scholarly journals The carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration potential of conservation plant Aquilaria malaccensis

2021 ◽  
Vol 724 (1) ◽  
pp. 012063
Author(s):  
S W Utomo ◽  
P A Pambudi ◽  
A Pramudianto ◽  
Sudaryanto
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 05016 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Faisal Alshalif ◽  
J.M. Irwan ◽  
N. Othman ◽  
M.M. Zamer ◽  
L.H. Anneza

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan Ellingboe ◽  
Jay Arehart ◽  
Wil Srubar

Pervious concrete, which has recently found new applications in buildings, is both energy- and carbon-intensive to manufacture. However, similar to normal concrete, some of the initial CO2 emissions associated with pervious concrete can be sequestered through a process known as carbonation. In this work, the theoretical formulation and application of a mathematical model for estimating the carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration potential of pervious concrete is presented. Using principles of cement and carbonation chemistry, the model related mixture proportions of pervious concretes to their theoretical in situ CO2 sequestration potential. The model was subsequently employed in a screening life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the percentage of recoverable CO2 emissions—namely, the ratio of in situ sequesterable CO2 to initial cradle-to-gate CO2 emissions—for common pervious concrete mixtures. Results suggest that natural carbonation can recover up to 12% of initial CO2 emissions and that CO2 sequestration potential is maximized for pervious concrete mixtures with (i) lower water-to-cement ratios, (ii) higher compressive strengths, (iii) lower porosities, and (iv) lower hydraulic conductivities. However, LCA results elucidate that mixtures with maximum CO2 sequestration potential (i.e., mixtures with high cement contents and CO2 recoverability) emit more CO2 from a net-emissions perspective, despite their enhanced in situ CO2 sequestration potential.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane H. Smith ◽  
Grant Bromhal ◽  
W. Neal Sams ◽  
Sinisha Jikich ◽  
Turgay Ertekin

Summary Coalbed methane now accounts for a significant fraction of domestic natural-gas production. Injection of carbon dioxide (CO2) into coal seams is a promising technology for reducing anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions and increasing ultimate production of coalbed methane. Reservoir simulations are an inexpensive method for designing field projects and predicting optimal tradeoffs between maximum sequestration and maximum methane production. Optimum project design and operation are expected to depend on the anisotropy of the permeability along the face-cleat and butt-cleat directions, the spacing between cleats, and the sorption isotherms for methane and CO2. In this work, a dual-porosity coalbed-methane simulator is used to model primary and secondary production of methane from coal for a variety of coal properties and operational parameters. It is assumed that the face and butt cleats are perpendicular to each other, with horizontal wells parallel to one type of cleat and perpendicular to the other. The well pattern consists of four horizontal production wells that form a rectangle, with four shorter horizontal wells centered within the rectangle. In the limiting case of no permeability anisotropy, the central wells form a "plus" sign within the square of production wells. All wells are operated as producers of methane and water until a specified reservoir pressure is reached, after which the central wells are operated as injectors for CO2. Production of methane continues until the CO2 concentration in the produced gas is too high. The simulation results predict the optimum lengths of the injection wells along the face- and butt-cleat directions and show how these optimum lengths depend on the permeabilities in the two directions. If the cleat spacing is sufficiently small, and diffusion of the gas through the pores to the cleats is sufficiently rapid, instantaneous sorption may be assumed. Otherwise, the field performance depends on the diffusion-time constant that characterizes the rate of transfer between the cleats and the coal matrix. The pressures at which the injection wells are operated also affect the amounts of CO2 sequestered through the pressures and volumes of the sorption isotherms. Introduction and Background Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases may be leading to changes in the Earth's climate. A rise in the globe's average temperature is expected, among other consequences. The main anthropogenic greenhouse gas is CO2. The concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is increasing continuously; therefore, many countries have pledged to reduce, by 2010, the emissions of greenhouse gases up to 8% relative to levels pertaining to 1990. Consequently, CO2 must be captured and stored. Among storage options, the underground storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs and unmineable coals is considered to have the most favorable economics. This option is also expected to have a low environmental impact. Several federal agencies have major programs for CO2sequestration. Unmineable coal seams are a very attractive potential storage medium forCO2. The injection of CO2 in coalbeds may be the most efficient option of all storage possibilities if, while CO2 is stored, the recovery of coalbed methane is improved. The process of displacing the remaining methane by CO2 after the primary production of methane is referred to as enhanced coalbed methane(ECBM). Carbon dioxide/ECBM technology and implementation were inspired by CO2solvent flooding, one of the most successful enhanced-oil-recovery methods in the U.S. and worldwide. The worldwide CO2-sequestration potential by use of ECBM has been estimated at 150 Gt of CO2. A relatively small but significant sequestration potential of 5 to 15 Gt may be profitable, generating net profits estimated at U.S. $15/t for the most favorable cases. A joint U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE) and industry project has been initiated to study the reservoir mechanisms and field performance of CO2 sequestration in the world's first experimental (pure) CO2/ECBM recovery pilot, the Allison unit field, operated by Burlington Resources. Initially, the pilot was intended to test CO2/ECBM, but in time it evolved into a CO2-sequestration project. The pilot consists of four CO2-injection wells and nine methane-production wells, drilled on 320-acre spacing. The Allison unit CO2/ECBM shows that methane production has been enhanced by CO2 injection and that CO2 has been sequestered. In this project, vertical wells are used for both production and injection. However, it has been shown that horizontal wells can increaseCO2-injection rate and improve aerial sweep, which can lead to more-favorable flood economics. The sweep advantage is greatest in thin formations with wide well spacing, such as coal seams in the eastern United States. Consequently, the U.S. Dept. of Energy is cofunding a 7-year CO2-sequestration/ECBM project that uses horizontal injectors and producers. The well pattern used in the present study was suggested by the pattern chosen for that project.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 3334-3340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongxian Cheng ◽  
Youhua Ma ◽  
Xin Li ◽  
Wei-Ping Pan ◽  
Zhiming Zhang

