SRP RNA Remodeling by SRP68 Explains Its Role in Protein Translocation

Science ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 344 (6179) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Timo Grotwinkel ◽  
Klemens Wild ◽  
Bernd Segnitz ◽  
Irmgard Sinning
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Rna Remodeling ◽  
Srp Rna ◽  
Arginine Rich Motif

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is central to membrane protein targeting; SRP RNA is essential for SRP assembly, elongation arrest, and activation of SRP guanosine triphosphatases. In eukaryotes, SRP function relies on the SRP68-SRP72 heterodimer. We present the crystal structures of the RNA-binding domain of SRP68 (SRP68-RBD) alone and in complex with SRP RNA and SRP19. SRP68-RBD is a tetratricopeptide-like module that binds to a RNA three-way junction, bends the RNA, and inserts an α-helical arginine-rich motif (ARM) into the major groove. The ARM opens the conserved 5f RNA loop, which in ribosome-bound SRP establishes a contact to ribosomal RNA. Our data provide the structural basis for eukaryote-specific, SRP68-driven RNA remodeling required for protein translocation.

scholarly journals In Vivo Analysis of an Essential Archaeal Signal Recognition Particle in Its Native Host

2002 ◽  
Vol 184 (12) ◽  
pp. 3260-3267 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wesley Rose ◽  
Mechthild Pohlschröder
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Sequence Comparisons ◽  
Protein Insertion ◽  
Native Host

ABSTRACT The evolutionarily conserved signal recognition particle (SRP) plays an integral role in Sec-mediated cotranslational protein translocation and membrane protein insertion, as it has been shown to target nascent secretory and membrane proteins to the bacterial and eukaryotic translocation pores. However, little is known about its function in archaea, since characterization of the SRP in this domain of life has thus far been limited to in vitro reconstitution studies of heterologously expressed archaeal SRP components identified by sequence comparisons. In the present study, the genes encoding the SRP54, SRP19, and 7S RNA homologs (hv54h, hv19h, and hv7Sh, respectively) of the genetically and biochemically tractable archaeon Haloferax volcanii were cloned, providing the tools to analyze the SRP in its native host. As part of this analysis, an hv54h knockout strain was created. In vivo characterization of this strain revealed that the archaeal SRP is required for viability, suggesting that cotranslational protein translocation is an essential process in archaea. Furthermore, a method for the purification of this SRP employing nickel chromatography was developed in H. volcanii, allowing the successful copurification of (i) Hv7Sh with a histidine-tagged Hv54h, as well as (ii) Hv54h and Hv7Sh with a histidine-tagged Hv19h. These results provide the first in vivo evidence that these components interact in archaea. Such copurification studies will provide insight into the significance of the similarities and differences of the protein-targeting systems of the three domains of life, thereby increasing knowledge about the recognition of translocated proteins in general.

scholarly journals Structure, dynamics and interactions of large SRP variants

2019 ◽  
Vol 401 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klemens Wild ◽  
Matthias M.M. Becker ◽  
Georg Kempf ◽  
Irmgard Sinning
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Domain Architecture ◽  
Particle Dynamics ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Target Membrane ◽  
Signal Anchor ◽  
Srp Rna

Abstract Co-translational protein targeting to membranes relies on the signal recognition particle (SRP) system consisting of a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein complex and its membrane-associated receptor. SRP recognizes N-terminal cleavable signals or signal anchor sequences, retards translation, and delivers ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) to vacant translocation channels in the target membrane. While our mechanistic understanding is well advanced for the small bacterial systems it lags behind for the large bacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic SRP variants including an Alu and an S domain. Here we describe recent advances on structural and functional insights in domain architecture, particle dynamics and interplay with RNCs and translocon and GTP-dependent regulation of co-translational protein targeting stimulated by SRP RNA.

scholarly journals Conformational changes in the GTPase modules of the signal reception particle and its receptor drive initiation of protein translocation

2007 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 611-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-ou Shan ◽  
Sowmya Chandrasekar ◽  
Peter Walter
Keyword(s):  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Gtp Hydrolysis ◽  
Translocation Efficiency ◽  
Cargo Proteins ◽  
Gtpase Activation ◽  
Guanosine Triphosphatase

During cotranslational protein targeting, two guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor (SR) form a unique complex in which hydrolyses of both guanosine triphosphates (GTP) are activated in a shared active site. It was thought that GTP hydrolysis drives the recycling of SRP and SR, but is not crucial for protein targeting. Here, we examined the translocation efficiency of mutant GTPases that block the interaction between SRP and SR at specific stages. Surprisingly, mutants that allow SRP–SR complex assembly but block GTPase activation severely compromise protein translocation. These mutations map to the highly conserved insertion box domain loops that rearrange upon complex formation to form multiple catalytic interactions with the two GTPs. Thus, although GTP hydrolysis is not required, the molecular rearrangements that lead to GTPase activation are essential for protein targeting. Most importantly, our results show that an elaborate rearrangement within the SRP–SR GTPase complex is required to drive the unloading and initiate translocation of cargo proteins.

