Mathematical Problem Solving Capabilities: The Impact of Search Solve Create Share and Think Pair Share learning models on Logarithmic Lesson

Syahfitri Purnama; Muawanah Muawanah; Tista Maya Surati; Rika Septianingsih

doi:10.24042/ajpm.v11i1.6740

Mathematical Problem Solving Capabilities: The Impact of Search Solve Create Share and Think Pair Share learning models on Logarithmic Lesson

Al-Jabar Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.24042/ajpm.v11i1.6740 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 159-166

Author(s):

Syahfitri Purnama ◽

Muawanah Muawanah ◽

Tista Maya Surati ◽

Rika Septianingsih

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Quantitative Study ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

P Value ◽

Learning Models ◽

Significance Level ◽

The Impact ◽

Better Than

A learning can run well supported by an appropriate learning model. In this study the Search Solve Create Share (SSCS) and Think Pair Share (TPS) learning models are used. This research is a quantitative study using t test. The purpose of this study is to study whether there are differences between the SSCS learning model and the TPS learning model on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This research is a quantitative study with a research design. Random Design Group Pretest-Posttest Group. The results of this study obtained a P-value smaller than the significance level. Hypothesis testing from this study provides conclusions about the TPS learning model better than the SSCS learning model in improving students' mathematical problem solving abilities.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Capabilities : Impact of Improve and OSBORN Learning Models on Management Education

Desimal Jurnal Matematika ◽

10.24042/djm.v3i1.5335 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 17-26

Author(s):

Munifah Munifah ◽

Windi Septiyani ◽

Indah Tri Rahayu ◽

Rahmi Ramadhani ◽

Hasan Said Tortop

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Design Method ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Learning Models ◽

Problem Solving Skills ◽

Sample Test ◽

Problem Solving Process ◽

The Impact

Objectives The ability to solve problems is to gain knowledge and motivation in the problem solving process of students. The researcher used the IMPROVE and OSBORN learning models to improve problem solving skills. The IMPROVE and OSBORN learning models emphasize the development of optimal mathematical skills and generate new ideas in the process of problem solving. This research is used to see the impact of the IMPROVE learning model and OSBORN learning model which is better in mathematical problem solving abilities. This research uses the Quasy Experimental Design method. Hypothesis testing uses an independent sample test. The conclusion of the study is the mathematical problem solving ability of students who use the IMPROVE learning model is better than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who use the OSBORN learning model.

Download Full-text

Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Model Pembelajaran Superitem Berbantuan Scaffholding

Desimal Jurnal Matematika ◽

10.24042/djm.v1i3.3107 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 1 (3) ◽

pp. 363-371

Author(s):

Ahmad Kausar Raya ◽

Sofyan M Soleh ◽

Heny Wulandari

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Learning Models ◽

Scaled Model ◽

Class 1 ◽

And Control ◽

Better Than

This study aims to determine the effect of the use of the super-scaled model of scaffolding on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The sampling technique used was cluster random sampling with 3 classes namely experimental class 1 (the class was treated with scaffolding assisted superememe learning model), experimental class 2 (superitem learning only) and control class (the conventional treatment class). Hypothesis testing used is anava 1 cell path is not the same. The results of the study found that there were differences in students' mathematical problem solving abilities by using learning models of scaffolding assisted supermarkets. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with the super-intensive learning model assisted by scaffholding is the same as the mathematical problem-solving ability of students using superemit learning models. The mathematical problem solving ability of students with superficial learning models assisted by scaffholding is better than the students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using conventional learning models. Furthermore, the mathematical problem solving ability of students with superemit learning models is the same as the mathematical problem solving ability of students using conventional learning models.

