scholarly journals Receptor editing: How B cells stay tolerant

2007 ◽  
Vol 204 (8) ◽  
pp. 1735-1735
Author(s):  
Hema Bashyam
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Main Mechanism ◽  
Receptor Editing ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells

In 1993, David Nemazee and Martin Weigert independently showed that autoreactive B cells could proofread, alter, and reexpress modified receptors to become nonautoreactive. This process, called “receptor editing,” has since gained prominence as the main mechanism of B cell tolerance.

scholarly journals Central human B cell tolerance manifests with a distinctive cell phenotype and is enforced via CXCR4 signaling in hu-mice

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (16) ◽  
pp. e2021570118
Author(s):  
Thiago Alves da Costa ◽  
Jacob N. Peterson ◽  
Julie Lang ◽  
Jeremy Shulman ◽  
Xiayuan Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Immune System ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
Human Immune System ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells ◽  
Cell Clones ◽  
Human Immune

Central B cell tolerance, the process restricting the development of many newly generated autoreactive B cells, has been intensely investigated in mouse cells while studies in humans have been hampered by the inability to phenotypically distinguish autoreactive and nonautoreactive immature B cell clones and the difficulty in accessing fresh human bone marrow samples. Using a human immune system mouse model in which all human Igκ+ B cells undergo central tolerance, we discovered that human autoreactive immature B cells exhibit a distinctive phenotype that includes lower activation of ERK and differential expression of CD69, CD81, CXCR4, and other glycoproteins. Human B cells exhibiting these characteristics were observed in fresh human bone marrow tissue biopsy specimens, although differences in marker expression were smaller than in the humanized mouse model. Furthermore, the expression of these markers was slightly altered in autoreactive B cells of humanized mice engrafted with some human immune systems genetically predisposed to autoimmunity. Finally, by treating mice and human immune system mice with a pharmacologic antagonist, we show that signaling by CXCR4 is necessary to prevent both human and mouse autoreactive B cell clones from egressing the bone marrow, indicating that CXCR4 functionally contributes to central B cell tolerance.

scholarly journals Active PI3K abrogates central tolerance in high-avidity autoreactive B cells

2019 ◽  
Vol 216 (5) ◽  
pp. 1135-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Greaves ◽  
Jacob N. Peterson ◽  
Pamela Strauch ◽  
Raul M. Torres ◽  
Roberta Pelanda
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Peripheral Tolerance ◽  
High Avidity ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Central Tolerance ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells ◽  
Self Antigen

Autoreactive B cells that bind self-antigen with high avidity in the bone marrow undergo mechanisms of central tolerance that prevent their entry into the peripheral B cell population. These mechanisms are breached in many autoimmune patients, increasing their risk of B cell–mediated autoimmune diseases. Resolving the molecular pathways that can break central B cell tolerance could therefore provide avenues to diminish autoimmunity. Here, we show that B cell–intrinsic expression of a constitutively active form of PI3K-P110α by high-avidity autoreactive B cells of mice completely abrogates central B cell tolerance and further promotes these cells to escape from the bone marrow, differentiate in peripheral tissue, and undergo activation in response to self-antigen. Upon stimulation with T cell help factors, these B cells secrete antibodies in vitro but remain unable to secrete autoantibodies in vivo. Overall, our data demonstrate that activation of the PI3K pathway leads high-avidity autoreactive B cells to breach central, but not late, stages of peripheral tolerance.

scholarly journals Reduced receptor editing in lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice

2007 ◽  
Vol 204 (12) ◽  
pp. 2853-2864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Lamoureux ◽  
Lisa C. Watson ◽  
Marie Cherrier ◽  
Patrick Skog ◽  
David Nemazee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Immunoglobulin M ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Receptor Editing ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Immature B Cells

