scholarly journals Precision Fishery Management Framework Based on Fisheries Management Area

2021 ◽  
Vol 912 (1) ◽  
pp. 012074
Author(s):  
Yonvitner ◽  
J Sartin

Abstract Implementing precision fisheries management is a challenge for fisheries governance. Precision fisheries management might depend on the availability of data, area, carrying capacity, utilization, labor, industrial capacity, and fish consumption of the community. For Indonesia, the Fisheries Management Areas (FMAs) approach could become the basis for traceability and measurability of precision fisheries management. To ensure its effectiveness, the design of precision fisheries management must be started with the development of a logical framework, which then serves as a foundation for a further management design. This paper aims to present a management framework for precision fisheries management based on Fisheries Management Area. The framework covers sub sector in fisheries including capture fisheries, aquaculture, fish processing, and conservation activities. Meanwhile, supervision is the cornerstone that will oversee the implementation of all the fisheries sub sector. The framework shows that spatial-based data is one of the determinants in the efficacy of precision fisheries management.

2021 ◽  
Vol 716 (1) ◽  
pp. 012022
Author(s):  
Umi Muawanah ◽  
Nendah Kurniasari ◽  
Radityo Pramodha ◽  
Armen Zulham ◽  
Lathifatul Rosyidah

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Suherman Banon Atmaja ◽  
Duto Nugroho

Pengertian dasar untuk pengelolaan perikanan terkait dengan fungsi fungsi biologi, sosial, teknologi, ekonomi serta lingkungan sumber daya sebagai komponen yang saling berhubungan untuk terjaminnya pengelolaan secara berkelanjutan. Stok ikan, ekosistem dan masyarakat nelayan merupakan salah satu kesatuan yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dalam sistem yang dinamis, dimana perubahan taktik dan strategi pemanfaatan masih merupakan suatu hal yang banyak dilakukan dalam rangka penyesuaian antara faktor teknis dan ekonomis yang sering kali mengabaikan pertimbangan bio-ekologi sumberdaya ikan. Sasaran pendekatan dan kebijakan pengelolaan perikanan di berbagai negara sudah mulai berubah, diawali dengan pendekatan memaksimalkan tangkapan tahunan dan ketenaga-kerjaan menuju ke konservasi dan pengelolaan berbasis pelayanan ekosistem. Konsep pengelolaan berbasis masyarakat dan ko-manajemen masih terbatas pada pengelolaan kawasan konservasi dan habitat terumbu karang. Adanya kesenjangan dan perbedaan antara kepentingan kawasan konservasi sebagai akibat kurangnya pemahaman kolektif terhadap tujuan pengelolaan, dan kerapkali menyebabkan aktifitas perikanan tangkap sebagai bagian dari kebutuhan ekonomis berbenturan dengan fungsi kawasan konservasi dalam jangka panjang. Pengendalian upaya penangkapan dan memahami dinamika perikanan, serta mengelola nelayan menjadi prioritas untuk pengelolaan sumber daya ikan, sedangkan konsep pengelolaan berbasis masyarakat dan ko-manajemen ditempatkan sebagai pelengkap untuk menutupi kelemahan aspek legal wilayah pengelolaan perikanan atau sumber daya ikan.Basic understanding of fisheries management related to biology, social, technology and economic function of fish resources. Fish stocks, ecosystem and fishers community are the integrated component under the dynamic of fisheries system, where as changing and on fishing tactic and strategy still exist to adjust between biology, technics and economics aspects. It is obvious that all technological creeps oftenly ignored the bio-ecological consideration of fish resources. The fisheries management and its policy were gradually shifting from maximize the catch, job opportunity become conservation and ecosystem based fisheries management. The concept of community-based management and co management is still limited to the management of conservation areas and coral reef habitats. The existence of gaps and differences between the interests of the conservation area as a result of a lack of understanding collective to the management objectives and often causing fishing activities as part of the economic needs clash with the function of conservation areas in the long term. Control efforts to capture and understand the dynamics of fisheries, as well as managing fishing is a priority for the management of fish resources, while the concept of community-based management and co management issued as a supplement to cover the weakness of legal aspects of the fishery management area or fishery resource.


