scholarly journals The same human alloreactive T cell clone can help both B lymphocytes and specific cytotoxic precursors.

1984 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Ramarli ◽  
B Parodi ◽  
M Fabbi ◽  
G Corte ◽  
A Lanzavecchia

Human alloreactive proliferating T cell clones have been compared for their capacity to provide help for B cell activation and the generation of a specific cytotoxic response. The results demonstrate that, when triggered by the relevant alloantigen, the same T cell clone can induce a strong polyclonal B cell activation and serve as the only source of helper cells for the generation of a specific cytotoxic response by any source of CTL precursors against any stimulator cell present in culture.

1984 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 906-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Reinisch ◽  
A P Sing ◽  
E R Bacon ◽  
R B Corley ◽  
R K Gershon

A series of Thy-1.2+ Ly-1+ Qa-1+ malignant T cell clones have been isolated from murine sarcoma virus-murine leukemia-Moloney (MSV-MuLV-M)-induced B cell lymphomas or from MSV-MuLV-M-infected B6 mice. These T cell clones enhance both antigen-independent and -dependent lymphocyte differentiation and function. They also induce the differentiation of granulocytes and erythrocytes in the stem cell compartment, a function that parallels the immunopathology of the disease in vivo. The malignant T cell appears to sustain B lymphoma growth in vivo by releasing a factor (BCGF) that promotes B cell proliferation.


1987 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Juy ◽  
G. Sterkers ◽  
A. Gomez ◽  
D. Zelizewski ◽  
J.-P. Lévy

1990 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 833-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Svetlana M. Mazel ◽  
Alexander Y. Rudensky ◽  
Vitalij L. Yurin

1986 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 713-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Y Leung ◽  
M C Young ◽  
N Wood ◽  
R S Geha

Two human alloreactive T cell clones were established from a one-way mixed lymphocyte culture involving two nonatopic donors, and were assessed for their capacity to induce IgE synthesis by B cells obtained from the original stimulator. The two alloreactive T cell clones studied induced IgG but not IgE synthesis in normal B cells. However, one of the two clones, clone 2H6, induced IgE synthesis in the presence of supernatants from T cell lines derived from patients with the hyper-IgE syndrome (HIE), and enriched for T cells bearing receptors for IgE. These supernatants by themselves caused no IgE synthesis in nonatopic B cells. The potentiating factors in these supernatants were shown to bind to IgE. Time sequence experiments indicated that interaction of the B cells with the alloreactive clone 2H6 renders them responsive to the action of the IgE-potentiating factors. These results indicate that induction of IgE synthesis in normal B cells involves at least two sequential T cell derived signals. Furthermore, T cell clones are heterogenous in their capacity to provide these signals.


1982 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1100-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Infante ◽  
P D Infante ◽  
S Gillis ◽  
C G Fathman

Alloreactive T cell clones with distinct specificities were used to raise anti-idiotypic antisera via an F1 anti-(parent anti-F1) protocol. Antisera were raised that could stimulate the proliferation of the appropriate T cell clone, but not other clones. The active fraction of the antisera for T cell proliferation was immunoglobulin. In addition to proliferation, an anti-idiotypic antiserum could induce the appropriate T cell clone to secrete substantial amounts of interleukin 2 (IL-2). Production of IL-2 appeared independent of the involvement of accessory cells. These accessory cells may be unnecessary for IL-2 production in our assay, or their effect may be produced by anti-idiotype. Thus, anti-idiotype may provide two or more specific T cell signals.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3832-3832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenz Jahn ◽  
Pleun Hombrink ◽  
Michel G.D. Kester ◽  
Dirk M. van der Steen ◽  
Renate S. Hagedoorn ◽  
...  