Download Full-text

Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Problem-Based Learning dan Think Pair Share Berbantuan Geogebra Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis

Journal of Medives Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang ◽

10.31331/medivesveteran.v4i1.930 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Sutrisno Sutrisno ◽

Nita Zuliyawati ◽

Rina Dwi Setyawati

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Cooperative Learning ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Problem Based Learning ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Observation Data ◽

Learning Models ◽

Collection Methods ◽

Better Than

Penelitian ini dilatar belakangi dengan pentingnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui efektivitas model Problem Based Learning dan model Cooperative Learning tipe Think Pair Share berbantuan geogebra. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian eksperimen. Metode pengumpulan data terdiri dari dokumentasi, tes, dan observasi. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini digunakan analisis variansi, regresi, dan uji proporsi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang mendapat model PBL berbantuan geogebra memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis sama dengan siswa yang mendapat model TPS berbantuan geogebra, dan kedua model pembelajaran tersebut menghasilkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa pada model PBL dan TPS berbantuan geogebra, terdapat pengaruh keaktifan belajar siswa dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematisnya. Model PBL dan TPS berbantuan geogebra juga menghasilkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang memenuhi ketuntasan klasikal. Kata kunci: Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the importance of students' mathematical problem solving abilities. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning model and the Cooperative Learning model Think Pair Share type assisted by geogebra. The type of research used is experimental research. Data collection methods consist of documentation, testing, and observation. Data analysis in this study used analysis of variance, regression, and proportion test. The results of this study indicate that students who get geogebra-assisted PBL models have the same mathematical problem solving abilities as students who get geogebra-assisted TPS models, and both of these learning models produce students' mathematical problem-solving abilities better than conventional learning models. The results also showed that in the PBL and TPS models assisted by geogebra, there was an influence on students' learning activeness with their mathematical problem solving abilities. The geogebra-assisted PBL and TPS models also produce problem-solving abilities that meet classical completeness. Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, mathematical problem solving abilities.

Download Full-text

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran E-learning Berbantuan Media Pembelajaran Edmodo Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik

NUMERICAL Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.25217/numerical.v3i1.453 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 31-42

Author(s):

Hanifah Hanifah ◽

Nanang Supriadi ◽

Rany Widyastuti

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Quantitative Research ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Learning Material ◽

Learning Models ◽

Mathematical Problems ◽

E Learning ◽

Initial Knowledge

Mathematical problem solving is a problem solving that uses mathematical problem solving. Students in the problem solving did not use the polya method so that students succeeded in difficulties. Educators still use conventional learning models so that students become bored, passive and reluctant to ask whether going forward working on the questions given by the educator, so that new learning models need to be applied. The e-learning learning model assisted with Edmodo learning media is an online presentation material on an Edmodo account using the mobile phone of students. PAM is the knowledge learned by students before getting learning material. This study aims to study the interaction of e-learning learning models assisted by Edmodo learning media to solve mathematical problems. This study is quantitative research. Data collection used with tests, interviews, collection and collection. The data analysis technique uses two-way anava test with cells that are not the same. From the results of the analysis, the influence of the e-learning learning model on mathematical problem solving abilities. It is necessary to question the high, medium, and low mathematical initial knowledge of Great mathematical problem solving ability, then there is no difference between assisted e-learning learning models edmodo, mathematical initial knowledge of mathematical problem solving abilities.

Download Full-text

Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Means End Analysis

Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.31980/mosharafa.v8i3.534 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 435-446

Author(s):

Nur Asih ◽

Sendi Ramdhani

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Control Group ◽

Control Group Design ◽

Purposive Sampling ◽

Group Design ◽

Better Than

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.

Download Full-text

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Tugas dan Paksa Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika

Journal of Medives Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang ◽

10.31331/medivesveteran.v4i1.967 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 111

Author(s):

Leonard Leonard ◽

Kurnia Khaerul Nisa

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Learning Strategies ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Learning Models ◽