scholarly journals Emerging View on the Molecular Functions of Sec62 and Sec63 in Protein Translocation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 12757
Author(s):  
Sung-jun Jung ◽  
Hyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Conducting Channel ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Translocation Pathway ◽  
Molecular Functions ◽  
Sec61 Channel

Most secreted and membrane proteins are targeted to and translocated across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane through the Sec61 protein-conducting channel. Evolutionarily conserved Sec62 and Sec63 associate with the Sec61 channel, forming the Sec complex and mediating translocation of a subset of proteins. For the last three decades, it has been thought that ER protein targeting and translocation occur via two distinct pathways: signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent co-translational or SRP-independent, Sec62/Sec63 dependent post-translational translocation pathway. However, recent studies have suggested that ER protein targeting and translocation through the Sec translocon are more intricate than previously thought. This review summarizes the current understanding of the molecular functions of Sec62/Sec63 in ER protein translocation.

scholarly journals Receptor compaction and GTPase movements drive cotranslational protein translocation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Ho Lee ◽  
SangYoon Chung ◽  
Yu-Hsien Hwang Fu ◽  
Ruilin Qian ◽  
Xuemeng Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Biological Regulation ◽  
Single Molecule Fluorescence Spectroscopy ◽  
Cause Of Failure ◽  
Distal Site

AbstractSignal recognition particle (SRP) is a universally conserved targeting machine that couples the synthesis of ~30% of the proteome to their proper membrane localization1,2. In eukaryotic cells, SRP recognizes translating ribosomes bearing hydrophobic signal sequences and, through interaction with SRP receptor (SR), delivers them to the Sec61p translocase on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane1,2. How SRP ensures efficient and productive initiation of protein translocation at the ER is not well understood. Here, single molecule fluorescence spectroscopy demonstrates that cargo-loaded SRP induces a global compaction of SR, driving a >90 Å movement of the SRP•SR GTPase complex from the vicinity of the ribosome exit, where it initially assembles, to the distal site of SRP. These rearrangements bring translating ribosomes near the membrane, expose conserved Sec61p docking sites on the ribosome and weaken SRP’s interaction with the signal sequence on the nascent polypeptide, thus priming the translating ribosome for engaging the translocation machinery. Disruption of these rearrangements severely impairs cotranslational protein translocation and is the cause of failure in an SRP54 mutant linked to severe congenital neutropenia. Our results demonstrate that multiple largescale molecular motions in the SRP•SR complex are required to drive the transition from protein targeting to translocation; these post-targeting rearrangements provide potential new points for biological regulation as well as disease intervention.

scholarly journals A Distinct Mechanism to Achieve Efficient Signal Recognition Particle (SRP)–SRP Receptor Interaction by the Chloroplast SRP Pathway

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 3965-3973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peera Jaru-Ampornpan ◽  
Thang X. Nguyen ◽  
Shu-ou Shan
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Receptor Interaction ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Gtpase Domain ◽  
Distinct Mechanism ◽  
Molecular Origin ◽  
Srp Rna

Cotranslational protein targeting by the signal recognition particle (SRP) requires the SRP RNA, which accelerates the interaction between the SRP and SRP receptor 200-fold. This otherwise universally conserved SRP RNA is missing in the chloroplast SRP (cpSRP) pathway. Instead, the cpSRP and cpSRP receptor (cpFtsY) by themselves can interact 200-fold faster than their bacterial homologues. Here, cross-complementation analyses revealed the molecular origin underlying their efficient interaction. We found that cpFtsY is 5- to 10-fold more efficient than Escherichia coli FtsY at interacting with the GTPase domain of SRP from both chloroplast and bacteria, suggesting that cpFtsY is preorganized into a conformation more conducive to complex formation. Furthermore, the cargo-binding M-domain of cpSRP provides an additional 100-fold acceleration for the interaction between the chloroplast GTPases, functionally mimicking the effect of the SRP RNA in the cotranslational targeting pathway. The stimulatory effect of the SRP RNA or the M-domain of cpSRP is specific to the homologous SRP receptor in each pathway. These results strongly suggest that the M-domain of SRP actively communicates with the SRP and SR GTPases and that the cytosolic and chloroplast SRP pathways have evolved distinct molecular mechanisms (RNA vs. protein) to mediate this communication.

