scholarly journals All three components of the neuronal SNARE complex contribute to secretory vesicle docking

2012 ◽  
Vol 198 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Wu ◽  
Yiwen Gu ◽  
Mary K. Morphew ◽  
Jun Yao ◽  
Felix L. Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Secretory Vesicle ◽  
Distal Portion ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Vesicle Docking ◽  
Large Dense Core Vesicles ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Snare Motif ◽  
Clostridial Neurotoxin

Before exocytosis, vesicles must first become docked to the plasma membrane. The SNARE complex was originally hypothesized to mediate both the docking and fusion steps in the secretory pathway, but previous electron microscopy (EM) studies indicated that the vesicular SNARE protein synaptobrevin (syb) was dispensable for docking. In this paper, we studied the function of syb in the docking of large dense-core vesicles (LDCVs) in live PC12 cells using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Cleavage of syb by a clostridial neurotoxin resulted in significant defects in vesicle docking in unfixed cells; these results were confirmed via EM using cells that were prepared using high-pressure freezing. The membrane-distal portion of its SNARE motif was critical for docking, whereas deletion of a membrane-proximal segment had little effect on docking but diminished fusion. Because docking was also inhibited by toxin-mediated cleavage of the target membrane SNAREs syntaxin and SNAP-25, syb might attach LDCVs to the plasma membrane through N-terminal assembly of trans-SNARE pairs.

Synaptotagmin-1: A Multi-Functional Protein that Mediates Vesicle Docking, Priming, and Fusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najeeb Ullah ◽  
Ezzouhra El Maaiden ◽  
Md. Sahab Uddin ◽  
Ghulam Md Ashraf
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Secretory Granules ◽  
Secretory Vesicle ◽  
Neuroendocrine Cells ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Secretory Vesicles ◽  
Functional Protein ◽  
Vesicle Docking ◽  
Synaptotagmin 1

: The fusion of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane depends on the assembly of v-SNAREs (VAMP2/synaptobrevin2) and t-SNAREs (SNAP25/syntaxin1) into the SNARE complex. Vesicles go through several upstream steps, referred to as docking and priming, to gain fusion competence. The vesicular protein synaptotagmin-1 (Syt-1) is the principal Ca2+ sensor for fusion in several central nervous system neurons and neuroendocrine cells and part of the docking complex for secretory granules. Syt-1 binds to the acceptor complex such as synaxin1, SNAP-25 on the plasma membrane to facilitate secretory vesicle docking, and upon Ca2+-influx promotes vesicle fusion. This review assesses the role of the Syt-1 protein involved in the secretory vesicle docking, priming, and fusion.

scholarly journals Promiscuity in Rab–SNARE Interactions

1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4149-4161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Grote ◽  
Peter J. Novick
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Free Form ◽  
Rab Proteins ◽  
Secretory Vesicles ◽  
Rab Protein ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Low Efficiency

Fusion of post-Golgi secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane in yeast requires the function of a Rab protein, Sec4p, and a set of v- and t-SNAREs, the Snc, Sso, and Sec9 proteins. We have tested the hypothesis that a selective interaction between Sec4p and the exocytic SNAREs is responsible for ensuring that secretory vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane but not with intracellular organelles. Assembly of Sncp and Ssop into a SNARE complex is defective in asec4-8 mutant strain. However, Snc2p binds in vivo to many other syntaxin-like t-SNAREs, and binding of Sncp to the endosomal/Golgi t-SNARE Tlg2p is also reduced in sec4-8cells. In addition, binding of Sncp to Ssop is reduced by mutations in two other Rab genes and four non-Rab genes that block the secretory pathway before the formation of secretory vesicles. In an alternate approach to look for selective Rab–SNARE interactions, we report that the nucleotide-free form of Sec4p coimmunoprecipitates with Ssop. However, Rab–SNARE binding is nonselective, because the nucleotide-free forms of six Rab proteins bind with similar low efficiency to three SNARE proteins, Ssop, Pep12p, and Sncp. We conclude that Rabs and SNAREs do not cooperate to specify the target membrane.

scholarly journals Sec1p Binds to SNARE Complexes and Concentrates at Sites of Secretion

