scholarly journals Equivalent-linear seismic ground response analysis in Palu area

2021 ◽  
Vol 930 (1) ◽  
pp. 012089
Author(s):  
A Jalil ◽  
T F Fathani ◽  
I Satyarno ◽  
W Wilopo

Abstract The 7.5 Mw Palu earthquake on September 28, 2018, was caused by the Palu Koro fault. This earthquake produced forceful wave propagation in the soil layer and generated enormous surface damage in Balaroa, Petobo, and Jono Oge. Estimations of soil amplification at a specific location are helpful as guidance for infrastructure development. This study examined the effect of local soil in modifying the one-dimensional linear soil response in Balaroa, Petobo, and Jono Oge regions, considering the data of various sites in those regions. The soil response was observed to obtain the synthetic input motion and its effects in the time history of surface acceleration, the ratio of shear stress to effective vertical stress to spectrum response time, and the Fourier amplitude versus frequency ratio. Amplification is standard for ground acceleration, which considers the strong ground motion with the acquired frequency and duration of the content. The results showed that the peak of ground acceleration amplification factors for Balaroa, Petobo, and Jono Oge was around 1.49, 2.05, and 1.27 times, respectively. With a lack of information at the particular site, designers will use the response spectrum obtained along the soil layer to develop earthquake-resistant geotechnical structures in locations close to Palu.

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Komak Panah ◽  
Aylin Nouri

Recent code provisions for building and other structures (1994 and 1997 NEHRP provisions, 1997 UBC) have adopted new site classification. The new site classification system is based on average shear wave velocity to a depth of 30 m. when the shear wave velocity is not available; other soil properties such as undrained shear strength can be used. The study of propagation damages in various earthquakes illustrates the importance of the site effect on the ground seismic characteristics. From the point of the earthquake engineering view, the most important characteristics of the strong ground motion are amplitude, frequency content and duration. All of these properties have a significant effect on earthquake damage. The behavior of soils under cyclic loading is basically nonlinear and hysteretic. Ground response analysis is used to predict the movements of the ground and develop a design response spectrum in order to determine the dynamic stresses and strains and earthquake forces. The profile was studied by using various methods of soil response analysis and finally, the results were examined. In this paper, soil responses were examined by NERA, EERA software and the results compared with each other. Eventually, we concluded that the values obtained from the EERA are more than the value obtained from the NEERA software.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiv Shankar Kumar ◽  
A. Murali Krishna

In this study, one dimensional equivalent–linear ground response analyses were performed for some typical sites in the Guwahati city, India. Six bore locations covering about 250 km2 area of the city were considered for the analyses. As the strong motion significantly influences the ground response, seven different recorded ground motions, varying in magnitude (6.1 to 8.1) and other ground motion parameters, were adopted. Seismic site analyses were carried out for all layers of borelogs using all the seven earthquakes. Results are presented in terms of surface acceleration histories, strain and shear stress ratio variation, response spectrum, Fourier amplitude ratio versus frequency. The results indicate that accelerations were amplified the most at the surface level. The range of peak ground acceleration (PGA) values obtained at the ground surface is about 0.2 g to 0.79 for a range of PGA considered at bedrock level (rigid half space at bottom of borelog) of 0.1 g to 0.34 g. The Fourier amplifications of ground motion at surface are in the range of 4.14 – 8.99 for a frequency band of 1.75 Hz to 3.13 Hz. The maximum spectral acceleration at six locations varies in the range of 1.0 g – 4.71 g for all the seven earthquakes. The study clearly demonstrated the role for site effect and the type of ground motion on the ground response. For a given earthquake motion, amplification factors at surface level change by almost about 20% to 70% depending on local site conditions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1773-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ç. İnce ◽  
L. Yılmazoğlu

Abstract. In this work, the surface ground motion that occurs during an earthquake in ground sections having different topographic forms has been examined with one and two dynamic site response analyses. One-dimensional analyses were undertaken using the Equivalent-Linear Earthquake Response Analysis (EERA) program based on the equivalent linear analysis principle and the Deepsoil program which is able to make both equivalent linear and nonlinear analyses and two-dimensional analyses using the Plaxis 8.2 software. The viscous damping parameters used in the dynamic site response analyses undertaken with the Plaxis 8.2 software were obtained using the DeepSoil program. In the dynamic site response analyses, the synthetic acceleration over a 475-year return period representing the earthquakes in Istanbul was used as the basis of the bedrock ground motion. The peak ground acceleration obtained different depths of soils and acceleration spectrum values have been compared. The surface topography and layer boundaries in the 5-5' cross section which cuts across the study area west to east were selected in order to examine the effect of the land topography and layer boundaries on the analysis results, and were flattened and compared with the actual status. The analysis results showed that the characteristics of the surface ground motion change in relation to the varying local soil conditions and land topography.


Author(s):  
Akihito Otani ◽  
Teruyoshi Otoyo ◽  
Hideo Hirai ◽  
Hirohide Iiizumi ◽  
Hiroshi Shimizu ◽  
...  

This paper, which is part of the series entitled “Development of an Evaluation Method for Seismic Isolation Systems of Nuclear Power Facilities”, shows the linear seismic response of crossover piping installed in a seismically isolated plant. The crossover piping, supported by both isolated and non-isolated buildings, deforms with large relative displacement between the two buildings and the seismic response of the crossover piping is caused by two different seismic excitations from the buildings. A flexible and robust structure is needed for the high-pressure crossover piping. In this study, shaking tests on a 1/10 scale piping model and FEM analyses were performed to investigate the seismic response of the crossover piping which was excited and deformed by two different seismic motions under isolated and non-isolated conditions. Specifically, as linear response analysis of the crossover piping, modal time-history analysis and response spectrum analysis with multiple excitations were carried out and the applicability of the analyses was confirmed. Moreover, the seismic response of actual crossover piping was estimated and the feasibility was evaluated.


