Naloxone in Correctional Facilities for the Prevention of Opioid Overdose Deaths

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Correctional Facilities ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Overdose Deaths

A Thematic Analysis of Overdose Prevention and Response Efforts in States Experiencing Declines in Rates of Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths

2021 ◽  
pp. 003335492110268
Author(s):  
Amber B. Robinson ◽  
Nida Ali ◽  
Olga Costa ◽  
Cherie Rooks-Peck ◽  
Amy Sorensen-Alawad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Prevention Program ◽  
Data Access ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Overdose Prevention ◽  
Core Elements ◽  
Specific Activities ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
Overdose Deaths

Objective To address the opioid overdose epidemic, it is important to understand the broad scope of efforts under way in states, particularly states in which the rate of opioid-involved overdose deaths is declining. The primary objective of this study was to examine core elements of overdose prevention activities in 4 states with a high rate of opioid-involved overdose deaths that experienced a decrease in opioid-involved overdose deaths from 2016 to 2017. Methods We identified 5 states experiencing decreases in age-adjusted mortality rates for opioid-involved overdoses from 2016 to 2017 and examined their overdose prevention programs via program narratives developed with collaborators from each state’s overdose prevention program. These program narratives used 10 predetermined categories to organize activities: legislative policies; strategic planning; data access, capacity, and dissemination; capacity building; public-facing resources (eg, web-based dashboards); training resources; enhancements and improvements to prescription drug monitoring programs; linkage to care; treatment; and community-focused initiatives. Using qualitative thematic analysis techniques, core elements and context-specific activities emerged. Results In the predetermined categories of programmatic activities, we identified the following core elements of overdose prevention and response: comprehensive state policies; strategic planning; local engagement; data access, capacity, and dissemination; training of professional audiences (eg, prescribers); treatment infrastructure; and harm reduction. Conclusions The identification of core elements and context-specific activities underscores the importance of implementation and adaptation of evidence-based prevention strategies, interdisciplinary partnerships, and collaborations to address opioid overdose. Further evaluation of these state programs and other overdose prevention efforts in states where mortality rates for opioid-involved overdoses declined should focus on impact, optimal timing, and combinations of program activities during the life span of an overdose prevention program.

Championing Change to Save Lives: A Call to Action to Implement Reforms to Increase Use of Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder in Correctional Settings

2020 ◽  
pp. 073401682098162
Author(s):  
Sonia L. Canzater ◽  
Regina M. LaBelle
Keyword(s):  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Correctional Facilities ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Correctional Settings ◽  
Overdose Deaths

The disproportional rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) in U.S. correctional facilities make them prime intervention points to treat OUD utilizing medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), the evidence-based clinical standard of care. MOUD has been shown to be effective to support recovery and reduce recurrence of OUD, overdose deaths, and recidivism for justice-involved persons both while incarcerated and once they reenter their communities. Despite the high prevalence, most jails and prisons do not offer MOUD. Litigation has spurred expanded access in more facilities, but widespread MOUD access can only become a reality through a comprehensive effort of corrections officials, medical experts, advocates, legislators, and other champions to raise awareness and affect ideological and policy change. It is a legal and ethical imperative that the lives of justice-involved persons not be jeopardized by the lack of evidence-based treatment for OUD in correctional settings.

scholarly journals Use of Opioid Overdose Deaths Reported in One State’s Criminal Justice, Hospital, and Prescription Databases to Identify Risk of Opioid Fatalities

2019 ◽  
Vol 179 (7) ◽  
pp. 980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Eisenberg ◽  
Brendan Saloner ◽  
Noa Krawczyk ◽  
Lindsey Ferris ◽  
Kristin E. Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Overdose Deaths ◽  
Prescription Databases

Intranasal naloxone administration by police first responders is associated with decreased opioid overdose deaths

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1201-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Rando ◽  
Derek Broering ◽  
James E. Olson ◽  
Catherine Marco ◽  
Stephen B. Evans
Keyword(s):  
First Responders ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Naloxone Administration ◽  
Overdose Deaths

Preparing pharmacists to increase naloxone dispensing within community pharmacies under the Pennsylvania standing order

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M Santa ◽  
Samira G Amirova ◽  
Daniel J Ventricelli ◽  
George E Downs ◽  
Alexandra A Nowalk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Pharmacists ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Community Pharmacies ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Patient Counseling ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Overdose Prevention ◽  
Standing Order ◽  
Overdose Deaths

Abstract Purpose Opioid misuse and overdose deaths remain a public health concern in the United States. Pennsylvania has one of the highest rates of opioid overdose deaths in the country, with Philadelphia County’s being 3 times higher than the national average. Despite several multimodal interventions, including use of SBIRT (screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment) methods and naloxone distribution, the rate of overdose deaths remains high. Methods To gain insights on strategies for improving access to naloxone and naloxone distribution by pharmacists in Philadelphia County, a study was conducted in 11 community pharmacies (chain and independent) in Philadelphia. Twenty-four pharmacists were recruited and completed SBIRT and naloxone trainings. Each pharmacy elected to have at least 1 pharmacy champion who received additional training on and helped develop pharmacy site–specific naloxone dispensing protocols. Results Pre-post survey results showed a reduction in stigmatizing attitudes regarding naloxone dispensing and an increase in pharmacists’ understanding of the standing order and appropriate naloxone use. There was an increase in pharmacists’ self-reported confidence in their ability to appropriately identify, discuss, and dispense naloxone to patients. All pharmacies increased their average monthly dispensing rate following protocol implementation. Conclusion Pharmacists who received both trainings were more likely to change naloxone dispensing practices, leading to an overall increase in naloxone dispensing by community pharmacists. The study addressed overall gaps in pharmacists’ knowledge, reduced stigma, and prepared pharmacists to address opioid use and overdose prevention with their patients. The described pharmacist-led patient counseling and intervention service for overdose prevention may be explored as a model for other community pharmacies to adopt to improve naloxone dispensing and similar interventions to reduce overdose deaths.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document