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 4188-4193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kailin Kroetz ◽  
Matthew N. Reimer ◽  
James N. Sanchirico ◽  
Daniel K. Lew ◽  
Justine Huetteman

The emergence of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has broadened the policy scope of fisheries management by accounting for the biological and ecological connectivity of fisheries. Less attention, however, has been given to the economic connectivity of fisheries. If fishers consider multiple fisheries when deciding where, when, and how much to fish, then management changes in one fishery can generate spillover impacts in other fisheries. Catch-share programs are a popular fisheries management framework that may be particularly prone to generating spillovers given that they typically change fishers’ incentives and their subsequent actions. We use data from Alaska fisheries to examine spillovers from each of the main catch-share programs in Alaska. We evaluate changes in participation—a traditional indicator in fisheries economics—in both the catch-share and non–catch-share fisheries. Using network analysis, we also investigate whether catch-share programs change the economic connectivity of fisheries, which can have implications for the socioeconomic resilience and robustness of the ecosystem, and empirically identify the set of fisheries impacted by each Alaska catch-share program. We find that cross-fishery participation spillovers and changes in economic connectivity coincide with some, but not all, catch-share programs. Our findings suggest that economic connectivity and the potential for cross-fishery spillovers deserve serious consideration, especially when designing and evaluating EBFM policies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Aris Budiarto ◽  
Lucky Adrianto ◽  
Mukhlis Kamal

<p>Laut Jawa (WPPNRI 712) memiliki karakteristik permasalahan dalam pengelolaan perikanan rajungan yaitu berkurangnya stok sumberdaya rajungan dan tinggi nya jumlah armada penangkapan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kondisi pengelolaan perikanan rajungan di perairan Laut Jawa berdasarkan pada indikator pengelolaan perikanan dengan pendekatan ekosistem (Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management-EAFM). Enam domain indikator EAFM yang digunakan sebagai dasar untuk analisis adalah (1) Sumber Daya Ikan; (2) Habitat dan Ekosistem; (3) Teknik Penangkapan; (4) Sosial; (5) Ekonomi; dan (6) Kelembagaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai skor komposit EAFM tergolong kategori sedang dengan kisaran antara 1,5 – 2,5. Hasil penilaian aggregat seluruh domain diperoleh nilai skor densitas berkisar antara 6,3 – 55,9. Domain memiliki densitas tertinggi adalah domain sosial dan domain kelembagaan sebesar 54,7 dan 55,9 dengan kategori sedang. Domain habitat/ekosistem dan domain ekonomi memiliki nilai skor 36,5 dan 20,7 dengan kategori kurang. Domain sumberdaya ikan dan domain teknik penangkapan memiliki nilai skor 6,3 dan 16,3 dengan kategori buruk. Secara keseluruhan hasil penilaian indikator EAFM menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan rajungan di WPPNRI 712 dalam kategori buruk hingga sedang. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini adalah melaksanakan perbaikan pengelolaan perikanan rajungan secara bertahap dengan melakukan 5 (lima) langkah pengelolaan yaitu; pengaturan rajungan yang boleh ditangkap, pengaturan musim penangkapan, pengendalian alat tangkap dan daerah penangkapan, perlindungan dan rehabilitasi habitat serta melaksanakan restoking.</p><p> </p><p>Java Sea waters (Fisheries Management Area 712) is one of the main live crab habitat which is also the main blue swimming crab (BSC) production centers in Indonesia. FMA 712 has the characteristics of BSC fishery management problems is lower stock of crabs and the high number of fishing fleet. This study was aims to determine the condition of BSC fishery management in Java Sea waters, which developed based on performance indicators of ecosystem approach (EAFM). The six EAFM indicators used as the basis for analysis (1) Fisheries Resources; (2) Habitat and Ecosystem; (3) Fishing Technology; (4) Social; (5) Economic; and (6) Institutional. The results of each research domain indicates that the value of the composite score EAFM classified as category medium in the range of 1.5-2.5. The entire aggregate assessment results obtained domain scores density values ranging between 6.3 - 55.9. Domain which has high density is the domain of social and institutional domains of 54.7 and 55.9 in the medium category. Domain habitat /ecosystem and the economic domain has a score of 36.5 and 20.7 with less category. For domain domain fish resources and fishing techniques have a score of 6.3 and 16.3 with the bad category. The overall of EAFM indicators ranged between 6.3 - 55.9 Indicating that the management of BSC in FMA 712 under poor to moderate category. Recommendations of this study is to carry out repairs BSC fishery management gradually to perform five steps management; minimum legal size for capture, open closed fishing season, control gear and fishing areas, protection and rehabilitation of habitat and implement restoking.<br /><br /></p>


2007 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 846-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjartan Hoydal

Abstract Hoydal, K. 2007. Viewpoint: the interface between scientific advice and fisheries management. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 846–850. Basic elements in responsible, robust, and sustainable fishery management frameworks are well understood and easily listed. Common sense and international law underline the prominent role of science in management. Most managers request peer-reviewed advice based on an objective assessment of the impact of fisheries on marine ecosystems, to create a basis for sustainable and profitable fisheries. Management systems in the North Atlantic rely extensively on advice on total allowable catches (TACs) to control fishing mortality in stocks under regulation. This leads to an unhelpful focus on inherently uncertain catch forecasts. With the wisdom of hindsight, TACs have rarely led to the predicted reduction in fishing mortality. And because of the focus on TACs, other elements in the management framework, notably overcapacity and other economic and social constraints, do not receive the necessary attention. A comparison of the way fishing advice is acquired with the same process in the hydrocarbon extraction industry draws attention to the multi-user problem in marine fisheries management.