The initial B cell repertoire contains a considerable proportion of autoreactive specificities. The first major B cell tolerance checkpoint is at the stage of the immature B cell, where receptor editing is the primary mode of eliminating self-reactivity. The cells that emigrate from the bone marrow have a second tolerance checkpoint in the transitional compartment in the spleen. Although it is known that the second checkpoint is defective in lupus, it is not clear whether there is any breakdown in central B cell tolerance in the bone marrow. We demonstrate that receptor editing is less efficient in the lupus-prone strain MRL/lpr. In an in vitro system, when receptor-editing signals are given to bone marrow immature B cells by antiidiotype antibody or after in vivo exposure to membrane-bound self-antigen, MRL/lpr 3-83 transgenic immature B cells undergo less endogenous rearrangement and up-regulate recombination activating gene messenger RNA to a lesser extent than B10 transgenic cells. CD19, along with immunoglobulin M, is down-regulated in the bone marrow upon receptor editing, but the extent of down-regulation is fivefold less in MRL/lpr mice. Less efficient receptor editing could allow some autoreactive cells to escape from the bone marrow in lupus-prone mice, thus predisposing to autoimmunity.

scholarly journals Impaired early B cell tolerance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

2005 ◽  
Vol 201 (10) ◽  
pp. 1659-1667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Samuels ◽  
Yen-Shing Ng ◽  
Claire Coupillaud ◽  
Daniel Paget ◽  
Eric Meffre
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Autoantibody Production ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Polyreactive Antibodies

Autoantibody production is a characteristic of most autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The role of these autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of RA remains elusive, but they appear in the serum many years before the onset of clinical disease suggesting an early break in B cell tolerance. The stage of B cell development at which B cell tolerance is broken in RA remains unknown. We previously established in healthy donors that most polyreactive developing B cells are silenced in the bone marrow, and additional autoreactive B cells are removed in the periphery. B cell tolerance in untreated active RA patients was analyzed by testing the specificity of recombinant antibodies cloned from single B cells. We find that autoreactive B cells fail to be removed in all six RA patients and represent 35–52% of the mature naive B cell compartment compared with 20% in healthy donors. In some patients, RA B cells express an increased proportion of polyreactive antibodies that can recognize immunoglobulins and cyclic citrullinated peptides, suggesting early defects in central B cell tolerance. Thus, RA patients exhibit defective B cell tolerance checkpoints that may favor the development of autoimmunity.

Receptor editing is the main mechanism of B cell tolerance toward membrane antigens

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Halverson ◽  
Raul M Torres ◽  
Roberta Pelanda
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Main Mechanism ◽  
Receptor Editing ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Membrane Antigens

scholarly journals B cell tolerance and antibody production to the celiac disease autoantigen transglutaminase 2

2019 ◽  
Vol 217 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fleur du Pré ◽  
Jana Blazevski ◽  
Alisa E. Dewan ◽  
Jorunn Stamnaes ◽  
Chakravarthi Kanduri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Celiac Disease ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Transglutaminase 2 ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells ◽  
T Cell Help

Autoantibodies to transglutaminase 2 (TG2) are hallmarks of celiac disease. To address B cell tolerance and autoantibody formation to TG2, we generated immunoglobulin knock-in (Ig KI) mice that express a prototypical celiac patient–derived anti-TG2 B cell receptor equally reactive to human and mouse TG2. We studied B cell development in the presence/absence of autoantigen by crossing the Ig KI mice to Tgm2−/− mice. Autoreactive B cells in Tgm2+/+ mice were indistinguishable from their naive counterparts in Tgm2−/− mice with no signs of clonal deletion, receptor editing, or B cell anergy. The autoreactive B cells appeared ignorant to their antigen, and they produced autoantibodies when provided T cell help. The findings lend credence to a model of celiac disease where gluten-reactive T cells provide help to autoreactive TG2-specific B cells by involvement of gluten–TG2 complexes, and they outline a general mechanism of autoimmunity with autoantibodies being produced by ignorant B cells on provision of T cell help.

