scholarly journals Efficient Interaction between Two GTPases Allows the Chloroplast SRP Pathway to Bypass the Requirement for an SRP RNA

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2636-2645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peera Jaru-Ampornpan ◽  
Sowmya Chandrasekar ◽  
Shu-ou Shan
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
The Other ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Binding Partner ◽  
Biochemical Analyses ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Srp Rna

Cotranslational protein targeting to membranes is regulated by two GTPases in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor; association between the two GTPases is slow and is accelerated 400-fold by the SRP RNA. Intriguingly, the otherwise universally conserved SRP RNA is missing in a novel chloroplast SRP pathway. We found that even in the absence of an SRP RNA, the chloroplast SRP and receptor GTPases can interact efficiently with one another; the kinetics of interaction between the chloroplast GTPases is 400-fold faster than their bacterial homologues, and matches the rate at which the bacterial SRP and receptor interact with the help of SRP RNA. Biochemical analyses further suggest that the chloroplast SRP receptor is pre-organized in a conformation that allows optimal interaction with its binding partner, so that conformational changes during complex formation are minimized. Our results highlight intriguing differences between the classical and chloroplast SRP and SRP receptor GTPases, and help explain how the chloroplast SRP pathway can mediate efficient targeting of proteins to the thylakoid membrane in the absence of the SRP RNA, which plays an indispensable role in all the other SRP pathways.

scholarly journals The Signal Recognition Particle (SRP) RNA Links Conformational Changes in the SRP to Protein Targeting

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2728-2734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Bradshaw ◽  
Peter Walter
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Srp Rna ◽  
Binding Subunit

The RNA component of the signal recognition particle (SRP) is universally required for cotranslational protein targeting. Biochemical studies have shown that SRP RNA participates in the central step of protein targeting by catalyzing the interaction of the SRP with the SRP receptor (SR). SRP RNA also accelerates GTP hydrolysis in the SRP·SR complex once formed. Using a reverse-genetic and biochemical analysis, we identified mutations in the E. coli SRP protein, Ffh, that abrogate the activity of the SRP RNA and cause corresponding targeting defects in vivo. The mutations in Ffh that disrupt SRP RNA activity map to regions that undergo dramatic conformational changes during the targeting reaction, suggesting that the activity of the SRP RNA is linked to the major conformational changes in the signal sequence-binding subunit of the SRP. In this way, the SRP RNA may coordinate the interaction of the SRP and the SR with ribosome recruitment and transfer to the translocon, explaining why the SRP RNA is an indispensable component of the protein targeting machinery.

SRP RNA Remodeling by SRP68 Explains Its Role in Protein Translocation

Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 344 (6179) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Timo Grotwinkel ◽  
Klemens Wild ◽  
Bernd Segnitz ◽  
Irmgard Sinning
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Rna Remodeling ◽  
Srp Rna ◽  
Arginine Rich Motif

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is central to membrane protein targeting; SRP RNA is essential for SRP assembly, elongation arrest, and activation of SRP guanosine triphosphatases. In eukaryotes, SRP function relies on the SRP68-SRP72 heterodimer. We present the crystal structures of the RNA-binding domain of SRP68 (SRP68-RBD) alone and in complex with SRP RNA and SRP19. SRP68-RBD is a tetratricopeptide-like module that binds to a RNA three-way junction, bends the RNA, and inserts an α-helical arginine-rich motif (ARM) into the major groove. The ARM opens the conserved 5f RNA loop, which in ribosome-bound SRP establishes a contact to ribosomal RNA. Our data provide the structural basis for eukaryote-specific, SRP68-driven RNA remodeling required for protein translocation.

scholarly journals Ribosome–SRP–FtsY cotranslational targeting complex in the closed state

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (13) ◽  
pp. 3943-3948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ottilie von Loeffelholz ◽  
Qiyang Jiang ◽  
Aileen Ariosa ◽  
Manikandan Karuppasamy ◽  
Karine Huard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
Van Der Waals Interactions ◽  
Closed State ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Srp Rna

The signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway is essential for correct targeting of proteins to the membrane and subsequent insertion in the membrane or secretion. In Escherichia coli, the SRP and its receptor FtsY bind to ribosome–nascent chain complexes with signal sequences and undergo a series of distinct conformational changes, which ensures accurate timing and fidelity of protein targeting. Initial recruitment of the SRP receptor FtsY to the SRP–RNC complex results in GTP-independent binding of the SRP–FtsY GTPases at the SRP RNA tetraloop. In the presence of GTP, a closed state is adopted by the SRP–FtsY complex. The cryo-EM structure of the closed state reveals an ordered SRP RNA and SRP M domain with a signal sequence-bound. Van der Waals interactions between the finger loop and ribosomal protein L24 lead to a constricted signal sequence-binding pocket possibly preventing premature release of the signal sequence. Conserved M-domain residues contact ribosomal RNA helices 24 and 59. The SRP–FtsY GTPases are detached from the RNA tetraloop and flexible, thus liberating the ribosomal exit site for binding of the translocation machinery.

scholarly journals Structure, dynamics and interactions of large SRP variants

2019 ◽  
Vol 401 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemens Wild ◽  
Matthias M.M. Becker ◽  
Georg Kempf ◽  
Irmgard Sinning
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Domain Architecture ◽  
Particle Dynamics ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Signal Anchor ◽  
Srp Rna

Abstract Co-translational protein targeting to membranes relies on the signal recognition particle (SRP) system consisting of a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein complex and its membrane-associated receptor. SRP recognizes N-terminal cleavable signals or signal anchor sequences, retards translation, and delivers ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) to vacant translocation channels in the target membrane. While our mechanistic understanding is well advanced for the small bacterial systems it lags behind for the large bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic SRP variants including an Alu and an S domain. Here we describe recent advances on structural and functional insights in domain architecture, particle dynamics and interplay with RNCs and translocon and GTP-dependent regulation of co-translational protein targeting stimulated by SRP RNA.

scholarly journals Conformational changes in the GTPase modules of the signal reception particle and its receptor drive initiation of protein translocation

2007 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 611-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-ou Shan ◽  
Sowmya Chandrasekar ◽  
Peter Walter
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Translocation Efficiency ◽  
Cargo Proteins ◽  
Gtpase Activation ◽  
Guanosine Triphosphatase

During cotranslational protein targeting, two guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) form a unique complex in which hydrolyses of both guanosine triphosphates (GTP) are activated in a shared active site. It was thought that GTP hydrolysis drives the recycling of SRP and SR, but is not crucial for protein targeting. Here, we examined the translocation efficiency of mutant GTPases that block the interaction between SRP and SR at specific stages. Surprisingly, mutants that allow SRP–SR complex assembly but block GTPase activation severely compromise protein translocation. These mutations map to the highly conserved insertion box domain loops that rearrange upon complex formation to form multiple catalytic interactions with the two GTPs. Thus, although GTP hydrolysis is not required, the molecular rearrangements that lead to GTPase activation are essential for protein targeting. Most importantly, our results show that an elaborate rearrangement within the SRP–SR GTPase complex is required to drive the unloading and initiate translocation of cargo proteins.

scholarly journals A Distinct Mechanism to Achieve Efficient Signal Recognition Particle (SRP)–SRP Receptor Interaction by the Chloroplast SRP Pathway

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 3965-3973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peera Jaru-Ampornpan ◽  
Thang X. Nguyen ◽  
Shu-ou Shan
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Receptor Interaction ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Gtpase Domain ◽  
Distinct Mechanism ◽  
Molecular Origin ◽  
Srp Rna

Cotranslational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) requires the SRP RNA, which accelerates the interaction between the SRP and SRP receptor 200-fold. This otherwise universally conserved SRP RNA is missing in the chloroplast SRP (cpSRP) pathway. Instead, the cpSRP and cpSRP receptor (cpFtsY) by themselves can interact 200-fold faster than their bacterial homologues. Here, cross-complementation analyses revealed the molecular origin underlying their efficient interaction. We found that cpFtsY is 5- to 10-fold more efficient than Escherichia coli FtsY at interacting with the GTPase domain of SRP from both chloroplast and bacteria, suggesting that cpFtsY is preorganized into a conformation more conducive to complex formation. Furthermore, the cargo-binding M-domain of cpSRP provides an additional 100-fold acceleration for the interaction between the chloroplast GTPases, functionally mimicking the effect of the SRP RNA in the cotranslational targeting pathway. The stimulatory effect of the SRP RNA or the M-domain of cpSRP is specific to the homologous SRP receptor in each pathway. These results strongly suggest that the M-domain of SRP actively communicates with the SRP and SR GTPases and that the cytosolic and chloroplast SRP pathways have evolved distinct molecular mechanisms (RNA vs. protein) to mediate this communication.

