesin REC8 appeared shortly before premeiotic S phase in the nucleus and formed AE-like structures (REC8-AEs) from premeiotic S phase on. Subsequently, meiotic cohesin SMC1β, cohesin SMC3, and AE proteins SCP2 and SCP3 formed dots along REC8-AEs, which extended and fused until they lined REC8-AEs along their length. In metaphase I, SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 disappeared from the chromosome arms and accumulated around the centromeres, where they stayed until anaphase II. In striking contrast, REC8 persisted along the chromosome arms until anaphase I and near the centromeres until anaphase II. We propose that REC8 provides a basis for AE formation and that the first steps in AE assembly do not require SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3. Furthermore, SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 cannot provide arm cohesion during metaphase I. We propose that REC8 then provides cohesion. RAD51 and/or DMC1 coimmunoprecipitates with REC8, suggesting that REC8 may also provide a basis for assembly of recombination complexes.

scholarly journals Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) promotes anaphase entry after DNA replication stress in budding yeast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory Haluska ◽  
Fengzhi Jin ◽  
Yanchang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Viability Loss ◽  
Phosphatase 2A ◽  
Dna Replication Stress

DNA replication stress activates the S-phase checkpoint that arrests the cell cycle, but it is poorly understood how cells recover from this arrest. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and Protein Phosphatase 2A (PP2A) are key cell cycle regulators, and Cdc55 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A in budding yeast. We found that yeast cells lacking functional PP2ACdc55 showed slow growth in the presence of hydroxyurea (HU), a DNA synthesis inhibitor, without obvious viability loss. Moreover, PP2A mutants exhibited delayed anaphase entry and sustained levels of anaphase inhibitor Pds1 after HU treatment. A DNA damage checkpoint Chk1 phosphorylates and stabilizes Pds1. We showed that chk1Δ and mutation of the Chk1 phosphorylation sites in Pds1 largely restored efficient anaphase entry in PP2A mutants after HU treatment. In addition, deletion of SWE1 that encodes the inhibitory kinase for CDK or mutation of the Swe1 phosphorylation site in CDK ( cdc28F19) also suppressed the anaphase entry delay in PP2A mutants after HU treatment. Our genetic data suggest that Swe1/CDK acts upstream of Pds1. Surprisingly, cdc55Δ showed significant suppression to the viability loss of S-phase checkpoint mutants during DNA synthesis block. Together, our results uncover a PP2A-Swe1-CDK-Chk1-Pds1 axis that promotes recovery from DNA replication stress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document