Problem Solving Skills ◽

Average Value ◽

Direct Learning

Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika merupakan salah satu tujuan pendidikan nasional di Indonesia, tetapi pencapaiannya masih tergolong rendah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian posstest-only. Pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purpose sampling. Sampel penelitian sebanyak 60 peserta didik yang terbagi dalam dua kelas (30 kelas eksperimen dan 30 kelas kontrol). Penelitian ini dilakukan di sekolah SMP N 10 Bekasi dan SMP N 26 Bekasi. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran teamdengan strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan pembelajaran . Data yang terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji beda rata-rata sampel bebas. Hasil analisis data menunjukan bahwa rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran team assisted individualization dengan strategi tugas dan paksa lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan rata-rata nilai peserta didik yang pembelajarannya menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung. Kata kunci: Model pembelajaran team assisted individualization, Strategi pembelajaran tugas dan paksa, kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika ABSTRACT This research was conducted to determine the effect of team assisted individualization learning models with task learning strategies and forced to the ability to solve mathematical problems. Mathematical problem solving ability is an ability that belongs to the national education goals, but its achievement is still relatively low. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method with a poststest-only research design. Sampling in this study uses purpose sampling technique. The study sample consisted of 60 students divided into two classes (30 experimental classes and 30 control classes). This research was conducted in the school of SMP N 10 Bekasi and SMP N 26 Bekasi. The experimental class uses team individualization learning models with task and forced learning strategies, while the control class uses direct learning. The collected data is then analyzed using independent sample t-test. The results of data analysis showed that the average value of students who learned using the team assisted individualization learning model with higher task and forced strategies compared to the average value of students who learned using direct learning models. Keywords: Team assisted individualization learning model, task and forced learning strategies, mathematical problem solving skills

Download Full-text

PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA YANG DIAJAR DENGAN PEMBELAJARAN TPS DAN GI

AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika ◽

10.30821/axiom.v9i1.7234 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 35

Author(s):

Lisa Dwi Afri ◽

Rahmadani Rahmadani

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Cooperative Learning ◽

Quantitative Study ◽

Mathematical Reasoning ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Learning Models ◽

Reasoning Problem ◽

Mathematics Ability ◽

Academic Year

Abstrak:Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang diajar dengan Think Pair Share (TPS) dan Group Investigation (GI) di kelas X MAS Amaliyah Sunggal. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan jenis eksperimen kuasi. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X MAS Amaliyah Sunggal Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020, yang selanjutnya dipilih sampel sebanyak dua kelas secara acak yaitu X-IPA3 dan X-IPA2. Data pada penelitian ini diperoleh melalui tes kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis. Selanjutnya data dianalisis menggunakan uji ANAVA dua jalur. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa, (1) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang belajar dengan TPS dengan siswa yang belajar dengan GI; dan (2) tidak ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran (TPS, GI) terhadap kemampuan matematis (penalaran, pemecahan masalah). Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran TPS dan GI memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda terhadap kemampuan penalaran dan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Kata Kunci:Penalaran, Pemecahan Masalah, Think Pair Share, Group Investigation Abstract:The purpose of this research was to determine differences in students’s reasoning and mathematical problem solving abilities by cooperative learning in Think Pair Share (TPS) and Group Investigation (GI). This research was quantitative study and a quasi eksperimen. The population was all students of grade X MAS Amaliyah Sunggal in Academic Year 2019/2020, then two class is selected as sample randomly. They were X-IPA2 dan X-IPA3. Data was collected by test of reasoning and mathematical problem solving. Then data were analyzed using the two-way ANAVA. The result showed that, (1) there were significant differences in the ability of reasoningg and mathematical problem solving of students who studied by TPS and students who studied by GI; and (2). There is no interaction between learning models (TPS and GI) and the mathematics ability (reasoning and problem solving). So it can be concluded that the TPS and GI gives a different effect on students’ mathematical reasoning and problem solving abilities. Keywords:Reasoning, Problem Solving, Think Pair Share, Group Investigation

Download Full-text

MODEL PEMBELAJARAN OSBORN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA

M A T H L I N E Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.31943/mathline.v1i2.21 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 93-102

Author(s):

Luthfiyati Nurafifah ◽

Elah Nurlaelah ◽

Dian Usdiyana

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Positive Attitude ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Control Design ◽

Learning Model ◽

Research Data ◽

The Other ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Post Test ◽

Better Than

The purpose of this research is to find out the increase of student’s mathematical problem solving competence through the implementation of Osborn Learning Model, as well as compare it with the student who earned conventional learning. In addition, the purpose of this research is to find out the increase of mathematical problem solving competence on a group of student with high, middle, and low capability. The next purpose is to find out the attitude of the students against the osborn learning model. Methods used in this research is quasi Experimenter Method with pretest and post-test Marginalized Control Design. Population on this research are all of students of VIII grades in SMPN 1 Bandung. Samples on this research are two classes of VIII grades, one class as Experimental Class and the other one as control class. Research data obtained through the test of student’s mathematical problem solving competence, questionnaire, and observation sheets. The result of this research shows that the increasing of student’s mathematical problem solving competence with Osborn Learning Model better than the increasing of student’s mathematical problem solving competence with conventional learning. There are differences in the increasing competence on the groups of high capability, middle capability and low capability in osborn class and conventional class. In general, the students give a positive attitude against Osborn Learning Model.

