Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Each submission is anonymously reviewed by an average of three independent reviewers, to ensure the final high standard and quality of each accepted submission. • Conference submission management system: Online submission • Number of submissions received: 75 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 75 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 52 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 69% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviews per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 40 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: We developed the strict peer review procedures and invite relevant experts to serve as editors in order to control the quality of the papers. First, all articles will be subjected to peer review administered by editors. Then, reviews will be conducted by expert referees, who have been requested to provide unbiased and constructive comments aimed, whenever possible, at improving the work. Final, editors will take all reasonable steps to ensure the quality of the materials they publish and their decision to accept or reject a paper for publication will be based only on the merits of the work and the relevance to the conference theme. The following criteria will be considered by the editors and referees in their evaluation: (1) Is the subject matter within the scope of the conference? (2) Does the paper contain enough original results to warrant publication? (3) Is the paper technically sound and free of errors? (4) Is the work clearly and concisely presented? Is it well organized? (5) Does the title clearly and sufficiently reflect its con tents? (6) Is the abstract informative? Are the main results and conclusions mentioned? (7) Are the illustrations of adequate quality, relevant and understandable? (8) Does the bibliography give a clear view of the current state-of-the-art in the domain? (9) Is the quality of the language satisfactory? • Contact person for queries: Name : Guosong Jiang Affiliation: Huanggang Normal University Email : [email protected]