2021 ◽  
Vol 800 (1) ◽  
pp. 012007
Author(s):  
Suryanto ◽  
D Oktaviani ◽  
D Nugroho ◽  
R F Anggawangsa

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 1668-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Garcia ◽  
J. Rice ◽  
A. Charles

Abstract Balanced harvest (BH) proposes to distribute a moderate mortality from fishing across the widest possible range of species, stocks, and sizes in an ecosystem, in proportion to their natural productivity so that the relative size and species composition are maintained, in line with the CBD requirement for sustainable use. This proposal has many and not always intuitive implications for fisheries management, e.g. in relation to selectivity, protection of juveniles and spawning sites, models of harvesting strategies, a focus on size and species, the impacts of discarding, aspects of emblematic species and ecosystem services, operational complexity, partial implementation, ecosystem rebuilding, and relations with broader management frameworks. The paper closes with a discussion of BH implementation, concluding that a logical step would be to integrate several separate initiatives to move fisheries into a more ecosystem-conscious context. Implementation challenges will be encountered, but there are lessons to be drawn from fishery ecosystems already close to BH, as in some tropical multispecies fisheries, and further, the implementation challenges are already being taken on in many well-managed fisheries and areas as management begins to address the realities of what ecosystem-based fishery management actually entails.


2006 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 714-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Baron ◽  
A. C. Dick ◽  
D. McCartney ◽  
J. A. Basarab ◽  
E. K. Okine

2021 ◽  
Vol 869 (1) ◽  
pp. 012018
Author(s):  
R Pramoda ◽  
N Shafitri ◽  
B V Indahyanti ◽  
A Zulham ◽  
S Koeshendrajana ◽  
...  

Abstract The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS 1982) affirms that the government has sovereign rights, jurisdiction, and obligations in Indonesia’s EEZ. Indonesia has an interest in protecting sovereign rights and increasing state revenues in the waters of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). That sovereign right is to use fishery resources responsibly for the benefit of the nation and society as a whole. The sole purpose of this qualitative research is to optimize fisheries utilization in the Rote Ndao Regency whose waters include the Fisheries Management Area of 573 (FMA-573) in the EEZ. The analysis had been carried out with a case study approach and then descriptively elaborated. The results showed that: 1) the use of fisheries in FMA-573 was carried out by traditional fishermen (using vessels ≤10 Gross Tonnage/GT) and fishermen using vessels >29 GT; 2) supervision is still needed for the improvement of ships and human resources; 3) there are still violations of territorial waters by traditional Indonesian fishermen. The policy recommendations that must be carried out by the government are: 1) encouraging local fishermen to catch fish in the FMA-573 area by providing stimulus for ships and fishing gear; 2) allocate budget to purchase a new fleet of ships and add supervisors; 3) increase the number of fishery instructors to foster and socialize the boundaries of Indonesia’s EEZ with Australia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 324 ◽  
pp. 01007
Author(s):  
Yulius Yulius ◽  
Vaninda Aidina ◽  
Muhammad Ramdhan ◽  
August Daulat

The fishing ground is identical and closely related to chlorophyll-a abundance in the waters, associated with its fisheries potential. This research has been conducted to determine the concentration and distribution of chlorophyll-a in the seas, especially in the Fisheries Management Area (FMA) 712 encompassing the Java Sea. The analysis used monthly time-series data collected from the satellite imagery over the last 11 years, taken through the ERDDAP website. The mean concentration of chlorophyll-a in the study area was 1.13 mg/l in June 2013. Based on 11 years of data processing, it can be concluded that the highest concentration of chlorophyll-a occurred in the west monsoon season from November to April, where increased rainfall caused the nutrient wash from terrestrial to the open waters. The lowest chlorophyll-a concentration happened in the east monsoon season from April to November, where the dry season arrived. The existence of pelagic fishes in FMA 712, such as Sardinella Lemurs and Sardinella Fimbriata, in waters highly influenced by the chlorophyll-a concentration, while Thunnus Sp. and Exocoetidae Sp. not affected significantly to the existence of chlorophyll-a concentration and its distribution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document