Mechanisms of B Cell Tolerance after in Utero Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4289-4289
Author(s):  
Lauren Elizabeth McClain ◽  
Grace Lee ◽  
Aimee G Kim ◽  
Patricia Tsao ◽  
Eline Luning Prak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Donor Cell ◽  
Absolute Number ◽  
Receptor Editing ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
Functional Inactivation

Abstract Background: In utero hematopoietic cell transplantation (IUHCT) is a nonmyeloablative, nonimmunosuppressive transplant approach that results in donor cell engraftment across immune barriers. Although a significant amount of work has investigated the fate of T cells following IUHCT, little attention has been paid to B cell tolerance and the fate of donor derived host reactive or host derived donor reactive B cells following IUHCT. B cell tolerance is broadly believed to occur by a combination of 3 mechanisms: deletion, receptor editing, and functional inactivation (anergy). In the current study we attempt to elucidate the mechanism(s) by which B cell tolerance occurs following IUHCT. Methods: 10x106 donor bone marrow (BM) cells were injected intravenously via the vitelline vein into gestational day 14 murine fetuses. IUHCT was performed in the congenic (C57Bl/6-GFP [H2Kb ] into C57Bl/6 [H2Kb ]) and allogeneic (C57Bl/6-GFP into Balb/c [H2Kd ]) strain combinations. Naive Balb/c and C57Bl/6 mice served as controls. Mice were sacrificed at day of life 3 (P3), 1 month and 4 months of age at which time their BM, spleen, and serum were harvested. To assess B cell deletion, flow cytometry was used to determine the absolute # and % of host and donor immature and pre B cells in the BM. Additionally, apoptosis of host and donor BM derived B cells was determined by annexin staining. Central receptor editing was evaluated using RT qPCR to measure the amount of Vκ-RS rearrangments in BM pre-B cells. Peripheral receptor editing was studied by calculating the % of λ light chains in mature splenocytes identified by flow cytometry. Finally, functional inactivation of donor reactive host B cells was assessed by measuring anti-H2Kb serum antibodies (ab) of allogeneic chimeras, naive, and immunized mice at 1 month of age. Results: The absolute number of BM immature B cells was decreased in allogeneic recipients of IUHCT compared to noninjected Balb/c controls at 1 month of age (fig 1). This effect was lost by 4 months of age. The decrease in B cells resulted primarily from a decrease in immature donor as opposed to host B cells compared to controls (% immature donor B cells in allogeneic recipients vs. controls: 16.2% vs. 39.9%; p<0.0005). Donor B cells in allogeneic chimeras also demonstrated a trend toward increased apoptosis compared to controls (24.8 vs. 18.7%; p=0.2) which was not seen in immature host B cells (18.3 vs. 18.6%; p=0.9). There was no significant decrease in the absolute number of immature B cells or increased apoptosis in congenic recipients compared to uninjected controls. These findings suggest deletion of autoreactivedonor B cells. Light chain receptor editing involves rearrangements within the κ and λ gene loci and may occur in BM pre-B cells or mature B cells in the spleen. We found no difference in the Vκ-RS rearrangements of pre B cells in allogeneic chimeras and controls at 1 month. In contrast, the quantity of total λ+ mature splenic B cells was increased in allogeneic chimeras at P3 (10.8 vs. 8.4%; p=0.02) and resulted from an increased host λ+ % compared to controls (10.8 vs. 8.4% p=0.03) suggesting peripheral receptor editing of host cells (fig.2). The λ+ % increase in allogeneic chimeras was lost by 1 month. Autoreactive B cells that escape deletion and receptor editing can be functionally inactivated. Neither allogeneic nor naive mice developed ab to H2Kb splenocytes, however, Balb/c mice immunized to H2kb antigen showed high ablevels (MFI fold change: allo-0.89 naive-1.37 imm-2.77; p<0.05). Conclusion: B cell tolerance after IUHCT is achieved by distinct mechanisms for host and donor cell populations. Donor derived host reactive B cells undergo deletion and apoptosis while receptor editing and functional inactivation are the primary mechanisms of B cell tolerance of host derived donor reactive B cells. We hope use this and future studies of antigen specific B cell tolerance to harness the immunologic potential of IUHCT for many hematopoietic and immunologic congenital diseases. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Liver-expressed Igκ superantigen induces tolerance of polyclonal B cells by clonal deletion not κ to λ receptor editing

2011 ◽  
Vol 208 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Ota ◽  
Miyo Ota ◽  
Bao Hoa Duong ◽  
Amanda L. Gavin ◽  
David Nemazee
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Mature Stage ◽  
Receptor Editing ◽  
Cell Tolerance ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Clonal Deletion