1999 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chavela M. Carr ◽  
Eric Grote ◽  
Mary Munson ◽  
Frederick M. Hughson ◽  
Peter J. Novick
Keyword(s):  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
The Other ◽  
Complex Assembly ◽  
Vesicle Docking ◽  
Neuronal Protein ◽  
The Core ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Green Fluorescent ◽  
And Function

Proteins of the Sec1 family have been shown to interact with target-membrane t-SNAREs that are homologous to the neuronal protein syntaxin. We demonstrate that yeast Sec1p coprecipitates not only the syntaxin homologue Ssop, but also the other two exocytic SNAREs (Sec9p and Sncp) in amounts and in proportions characteristic of SNARE complexes in yeast lysates. The interaction between Sec1p and Ssop is limited by the abundance of SNARE complexes present in sec mutants that are defective in either SNARE complex assembly or disassembly. Furthermore, the localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Sec1p coincides with sites of vesicle docking and fusion where SNARE complexes are believed to assemble and function. The proposal that SNARE complexes act as receptors for Sec1p is supported by the mislocalization of GFP-Sec1p in a mutant defective for SNARE complex assembly and by the robust localization of GFP-Sec1p in a mutant that fails to disassemble SNARE complexes. The results presented here place yeast Sec1p at the core of the exocytic fusion machinery, bound to SNARE complexes and localized to sites of secretion.

Molecular mechanism of secretory vesicle docking

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi de Wit
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Secretory Vesicle ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Secretory Vesicles ◽  
Filamentous Actin ◽  
Embryonic Mouse ◽  
Vesicle Docking ◽  
Bovine Chromaffin Cell ◽  
Stable Association

Docking, the stable association of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, is considered to be the necessary first step before vesicles gain fusion-competence, but it is unclear how vesicles dock. In adrenal medullary chromaffin cells, access of secretory vesicles to docking sites is controlled by dense F-actin (filamentous actin) beneath the plasma membrane. Recently, we found that, in the absence of Munc18-1, the number of docked vesicles and the thickness of cortical F-actin are affected. In the present paper, I discuss the possible mechanism by which Munc18-1 modulates cortical F-actin and how it orchestrates the docking machinery via an interaction with syntaxin-1. Finally, a comparison of Munc18's role in embryonic mouse and adult bovine chromaffin cell model systems will be made to clarify observed differences in cortical F-actin as well as docking phenotypes.

scholarly journals Ordering the Final Events in Yeast Exocytosis

2000 ◽  
Vol 151 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Grote ◽  
Chavela M. Carr ◽  
Peter J. Novick
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Late Stage ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Secretory Vesicle ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Complex Assembly ◽  
Protein Receptor

In yeast, assembly of exocytic soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive fusion protein (NSF) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes between the secretory vesicle SNARE Sncp and the plasma membrane SNAREs Ssop and Sec9p occurs at a late stage of the exocytic reaction. Mutations that block either secretory vesicle delivery or tethering prevent SNARE complex assembly and the localization of Sec1p, a SNARE complex binding protein, to sites of secretion. By contrast, wild-type levels of SNARE complexes persist in the sec1-1 mutant after a secretory block is imposed, suggesting a role for Sec1p after SNARE complex assembly. In the sec18-1 mutant, cis-SNARE complexes containing surface-accessible Sncp accumulate in the plasma membrane. Thus, one function of Sec18p is to disassemble SNARE complexes on the postfusion membrane.

scholarly journals Dominant Negative Alleles ofSEC10Reveal Distinct Domains Involved in Secretion and Morphogenesis in Yeast

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1725-1739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dagmar Roth ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
Peter Novick
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Dominant Negative ◽  
Secretory Vesicles ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Vesicle Docking ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Exocyst Complex ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