Download Full-text

Perbedaan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dari Penerapan Problem Solving dan Problem Posing pada Siswa SMA

Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.31980/mosharafa.v10i3.948 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

pp. 471-482

Author(s):

Meta Yulia Sari ◽

Erlina Prihatnani

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Mathematics Learning ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Learning Model ◽

Problem Posing ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Control Group ◽

Learning Models ◽

Ability Tests ◽

Quasi Experimental

AbstrakPentingnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah dalam pembelajaran matematika belum diikuti dengan pencapaian yang baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menerapkan model pembelajaran Problem Solving dan Problem Posing serta menguji ada tidaknya perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dari kedua model tersebut. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada kelas X salah satu SMA Negeri di Salatiga dengan materi trigonometri. Sampel sebanyak 53 siswa, terbagi dalam dua kelompok eksperimen. Penelitian ekperimen semu ini menggunakan desain randomaized control group pretest-postest design, dengan instrumen berbentuk tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan lembar observasi. Analisis data menggunakan kovariansi pada taraf signifikan 𝛼 = 5% dengan kemampuan awal sebagai variabel kovarian. Hasil uji hipotesis menyimpulkan bahwa dengan mengontrol kemampuan awal siswa didapat bahwa siswa yang melaksanakan model pembelajaran Problem Posing secara signifikan memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa yang melaksanakan model pembelajaran Problem Solving. Hasil ini menunjukkan pembelajaran hendaknya tidak hanya melatih siswa menyelesaikan masalah tetapi juga mengkonstruksi permasalahan. Differences in problem-solving abilities from the application of problem-solving and problem-posing in high school studentsAbstractThe importance of problem-solving abilities in mathematics learning has not been automatically followed by good achievement. This study aims to apply Problem Solving and Problem Posing learning models and to test whether there are differences in the problem-solving abilities of the two learning models. This research was conducted in class X mathematics learning at one of the public high schools in Salatiga on Trigonometry material. This quasi-experimental study used a randomized control group pretest-posttest design, with instruments in the form of problem-solving ability tests and observation sheets. The data analysis used was the covariance test at the significant level α = 5% with the initial ability as a covariate variable. The results of hypothesis testing with covariance analysis concluded that by controlling students' initial abilities it was found that there were significant differences in mathematical problem-solving abilities between the application of the two models. Students who carry out the Problem Posing learning model significantly have better mathematical problem-solving abilities than students who carry out the Problem-Solving learning model. These results indicate that learning should not only train students to solve problems but also construct problems.

Download Full-text

Eksperimentasi Model PBL dan Model GDL Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar

JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) ◽

10.25273/jipm.v6i1.1336 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Evi Yuliasari

Keyword(s):

Problem Solving ◽

Mathematical Problem ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Ability ◽

Mathematical Problem Solving ◽

Ability Test ◽

Significance Level ◽

Self Regulated Learning ◽

Regulated Learning ◽

Pbl Model

This Research aims to determine the effect of problem-based learning model and guided discovery learning model of learning ability of students' mathematical problem-solving in terms of self-regulated learning. This was a quasi-experiment research. The sampling technique is multistage random sampling. The data collection technique is mathematical problem-solving ability test on essay form and questionnaire self-regulated learning of the student. Hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA technique with 5% significance level. The conclusion of this research shows that (1) the mathematical problem-solving ability of students who are treated with PBL model is higher than the mathematical problem-solving ability of students who are treated with GDL model, (2) there is interaction effect between learning model and self regulated learning to mathematical problem solving abilities of student , (3) mathematical problem solving abilities treated by PBL model is higher than mathematical problem solving ability given GDL model in groups of students who have high self regulated learning, (4) there is no difference in mathematical problem-solving ability among students who are given Treatment of PBL models and treated with GDL models in groups of students who have low self-regulated learning.

Download Full-text