2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 2210-2215
Author(s):  
Jun Jun Wang ◽  
Lu Lu Yi

Modal analysis is also known as dynamic analysis for mode-superposition method. In the seismic response analysis of linear structural systems, it is one of the most commonly used and the most effective ways. Through the modal analysis of building structure, we can get some basic performance parameters of the structure. These parameters can help us make qualitative judgments for the respond of a structure first, and can help us judge whether they meet demands for conceptual design. Modal analysis is also the basis of other dynamic response analysis, including dynamic time history analysis and response spectrum analysis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 915-916 ◽  
pp. 122-125
Author(s):  
Xiao Fei Li ◽  
Rui Sun ◽  
Xiao Bo Yu

In order to test the applicable of the seismic response analysis procedures SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 for class ІІ site, 17 stations and 35 underground strong motion records of KiK-net are selected from Class ІІ site. 210 working conditions are used to verify the applicability of the two soil seismic response analysis programs at Class ІІ site. These two programs are used to calculate the selected working conditions, giving the peak acceleration of the ground, the shear strain and the ground acceleration response spectra. By analyzing the results of the two programs and the measured results to assess the degree of difference between the two methods and which program is closer to the real situation. Studies have shown that in class ІІ site, in most cases, the results of SHAKE2000 and LSSRLI-1 differ little. While comparing with the actual records, SHAKE2000 is closer to the strong motion records.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.H. Amjadi ◽  
Ali johari

Abstract The field and laboratory evidence of nonlinear soil behavior, even at small strains, emphasizes the ‎importance of employing nonlinear methods in seismic ground response analysis. Additionally, ‎determination of dynamic characteristics of soil layers always includes some degree of uncertainty. Most of ‎previous stochastic studies of ground response analysis have focused only on uncertainties of soil ‎parameters, and the effect of soil sample location has been mostly ignored. This study attempts to couple ‎nonlinear time-domain ground response analysis with uncertainty of soil parameters considering existing ‎boreholes’ ‎location through a geostatistical method using a program written in MATLAB. To evaluate ‎the efficiency of the proposed method, stochastic seismic ground responses at construction location were compared with those of the non-stationary random ‎field method‎ through real site data. The ‎results demonstrate that applying the boreholes’ ‎location significantly affects not only the ground ‎responses but also their Coefficient Of Variation (COV). Furthermore, the mean value of the seismic ‎responses is affected more considerably by the values of soil parameters at the vicinity of the construction location. It is also inferred that considering boreholes’ location may reduce the COV of the seismic ‎responses. Among the surface responses in the studied site, the values of Peak Ground Displacement (PGD) ‎and Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) reflect the highest and ‎lowest dispersion due to uncertainties of soil ‎properties through both non-stationary random field and geostatistical methods.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyan Lan ◽  
Juan Liu ◽  
Xing Song

Abstract. In the complex medium system of sea area, the overlying sea water and the surface soft soil have a significant impact on the seafloor ground motion, which brings great seismic risk to the safety of offshore engineering structures. In this paper, four sets of typical free field models are constructed and established, which are land model, land model with surface soft soil, sea model and sea model with surface soft soil. The dynamic finite difference method is used to carry out two-dimensional seismic response analysis of typical free field based on the input forms about P and SV wave. By comparing the seismic response analysis results of four groups of calculation models, the effects of overlying seawater and soft soil on peak acceleration and acceleration response spectrum are studied. The results show that when SV wave is input, the peak acceleration and response spectrum of the surface of soft soil on the surface and the seabed surface can be amplified, while the overlying sea water can significantly reduce the ground motion. When P wave is used, the effect of overlying seawater and soft soil on peak acceleration and response spectrum of surface and seabed can be ignored. The peak acceleration decreases first and then increases from the bottom to the surface, and the difference of peak acceleration calculated by four free field models is not obvious. The results show that the overlying sea water and the surface soft soil layer have little effect on the peak acceleration of ground motion below the surface.


Author(s):  
Satoru Kai ◽  
Tomoyoshi Watakabe ◽  
Naoaki Kaneko ◽  
Kunihiro Tochiki ◽  
Makoto Moriizumi ◽  
...  

The piping in a nuclear power plant is laid across multiple floors of a single building or two buildings, which are supported at many points. As the piping is excited by multiple-inputs from the supporting points during an earthquake, seismic response analysis by multiple excitations is needed to obtain the exact seismic response of the piping. However, few experiments involving such multiple excitation have been performed to verify the validity of multiple excitation analysis. Therefore, analysis of the seismic design of piping in Japan is performed by the enveloped Floor Response Spectrum (FRS), which covers all floor response spectra at all supporting points. The piping response estimated by enveloped FRS is conservative in most cases compared with the actual seismic response by multiple excitations. To perform rational seismic design and evaluation, it is important to investigate the seismic response by multiple excitations and to verify the validity of the analytical method by multiple excitation test. This paper reports the validation results of the multiple-excitation analysis of piping compared with the results of the multiple excitations shaking test using triple uni-axial shaking table and a 3-dimensional piping model (89.1mm diameter and 5.5mm thickness). Three directional moments from the analysis and the shaking test were compared on the validation. As the result, it is confirmed that the analysis by multiple time history excitation corresponds with the test result.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document