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 408-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loretta Gratani ◽  
Rosangela Catoni ◽  
Giacomo Puglielli ◽  
Laura Varone ◽  
Maria Fiore Crescente ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-240
Author(s):  
Gisandu K. Malunguja ◽  
Ashalata Devi ◽  
Mhuji Kilonzo ◽  
Chrispinus D.K. Rubanza

Forests play a key role in climate change mitigation through sequestering and storing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, there is inadequate information about carbon accumulation and sequestered by community reserved forests in Tanzania. A study was carried to quantify the amount of carbon sequestered in two forests namely; Nyasamba and Bubinza of Kishapu district, northwestern Tanzania. A ground-based field survey design under a systematic sampling technique was adopted. A total of 45 circular plots (15 m radius) along transects were established. The distances between transect and plots were maintained at 550 and 300 m, respectively. Data on herbaceous C stocking potential was determined using destructive harvest method while tree carbon stocking was estimated by allometric equations. The collected data were organized on excel datasheet followed by descriptive analysis for quantitative information using Computer Microsoft Excel and SPSS software version 20, while soil samples were analyzed based on the standard laboratory procedures. Results revealed higher carbon sequestration of 102.49±39.87 and 117.52±10.27 for soil pools than plants both herbaceous (3.01±1.12 and 6.27±3.79 t CO2e/yr) and trees (5.70±3.15 and 6.60±2.88 t CO2e/yr) for Nyasamba and Bubinza respectively. The study recorded a potential variation of soil carbon sequestration, which varied across depths category (P < 0.05). However, there was no difference across sites (P >0.05) and species (P > 0.05) for herbaceous and trees. The findings of this study portrayed a significantly low value for carbon stocking and sequestration potential for enhanced climate change mitigation. Therefore, proper management of community reserved forest is required to accumulate more C for enhancing stocking potential hence climate change mitigation through CO2 sequestration offsets mechanism.


Author(s):  
Zarina Itam ◽  
Hafiz Zawawi ◽  
Yuovendra Sivaganese ◽  
Salmia Beddu ◽  
Nur Liyana Mohd Kamal

In recent years, the production of cement has grown globally in a very rapid manner due to the modernization of the world we live in, and after fossil fuels and land-use change, cement production is the third-largest source of anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide, CO2. Cement being the primary binding material for concrete and with the prospects for the concrete industry continues to grow so will the emissions of CO2. Hence, a method to reduce the CO2 production while keeping up with the progression of the concrete industry is very crucial in current times. This is where CO2 sequestration comes in. It is a process where CO2 is converted into a mineral which will then be trapped into the concrete forever. Required data to carry out the research between CO2 sequestered concrete and concrete without CO2 have been observed, obtained and tabulated as necessary. These data are then used to compare the concrete samples with one another and also prove the theoretical effects of CO2 exposure to concrete. Hence, experimental results on the compressive strength of the concrete samples for 7, 14 and 28 days has also been tabulated, graphed and further disputed. The objective of this research is mainly to determine the compressive strength of CO2 sequestered concrete in comparison with concrete without CO2 in order to decrease the effects the concrete industry has on the environment. The compressive strength of concrete samples with sequestration of CO2 gas is expected to be higher than of the concrete without CO2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document