Little is know about the nature of peripheral B cell tolerance or how it may vary in distinct lineages. Although autoantibody transgenic studies indicate that anergy and apoptosis are involved, some studies claim that receptor editing occurs. To model peripheral B cell tolerance in a normal, polyclonal immune system, we generated transgenic mice expressing an Igκ–light chain–reactive superantigen targeted to the plasma membrane of hepatocytes (pAlb mice). In contrast to mice expressing κ superantigen ubiquitously, in which κ cells edit efficiently to λ, in pAlb mice, κ B cells underwent clonal deletion. Their κ cells failed to populate lymph nodes, and the remaining splenic κ cells were anergic, arrested at a semi-mature stage without undergoing receptor editing. In the liver, κ cells recognized superantigen, down-regulated surface Ig, and expressed active caspase 3, suggesting ongoing apoptosis at the site of B cell receptor ligand expression. Some, apparently mature, κ B1 and follicular B cells persisted in the peritoneum. BAFF (B cell–activating factor belonging to the tumor necrosis factor family) overexpression rescued splenic κ B cell maturation and allowed κ cells to populate lymph nodes. Our model facilitates analysis of tissue-specific autoimmunity, tolerance, and apoptosis in a polyclonal B cell population. The results suggest that deletion, not editing, is the major irreversible pathway of tolerance induction among peripheral B cells.

scholarly journals Light chain editing in kappa-deficient animals: a potential mechanism of B cell tolerance.

1994 ◽  
Vol 180 (5) ◽  
pp. 1805-1815 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Prak ◽  
M Trounstine ◽  
D Huszar ◽  
M Weigert
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Heavy Chain ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Allelic Exclusion ◽  
Receptor Editing ◽  
B Cell Tolerance ◽  
Clonal Deletion ◽  
Autoreactive B Cells ◽  
Surface Receptors

The genetic organization of the kappa and lambda light chain loci permits multiple, successive rearrangement attempts at each allele. Multiple rearrangements allow autoreactive B cells to escape clonal deletion by editing their surface receptors. Editing may also facilitate efficient B cell production by salvaging cells with nonproductive light chain (L chain) rearrangements. To study receptor editing of kappa L chains, we have characterized B cells from mice hemizygous for the targeted inactivation of kappa (JCkD/wt) which have an anti-DNA heavy chain transgene, 3H9. Hybridomas from JCkD/wt mice exhibited an increased frequency of rearrangements to downstream Jk segments (such as Jk5) compared with most surveys from normal mice, consistent with receptor editing by sequential kappa locus rearrangements in JCkD/wt. We observed an even higher frequency of rearrangements to Jk5 in 3H9 JCkD/wt animals compared with nontransgenic JCkD/wt, consistent with editing of autoreactive kappa in 3H9 JCkD/wt. We also recovered a large number of 3H9 JCkD/wt lines with Vk12/13-Jk5 rearrangements and could demonstrate by PCR and Southern analysis that up to three quarters of these lines underwent multiple kappa rearrangements. To investigate editing at the lambda locus, we used homozygous kappa-deficient animals (JCkD/JCkD and 3H9 JCkD/JCkD). The frequencies of V lambda 1 and V lambda 2 rearrangements among splenic hybridomas in 3H9 JCkD/JCkD were reduced by 75% whereas V lambda X was increased 5-10-fold, compared with nontransgenic JCkD/JCkD animals. This indicates that V lambda 1 and V lambda 2 are negatively regulated in 3H9 JCkD/JCkD, consistent with earlier studies that showed that the 3H9 heavy chain, in combination with lambda 1 binds DNA. As successive lambda rearrangements to V lambda X do not inactivate V lambda 1, the consequence of lambda editing in 3H9 JCkD/JCkD would be failed allelic exclusion at lambda. However, analysis of 18 3H9 JCkD/JCkD hybridomas with V lambda 1 and V lambda X DNA rearrangements revealed that most of these lines do not have productive lambda 1 rearrangements. In sum, both kappa and lambda loci undergo editing to recover from nonproductive rearrangement, but only kappa locus editing appears to play a substantial role in rescuing autoreactive B cells from deletion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document