scholarly journals Transition Period of Reforming Shared Construction Participation System in Housing Construction of the Russian Federation: Factors and Risks

Author(s):  
Tatiana Kubasova ◽  
Irina Tsvigun
2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-78
Author(s):  
S. N. Gusarova ◽  
Yu. M. Erokhina ◽  
D. I. Kramok ◽  
E. I. Khunuzidi

Since September 1, 2019, GOST ISO/IEC 17025–2019 has been enacted as a national standard in the Russian Federation. The novel standard imposes a number of fundamentally new requirements for testing laboratories (hereinafter referred to as the IL or laboratory), and also supplements and specifies the requirements previously regulated by GOST ISO/IEC 17025–2009. In this regard, in order to transfer laboratories to the new requirements, the FSA issued an order in August 2019 listing the mandatory activities that IL must fulfill to bring their activities in line with the new requirements. However, a transition period desired for matching these requirements is absent on a practical level for a number of the laboratories. The purpose of the article is to facilitate a gentle, efficient and pain-free move from the requirements of GOST ISO/IEC 17025–2009 to the new requirements of GOST ISO/IEC 17025–2019, including compliance with new changes in accreditation criteria. We carried out a comparative analysis of the requirements of the new and previous versions of the standard and marked each new and significant item to which the laboratory should pay attention first of all. The new standard focuses on the application of the process approach, risk and opportunity management, as well as on implementation of the policy of impartiality, independence, minimization of competitive interests and confidentiality. The article describes the planning, implementation and monitoring of each event or phase of the transition of testing laboratories to new requirements. Moreover, the recommendations on the structure of the «Quality Manual» and self-assessment on the compliance of IL activities and QMS with the new requirements, including the use of statistical methods for substantiation of the correctness of the assessment are given as an example of the implementation of IL capabilities.


2021 ◽  
pp. 33-48
Author(s):  
R.R. Gumerov ◽  
I.A. Kirichenko

The article is devoted to the substantiation of methodological approaches to the identification and assessment of long-term socially significant effects of state programs of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the domestic methodology and practice of developing and evaluating the effectiveness of state programs of the Russian Federation are subjected to critical analysis. It is stated that in the adopted model of assessing efficiency («as is»), socially significant effects of government programs are assessed indirectly through the program outcomes and indicators, and such an approach significantly reduces the completeness and reliability of the estimates obtained. The proposed model for assessing «how it should be», based on the implementation of the principles, procedures and tools used in the best foreign practice for assessing the effects of state programs, will increase the level of substantiation of the contribution of state programs of the Russian Federation to the socio-economic development of the country, individual industries and spheres of the national economy, human capital. Among the innovations are: differentiation of the concepts of «efficiency» and «effectiveness» of the state program; identification of the entire spectrum of effects (including external and negative) generated by program activities; assessment of the social and economic effects of government programs as additional benefits of the national economy, its individual sectors and spheres, the population in comparison with the so-called «status quo» scenario. During the transition period, it is proposed to use a number of analytical procedures to assess the effects of government programs of the Russian Federation based on the available information and currently adopted methods for their development and effectiveness assessment (on the example of several government programs).


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 175-197
Author(s):  
Natalia Cwicinskaja

On March 18 2014, the Republic of Crimea became a federal subject of the Russian Federation and the Ukrainian legal system was changed to the Russian system. The transition period was set to end on January 1 2015. This transition period was characterized by the fact that the law was created on a day-to-day basis, and as the residents of Crimea were unfamiliar with Russian law they found themselves in a legal vacuum. Laws were adopted in an urgent manner to ensure that the unification was as smooth as possible. In practice it became apparent that the allocated time was not sufficient, and the transition period was extended in some areas. The Article presents a review of the accession procedure and the legal regulations established in the Republic of Crimea during the transition period, and identifies some issues which have arisen.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ксения Евгениевна Добрынина

В данной статье рассмотрены изменения законодательства Российской Федерации в сфере строительства жилья, выделены проблемные аспекты долевого строительства жилья и его поэтапной замены на проектное финансирование. В ходе анализа были выявлены позитивные и негативные последствия внедрения в России проектного финансирования строительства жилья. А так же сделаны выводы о том, к чему могут привести рассматриваемые изменения в законодательстве.This article examines the changes in the legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of housing construction, highlights the problematic aspects of shared housing construction and its phased replacement for project financing. The analysis revealed the positive and negative consequences of introducing project financing of housing construction in Russia. As well as conclusions about what the changes in the legislation in question may lead to.


2013 ◽  
pp. 109-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Kosareva ◽  
T. Polidi ◽  
A. Puzanov

The authors analyze peculiarities of the housing construction market in modern Russia, incentives of actors in such markets. The efficiency of the existing state regulation is being assessed. The authors conclude that housing constructionsector is characterized by serious deficiencies and ineffective regulation. The key parameters of the housing construction market do not meet the needs of the economy and the Russian society.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 03041
Author(s):  
Lyubov Gnedina ◽  
Arina Muchkina ◽  
Alexander Labutin

This article consider the use of polystyrene concrete blocks during assembling enclosing structure of ventilated facades in high-rise monolithic housing construction. Comparing with traditional technology devices hinged ventilated facade the main advantage of the proposed design is an exception of using scaffold, that leads to a cheapening of the enclosing structure. Proposed solutions are confirmed by patents of the Russian Federation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 296 ◽  
pp. 03010
Author(s):  
Aleksey Pestryakov ◽  
Nadezhda Sbrodova ◽  
Alisa Titovets ◽  
Polina Pysova

Within the framework of achieving several sustainable development goals, the construction of high-quality and affordable housing for citizens is considered. According to the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation “On national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030”, it is necessary to increase the volume of housing construction to at least 120 million square meters per year. The construction of standard-class housing contributes to the achievement of these goals. The article uses regression analysis to determine the main factors affecting the construction of standard-class housing in the city of Yekaterinburg. The problems and prospects for the development of housing construction at the expense of the standard-class segment are also identified.


2021 ◽  
Vol 282 ◽  
pp. 01004
Author(s):  
Asat Abdullin ◽  
Rashit Vafin ◽  
Irina Turgel ◽  
Natalia Khoroshkevich

The article is devoted to the study of normative and legal support problems of modern state food policy affecting the food security provision as one of the main components of the economic and national security of modern Russia. Evolution of the legal “food security” concept definition of the Russian Federation in domestic legislation. The current challenges of food security of the country related to both external and internal factors, including those caused by the COVID pandemic — 19 were considered. Supporting the approach of S.Yu. Glazyev on basic models of ensuring food security, considering the economy’s modern digital transformation and in particular the agro-industrial complex, authors suggest that we are in a transition period from an existing dynamic model to a new future innovation model for food security. Based on the studied and generalized scientific material, substantiate the conclusion that the most promising directions of food security is the use of innovative digital technologies in the agro-industrial complex of the country. It is noted that the existing normative and legal framework in modern conditions requires further development, and for this it is necessary to adopt a comprehensive Federal Law “On food security in the Russian Federation.” In it, the consolidation of the strategic goal “social and economic development of the country to improve the quality of Russian citizens’ life” by applying innovative technologies in the AIC would be set.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document