Abstract Therapeutic reactivity of CD20-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) or CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-transduced T cells is exerted by targeting extracellular antigens. However, loss of CD20 and CD19 expression or absence of these molecules on other malignancies such as multiple myeloma restricts their application. Here, we identified the intracellular transcription factor Bob1 encoded by gene POU2AF1 as a suitable target for immunotherapy. Bob1 is highly expressed in CD19+ B cells, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and multiple myeloma (MM) and is absent in the non-B lineages including CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), T cells, fibroblasts, keratinocytes and gastrointestinal tract. Bob1 is localized intracellularly but HLA-presented Bob1-derived peptides are accessible on the cell surface to T cell receptors (TCRs) and can thus be recognized by T cells. From the HLA-presented ligandome (Mol Cell Proteomics, 2013;12:1829) we identified naturally processed Bob1-derived peptides displayed in HLA-A*0201 (HLA-A2) and in HLA-B*0702 (HLA-B7). Since auto-reactivity towards self-antigens such as Bob1 is prevented by depleting high-avidity T cells recognizing self-antigens in self-HLA, we exploited the immunogenicity of these peptides presented in allogeneic HLA. From a total of 3 x 109 peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 6 different HLA-A2/B7-negative healthy donors, we isolated and clonally expanded more than 1000 CD8+ T cells binding to peptide-MHC-tetramers composed of the Bob1-derived peptides bound to HLA-A2 or HLA-B7. The T cell clones were tested for stringent peptide-specificity by stimulation with Bob1-negative K562 cells expressing either HLA-A2 or B7 unloaded or pulsed with Bob1-derived peptides. This resulted in the selection of 15 T cell clones highly specific for Bob1. To identify the T cell clones of highest avidity, T cell clones were compared for peptide-sensitivity by testing the recognition of stimulator cells loaded with titrated amounts of Bob1-derived peptides and of Bob1-expressing HLA-A2/B7-positive EBV-transformed B cells. T cell clone 4G11 was selected because of high sensitivity and specificity for Bob1-derived peptide Bob144 presented in HLA-B7 and T cell clone 3C10 specifically recognized peptide Bob1245 bound to HLA-A2. Bob1-dependent recognition was demonstrated by transduction of Bob1 into cell lines that otherwise lack Bob1 expression. To investigate whether harmful toxicities could be caused by these T cell clones, we tested their reactivity against a wide panel of Bob1-negative stimulator cells demonstrating absence of recognition of HLA-B7-positive CD34+ HPCs, T cells, monocytes, immature and mature dendritic cells, and fibroblasts even under simulated inflamed conditions. Stringent HLA-B7-restricted recognition was observed for clone 4G11 when tested against a stimulator panel expressing a wide range of common and rare HLA class I and II molecules. These data illustrate a safe reactivity profile with little chance of off-target toxicity. To test their clinical applicability, clone 4G11 and 3C10 were tested for recognition of various primary B cell malignancies. Clone 4G11 efficiently recognized HLA-B7-positive primary ALL, CLL and mantle cell lymphoma while clone 3C10 recognized HLA-A2-positive primary B cell malignancies albeit to a lesser degree. Furthermore, reproducible strong recognition of purified primary HLA-B7-positive multiple myeloma could be demonstrated for clone 4G11. Therefore, T cell clone 4G11’s TCR may be used for immunotherapy by administering TCR-transduced T cells to multiple myeloma patients. To test whether introduction of 4G11’s TCR confers Bob1-reactivity onto recipient cells, the TCR was cloned into a retroviral vector. Highly specific reactivity against HLA-B7-positive Bob1-expressing target cells could be installed to TCR-transduced recipient T cells. In summary, we identified the intracellular transcription factor Bob1 encoded by gene POU2AF1 as a suitable target for TCR-based immunotherapies of B cell malignancies and multiple myeloma. Bob1-specific T cell clone 4G11 efficiently recognized primary B cell leukemia and multiple myeloma. TCR gene transfer approaches using Bob1-specific TCRs can bring novel treatment modalities for patients with B cell malignancies or multiple myeloma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1985 ◽  
Vol 162 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
D T Umetsu ◽  
D Y Leung ◽  
R Siraganian ◽  
H H Jabara ◽  
R S Geha