The accurate targeting of secretory vesicles to distinct sites on the plasma membrane is necessary to achieve polarized growth and to establish specialized domains at the surface of eukaryotic cells. Members of a protein complex required for exocytosis, the exocyst, have been localized to regions of active secretion in the budding yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae where they may function to specify sites on the plasma membrane for vesicle docking and fusion. In this study we have addressed the function of one member of the exocyst complex, Sec10p. We have identified two functional domains of Sec10p that act in a dominant-negative manner to inhibit cell growth upon overexpression. Phenotypic and biochemical analysis of the dominant-negative mutants points to a bifunctional role for Sec10p. One domain, consisting of the amino-terminal two-thirds of Sec10p directly interacts with Sec15p, another exocyst component. Overexpression of this domain displaces the full-length Sec10 from the exocyst complex, resulting in a block in exocytosis and an accumulation of secretory vesicles. The carboxy-terminal domain of Sec10p does not interact with other members of the exocyst complex and expression of this domain does not cause a secretory defect. Rather, this mutant results in the formation of elongated cells, suggesting that the second domain of Sec10p is required for morphogenesis, perhaps regulating the reorientation of the secretory pathway from the tip of the emerging daughter cell toward the mother–daughter connection during cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals All three components of the neuronal SNARE complex contribute to secretory vesicle docking

2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. i2-i2
Author(s):  
Yao Wu ◽  
Yiwen Gu ◽  
Mary K. Morphew ◽  
Jun Yao ◽  
Felix L. Yeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Secretory Vesicle ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Vesicle Docking ◽  
Three Components

scholarly journals Formation and Turnover of NSF- and SNAP-containing “Fusion” Complexes Occur on Undocked, Clathrin-coated Vesicle–derived Membranes

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1633-1647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileithyia Swanton ◽  
John Sheehan ◽  
Naomi Bishop ◽  
Stephen High ◽  
Philip Woodman
Keyword(s):  
Vesicular Transport ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Coated Vesicle ◽  
Transport Pathways ◽  
Vesicle Docking ◽  
Transport Vesicles ◽  
Transport Vesicle ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Vesicle Cycle

Specificity of vesicular transport is determined by pair-wise interaction between receptors (SNAP receptors or SNAREs) associated with a transport vesicle and its target membrane. Two additional factors, N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) and soluble NSF attachment protein (SNAP) are ubiquitous components of vesicular transport pathways. However, the precise role they play is not known. On the basis that NSF and SNAP can be recruited to preformed SNARE complexes, it has been proposed that NSF- and SNAP-containing complexes are formed after SNARE-dependent docking of transport vesicles. This would enable ATPase-dependent complex disassembly to be coupled directly to membrane fusion. Alternatively, binding and release of NSF/SNAP may occur before vesicle docking, and perhaps be involved in the activation of SNAREs. To gain more information about the point at which so-called 20S complexes form during the transport vesicle cycle, we have examined NSF/SNAP/SNARE complex turnover on clathrin-coated vesicle–derived membranes in situ. This has been achieved under conditions in which the extent of membrane docking can be precisely monitored. We demonstrate by UV-dependent cross-linking experiments, coupled to laser light-scattering analysis of membranes, that complexes containing NSF, SNAP, and SNAREs will form and dissociate on the surface of undocked transport vesicles.

scholarly journals Regulation of exocytosis by the exocyst subunit Sec6 and the SM protein Sec1

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Morgera ◽  
Margaret R. Sallah ◽  
Michelle L. Dubuke ◽  
Pallavi Gandhi ◽  
Daniel N. Brewer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Secretory Vesicle ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Snare Complex Formation

Trafficking of protein and lipid cargo through the secretory pathway in eukaryotic cells is mediated by membrane-bound vesicles. Secretory vesicle targeting and fusion require a conserved multisubunit protein complex termed the exocyst, which has been implicated in specific tethering of vesicles to sites of polarized exocytosis. The exocyst is directly involved in regulating soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes and membrane fusion through interactions between the Sec6 subunit and the plasma membrane SNARE protein Sec9. Here we show another facet of Sec6 function—it directly binds Sec1, another SNARE regulator, but of the Sec1/Munc18 family. The Sec6–Sec1 interaction is exclusive of Sec6–Sec9 but compatible with Sec6–exocyst assembly. In contrast, the Sec6–exocyst interaction is incompatible with Sec6–Sec9. Therefore, upon vesicle arrival, Sec6 is proposed to release Sec9 in favor of Sec6–exocyst assembly and to simultaneously recruit Sec1 to sites of secretion for coordinated SNARE complex formation and membrane fusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document