scholarly journals Cooperative Inhibition of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling by Smurf1 and Inhibitory Smads

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 2809-2817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gyo Murakami ◽  
Tetsuro Watabe ◽  
Kunio Takaoka ◽  
Kohei Miyazono ◽  
Takeshi Imamura

Smad ubiquitin regulatory factor (Smurf) 1 binds to receptor-regulated Smads for bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) Smad1/5 and promotes their degradation. In addition, Smurf1 associates with transforming growth factor-β type I receptor through the inhibitory Smad (I-Smad) Smad7 and induces their degradation. Herein, we examined whether Smurf1 negatively regulates BMP signaling together with the I-Smads Smad6/7. Smurf1 and Smad6 cooperatively induced secondary axes in Xenopus embryos. Using a BMP-responsive promoter-reporter construct in mammalian cells, we found that Smurf1 cooperated with I-Smad in inhibiting BMP signaling and that the inhibitory activity of Smurf1 was not necessarily correlated with its ability to bind to Smad1/5 directly. Smurf1 bound to BMP type I receptors via I-Smads and induced ubiquitination and degradation of these receptors. Moreover, Smurf1 associated with Smad1/5 indirectly through I-Smads and induced their ubiquitination and degradation. Smurf1 thus controls BMP signaling with and without I-Smads through multiple mechanisms.

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Lowery ◽  
Brice Brookshire ◽  
Vicki Rosen

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) constitute the largest subdivision of the TGF-βfamily of ligands and are unequivocally involved in regulating stem cell behavior. Appropriate regulation of canonical BMP signaling is critical for the development and homeostasis of numerous human organ systems, as aberrations in the BMP pathway or its regulation are increasingly associated with diverse human pathologies. In this review, we provide a wide-perspective on strategies that increase or decrease BMP signaling. We briefly outline the current FDA-approved approaches, highlight emerging next-generation technologies, and postulate prospective avenues for future investigation. We also detail how activating other pathways may indirectly modulate BMP signaling, with a particular emphasis on the relationship between the BMP and Activin/TGF-βpathways.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (50) ◽  
pp. 13206-13211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenqing Li ◽  
Weini Li ◽  
Lihui Zou ◽  
Shanming Ji ◽  
Chaoyi Li ◽  
...  

TGF-β/BMP (bone morphogenetic protein) signaling pathways play conserved roles in controlling embryonic development, tissue homeostasis, and stem cell regulation. Inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) have been shown to negatively regulate TGF-β/BMP signaling by primarily targeting the type I receptors for ubiquitination and turnover. However, little is known about how I-Smads access the membrane to execute their functions. Here we show that Dad, the Drosophila I-Smad, associates with the cellular membrane via palmitoylation, thereby targeting the BMP type I receptor for ubiquitination. By performing systematic biochemistry assays, we characterized the specific cysteine (Cys556) essential for Dad palmitoylation and membrane association. Moreover, we demonstrate that dHIP14, a Drosophila palmitoyl acyl-transferase, catalyzes Dad palmitoylation, thereby inhibiting efficient BMP signaling. Thus, our findings uncover a modification of the inhibitory Smads that controls TGF-β/BMP signaling activity.


2001 ◽  
Vol 155 (6) ◽  
pp. 1017-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aki Hanyu ◽  
Yasuhiro Ishidou ◽  
Takanori Ebisawa ◽  
Tomomasa Shimanuki ◽  
Takeshi Imamura ◽  
...  

Inhibitory Smads (I-Smads) repress signaling by cytokines of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily. I-Smads have conserved carboxy-terminal Mad homology 2 (MH2) domains, whereas the amino acid sequences of their amino-terminal regions (N domains) are highly divergent from those of other Smads. Of the two different I-Smads in mammals, Smad7 inhibited signaling by both TGF-β and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), whereas Smad6 was less effective in inhibiting TGF-β signaling. Analyses using deletion mutants and chimeras of Smad6 and Smad7 revealed that the MH2 domains were responsible for the inhibition of both TGF-β and BMP signaling by I-Smads, but the isolated MH2 domains of Smad6 and Smad7 were less potent than the full-length Smad7 in inhibiting TGF-β signaling. The N domains of I-Smads determined the subcellular localization of these molecules. Chimeras containing the N domain of Smad7 interacted with the TGF-β type I receptor (TβR-I) more efficiently, and were more potent in repressing TGF-β signaling, than those containing the N domain of Smad6. The isolated N domain of Smad7 physically interacted with the MH2 domain of Smad7, and enhanced the inhibitory activity of the latter through facilitating interaction with TGF-β receptors. The N domain of Smad7 thus plays an important role in the specific inhibition of TGF-β signaling.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (36) ◽  
pp. e2104661118
Author(s):  
Hyung-Seok Kim ◽  
Yangsook Song Green ◽  
Yuanyuan Xie ◽  
Jan L. Christian

Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr) interactor with leucine-rich repeats (Tril) functions as a Tlr coreceptor to mediate innate immunity in adults. In Xenopus embryos, Tril triggers degradation of the transforming growth factor β (Tgf-ß) family inhibitor, Smad7. This enhances bone morphogenetic protein (Bmp) signaling to enable ventral mesoderm to commit to a blood fate. Here, we show that Tril simultaneously dampens Nodal signaling by catalytically activating the ubiquitin ligase NEDD4 Like (Nedd4l). Nedd4l then targets Nodal receptors for degradation. How Tril signals are transduced in a nonimmune context is unknown. We identify the ubiquitin ligase Pellino2 as a protein that binds to the cytoplasmic tail of Tril and subsequently forms a complex with Nedd4l and another E3 ligase, TNF-receptor associated factor 6 (Traf6). Pellino2 and Traf6 are essential for catalytic activation of Nedd4l, both in Xenopus and in mammalian cells. Traf6 ubiquitinates Nedd4l, which is then recruited to membrane compartments where activation occurs. Collectively, our findings reveal that Tril initiates a noncanonical Tlr-like signaling cascade to activate Nedd4l, thereby coordinately regulating the Bmp and Nodal arms of the Tgf-ß superfamily during vertebrate development.


2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 963-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masafumi Takeda ◽  
Masafumi Mizuide ◽  
Masako Oka ◽  
Tetsuro Watabe ◽  
Hirofumi Inoue ◽  
...  

c-Ski is a transcriptional corepressor that interacts strongly with Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4 but only weakly with Smad1 and Smad5. Through binding to Smad proteins, c-Ski suppresses signaling of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) as well as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). In the present study, we found that a mutant of c-Ski, termed c-Ski (ARPG) inhibited TGF-β/activin signaling but not BMP signaling. Selectivity was confirmed in luciferase reporter assays and by determination of cellular responses in mammalian cells (BMP-induced osteoblastic differentiation of C2C12 cells and TGF-β–induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transdifferentiation of NMuMG cells) and Xenopus embryos. The ARPG mutant recruited histone deacetylases 1 (HDAC1) to the Smad3-Smad4 complex but not to the Smad1/5-Smad4 complex. c-Ski (ARPG) was unable to interact with Smad4, and the selective loss of suppression of BMP signaling by c-Ski (ARPG) was attributed to the lack of Smad4 binding. We also found that c-Ski interacted with Smad3 or Smad4 without disrupting Smad3-Smad4 heteromer formation. c-Ski (ARPG) would be useful for selectively suppressing TGF-β/activin signaling.


2010 ◽  
Vol 429 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Rider ◽  
Barbara Mulloy

The BMPs (bone morphogenetic proteins) and the GDFs (growth and differentiation factors) together form a single family of cystine-knot cytokines, sharing the characteristic fold of the TGFβ (transforming growth factor-β) superfamily. Besides the ability to induce bone formation, which gave the BMPs their name, the BMP/GDFs display morphogenetic activities in the development of a wide range of tissues. BMP/GDF homo- and hetero-dimers interact with combinations of type I and type II receptor dimers to produce multiple possible signalling complexes, leading to the activation of one of two competing sets of SMAD transcription factors. BMP/GDFs have highly specific and localized functions. These are regulated in a number of ways, including the developmental restriction of BMP/GDF expression and through the secretion of several specific BMP antagonist proteins that bind with high affinity to the cytokines. Curiously, a number of these antagonists are also members of the TGF-β superfamily. Finally a number of both the BMP/GDFs and their antagonists interact with the heparan sulphate side chains of cell-surface and extracellular-matrix proteoglycans.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document