Human T cell helper/inducer clones were used to induce IgE synthesis in B cells from both allergic and nonallergic donors. An alloreactive T cell clone, activated by recognition of specific HLA-DR antigens, stimulated peripheral blood B cells from both allergic and nonallergic donors to synthesize IgE antibody. B cells of allergic donors differed from those of nonallergic donors in their requirements for induction of IgE synthesis. Induction of IgE synthesis in B cells from nonallergic individuals occurred only under conditions of cognate interaction, in which the B cells expressed the alloantigen recognized by the T cells. In contrast, IgE synthesis in B cells from allergic donors occurred under conditions of cognate interaction with T cells as well as bystander conditions where the B cells did not express the alloantigen recognized by the T cell clones and where the T cell clones were stimulated by third-party monocytes bearing the relevant alloantigens. Furthermore, bystander stimulation of IgE synthesis in allergic donors occurred in the presence of tetanus toxoid (TT) antigen-specific T cell clones activated by the appropriate TT-pulsed monocytes. In contrast to the differing requirements of B cells from normal vs. allergic subjects for the induction of IgE synthesis, these B cells did not differ in their requirements for the induction of IgG synthesis. IgG synthesis was induced in all B cells under conditions of cognate interaction with the T cells as well as under conditions of bystander stimulation. These results suggest that cognate T-B cell interactions may be important in the development of IgE immune responses in the normal host.


1985 ◽  
Vol 161 (4) ◽  
pp. 785-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Friedman ◽  
D Sillcocks ◽  
A Rao ◽  
S Faas ◽  
H Cantor

We find that a fraction of Ly-1+2- inducer T cell clones inhibits differentiation of memory B cells into IgG-secreting plaque-forming cells. Inhibition of secondary antibody responses was not the result of induction of Ly-2+ T suppressors. Instead, inducer cells directly inactivated B cells, requiring an antigen bridge as well as identity at the major histocompatibility complex (I-A) locus. The interaction between the inducer T cell clone and hapten-specific B memory cells results in an early proliferative response and subsequent failure of B cells to secrete antibody in response to T helper cell signals. Possible mechanisms for this novel type of B cell inactivation are explored.


1982 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1086-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Heber-Katz ◽  
RH Schwartz ◽  
LA Matis ◽  
C Hannum ◽  
T Fairwell ◽  
...  

Previous studies from our laboratory showed that B 10.A mice are high responders to pigeon cytochrome c fragment 81-104, whereas B 10.A(5R) mice are low responders. In the present studies, the C-terminal cyanogen bromide cleavage fragment and homologous synthetic peptides of tobacco horn worm moth cytochrome c were shown to be immunogenic in both B10.A and B10.A(5R) mice. These strains, however, showed different patterns of cross-reactivity when immune lymph node T cells were stimulated with cytochrome c fragments from other species. To examine the two patterns of responsiveness at a clonal level, cytochrome c fragment-specific T cell hybridomas were made and found to secrete interleukin 2 in response to antigen. The patterns of cross- reactivity of these B 10.A and B 10.A(5R) clones were similar to that seen in the whole lymph node population. Surprisingly, when these clones were tested for major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted antigen recognition, they were all found to respond to antigen with both B10.A and B10.A(5R) antigen-presenting cells (APC). Furthermore, the cross-reactivity pattern appeared to be largely determined by the genotype of the APC, not the genotype of the T cell clone. That is, a given T cell clone displayed a different fine specificity when assayed with B10.A or B10.A(5R) APC. This observation indicates that the APC MHC gene product and antigen interact during the stimulation of the T cell response and that as a consequence the specificity of antigen-induced T cell activation is influenced by these MHC gene products. (During the preparation of this manuscript it has come to our attention that results similar to our own, concerning the fine specificity of cytotoxic T cell clones, have been obtained by Dr. T. R. Hunig and Dr. M. J. Bevan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA. T. R. Hunig and M. J. Bevan. 1981. Specificity of T-cell clones illustrates altered self hypothesis. Nature. 294:460.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document