scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Al-Qurun Teaching Model (ATM) Viewed from Gender Differences: The Impact on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability

2020 ◽  
Vol 1467 ◽  
pp. 012001
Author(s):  
Syamsul Huda ◽  
Suherman ◽  
Komarudin ◽  
Muhamad Syazali ◽  
Rofiqul Umam
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Syahfitri Purnama ◽  
Muawanah Muawanah ◽  
Tista Maya Surati ◽  
Rika Septianingsih

A learning can run well supported by an appropriate learning model. In this study the Search Solve Create Share (SSCS) and Think Pair Share (TPS) learning models are used. This research is a quantitative study using t test. The purpose of this study is to study whether there are differences between the SSCS learning model and the TPS learning model on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This research is a quantitative study with a research design. Random Design Group Pretest-Posttest Group. The results of this study obtained a P-value smaller than the significance level. Hypothesis testing from this study provides conclusions about the TPS learning model better than the SSCS learning model in improving students' mathematical problem solving abilities.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 475-488
Author(s):  
Zulkarnain Zulkarnain ◽  
◽  
Hutkemri Zulnaidi ◽  
Susda Heleni ◽  
Muhammad Syafri ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Munifah Munifah ◽  
Windi Septiyani ◽  
Indah Tri Rahayu ◽  
Rahmi Ramadhani ◽  
Hasan Said Tortop

Objectives The ability to solve problems is to gain knowledge and motivation in the problem solving process of students. The researcher used the IMPROVE and OSBORN learning models to improve problem solving skills. The IMPROVE and OSBORN learning models emphasize the development of optimal mathematical skills and generate new ideas in the process of problem solving. This research is used to see the impact of the IMPROVE learning model and OSBORN learning model which is better in mathematical problem solving abilities. This research uses the Quasy Experimental Design method. Hypothesis testing uses an independent sample test. The conclusion of the study is the mathematical problem solving ability of students who use the IMPROVE learning model is better than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who use the OSBORN learning model.


2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (13) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Meirav Tzohar-Rozen ◽  
Bracha Kramarski

Mathematical problem solving is one of the most valuable aspects of mathematics education and the most difficult for elementary school students. Cognitive and metacognitive difficulties in this area cause students to develop negative attitudes and emotions as affective reactions, hampering their efforts and achievements. These metacognitive and meta-affective reactions are fundamental aspects of self-regulated learning (SRL), a non-innate process that requires systematic, explicit student training. This study investigated the impact of two self-regulation programs among young students (Grade 5)—metacognition (n = 64) and meta-affect (n = 54) versus a control group (n =53)—on enhancing achievements in mathematical verbal problem solving and a novel transfer task, as well as metacognitive and meta-affective regulation processes of a focus group during a thinking-aloud solution. Mixed methods indicate that students who participated in the metacognitive and meta-affective intervention programs presented similar but higher achievements than the control group. Additionally, during the thinking-aloud solution, students from each group broadly implemented the self-regulation processes they were trained in, while consistently referring to all the self-regulation phases. The current study makes an important contribution to practical implications for students with diverse abilities.


2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 1619-1630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marci S. DeCaro ◽  
Kristin E. Rotar ◽  
Matthew S. Kendra ◽  
Sian L. Beilock

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document