scholarly journals Signal sequence–independent SRP-SR complex formation at the membrane suggests an alternative targeting pathway within the SRP cycle

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (13) ◽  
pp. 2309-2323 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Braig ◽  
Miryana Mircheva ◽  
Ilie Sachelaru ◽  
Eli O. van der Sluis ◽  
Lukas Sturm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Substrate Recognition ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Influence Of Substrate

Protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the bacterial SRP receptor FtsY requires a series of closely coordinated steps that monitor the presence of a substrate, the membrane, and a vacant translocon. Although the influence of substrate binding on FtsY-SRP complex formation is well documented, the contribution of the membrane is largely unknown. In the current study, we found that negatively charged phospholipids stimulate FtsY-SRP complex formation. Phospholipids act on a conserved positively charged amphipathic helix in FtsY and induce a conformational change that strongly enhances the FtsY-lipid interaction. This membrane-bound, signal sequence–independent FtsY-SRP complex is able to recruit RNCs to the membrane and to transfer them to the Sec translocon. Significantly, the same results were also observed with an artificial FtsY-SRP fusion protein, which was tethered to the membrane via a transmembrane domain. This indicates that substrate recognition by a soluble SRP is not essential for cotranslational targeting in Escherichia coli. Our findings reveal a remarkable flexibility of SRP-dependent protein targeting, as they indicate that substrate recognition can occur either in the cytosol via ribosome-bound SRP or at the membrane via a preassembled FtsY-SRP complex.

scholarly journals Lipid activation of the signal recognition particle receptor provides spatial coordination of protein targeting

2010 ◽  
Vol 190 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinh Q. Lam ◽  
David Akopian ◽  
Michael Rome ◽  
Doug Henningsen ◽  
Shu-ou Shan
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Lipid Binding ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Complex Assembly ◽  
Spatial Coordination ◽  
Cargo Proteins ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Cellular Machinery

The signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP receptor comprise the major cellular machinery that mediates the cotranslational targeting of proteins to cellular membranes. It remains unclear how the delivery of cargos to the target membrane is spatially coordinated. We show here that phospholipid binding drives important conformational rearrangements that activate the bacterial SRP receptor FtsY and the SRP–FtsY complex. This leads to accelerated SRP–FtsY complex assembly, and allows the SRP–FtsY complex to more efficiently unload cargo proteins. Likewise, formation of an active SRP–FtsY GTPase complex exposes FtsY’s lipid-binding helix and enables stable membrane association of the targeting complex. Thus, membrane binding, complex assembly with SRP, and cargo unloading are inextricably linked to each other via conformational changes in FtsY. These allosteric communications allow the membrane delivery of cargo proteins to be efficiently coupled to their subsequent unloading and translocation, thus providing spatial coordination during protein targeting.

scholarly journals Autonomous translational pausing is required for XBP1u mRNA recruitment to the ER via the SRP pathway

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (40) ◽  
pp. E5886-E5895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Kanda ◽  
Kota Yanagitani ◽  
Yukiko Yokota ◽  
Yuta Esaki ◽  
Kenji Kohno
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Secretory Protein ◽  
Protein Accumulation ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Biochemical Analyses ◽  
Er Membrane

Unconventional mRNA splicing on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is the sole conserved mechanism in eukaryotes to transmit information regarding misfolded protein accumulation to the nucleus to activate the stress response. In metazoans, the unspliced form of X-box–binding protein 1 (XBP1u) mRNA is recruited to membranes as a ribosome nascent chain (RNC) complex for efficient splicing. We previously reported that both hydrophobic (HR2) and translational pausing regions of XBP1u are important for the recruitment of its own mRNA to membranes. However, its precise location and the molecular mechanism of translocation are unclear. We show that XBP1u-RNC is specifically recruited to the ER membrane in an HR2- and translational pausing-dependent manner by immunostaining, fluorescent recovery after photobleaching, and biochemical analyses. Notably, translational pausing during XBP1u synthesis is indispensable for the recognition of HR2 by the signal recognition particle (SRP), resulting in efficient ER-specific targeting of the complex, similar to secretory protein targeting to the ER. On the ER, the XBP1u nascent chain is transferred from the SRP to the translocon; however, it cannot pass through the translocon or insert into the membrane. Therefore, our results support a noncanonical mechanism by which mRNA substrates are recruited to the ER for unconventional splicing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document