scholarly journals Getting on target: The archaeal signal recognition particle

Archaea ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Zwieb ◽  
Jerry Eichler
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Biochemical Analysis ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Polypeptide Chain ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Evolutionary Significance ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Functional Behavior ◽  
Translocation Pathway

Protein translocation begins with the efficient targeting of secreted and membrane proteins to complexes embedded within the membrane. In Eukarya and Bacteria, this is achieved through the interaction of the signal recognition particle (SRP) with the nascent polypeptide chain. In Archaea, homologs of eukaryal and bacterial SRP-mediated translocation pathway components have been identified. Biochemical analysis has revealed that although the archaeal system incorporates various facets of the eukaryal and bacterial targeting systems, numerous aspects of the archaeal system are unique to this domain of life. Moreover, it is becoming increasingly clear that elucidation of the archaeal SRP pathway will provide answers to basic questions about protein targeting that cannot be obtained from examination of eukaryal or bacterial models. In this review, recent data regarding the molecular composition, functional behavior and evolutionary significance of the archaeal signal recognition particle pathway are discussed.

scholarly journals Efficient Interaction between Two GTPases Allows the Chloroplast SRP Pathway to Bypass the Requirement for an SRP RNA

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2636-2645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peera Jaru-Ampornpan ◽  
Sowmya Chandrasekar ◽  
Shu-ou Shan
Keyword(s):  
Complex Formation ◽  
Conformational Changes ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
The Other ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Binding Partner ◽  
Biochemical Analyses ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Srp Rna

Cotranslational protein targeting to membranes is regulated by two GTPases in the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor; association between the two GTPases is slow and is accelerated 400-fold by the SRP RNA. Intriguingly, the otherwise universally conserved SRP RNA is missing in a novel chloroplast SRP pathway. We found that even in the absence of an SRP RNA, the chloroplast SRP and receptor GTPases can interact efficiently with one another; the kinetics of interaction between the chloroplast GTPases is 400-fold faster than their bacterial homologues, and matches the rate at which the bacterial SRP and receptor interact with the help of SRP RNA. Biochemical analyses further suggest that the chloroplast SRP receptor is pre-organized in a conformation that allows optimal interaction with its binding partner, so that conformational changes during complex formation are minimized. Our results highlight intriguing differences between the classical and chloroplast SRP and SRP receptor GTPases, and help explain how the chloroplast SRP pathway can mediate efficient targeting of proteins to the thylakoid membrane in the absence of the SRP RNA, which plays an indispensable role in all the other SRP pathways.

scholarly journals Dual recognition of the ribosome and the signal recognition particle by the SRP receptor during protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

2003 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabet C. Mandon ◽  
Ying Jiang ◽  
Reid Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Chain Complex ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Ribosomal Subunits ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Gtpase Cycle ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

We have analyzed the interactions between the signal recognition particle (SRP), the SRP receptor (SR), and the ribosome using GTPase assays, biosensor experiments, and ribosome binding assays. Possible mechanisms that could contribute to an enhanced affinity between the SR and the SRP–ribosome nascent chain complex to promote protein translocation under physiological ionic strength conditions have been explored. Ribosomes or 60S large ribosomal subunits activate the GTPase cycle of SRP54 and SRα by providing a platform for assembly of the SRP–SR complex. Biosensor experiments revealed high-affinity, saturable binding of ribosomes or large ribosomal subunits to the SR. Remarkably, the SR has a 100-fold higher affinity for the ribosome than for SRP. Proteoliposomes that contain the SR bind nontranslating ribosomes with an affinity comparable to that shown by the Sec61 complex. An NH2-terminal 319-residue segment of SRα is necessary and sufficient for binding of SR to the ribosome. We propose that the ribosome–SR interaction accelerates targeting of the ribosome nascent chain complex to the RER, while the SRP–SR interaction is crucial for maintaining the fidelity of the targeting reaction.

scholarly journals Lon Protease Removes Excess Signal Recognition Particle Protein in Escherichia coli

2020 ◽  
Vol 202 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beate Sauerbrei ◽  
Jan Arends ◽  
Danja Schünemann ◽  
Franz Narberhaus
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Membrane Integrity ◽  
Lon Protease ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Rna Complex ◽  
4.5S Rna

ABSTRACT Correct targeting of membrane proteins is essential for membrane integrity, cell physiology, and viability. Cotranslational targeting depends on the universally conserved signal recognition particle (SRP), which is a ribonucleoprotein complex comprised of the protein component Ffh and the 4.5S RNA in Escherichia coli. About 25 years ago it was reported that Ffh is an unstable protein, but the underlying mechanism has never been explored. Here, we show that Lon is the primary protease responsible for adjusting the cellular Ffh level. When overproduced, Ffh is particularly prone to degradation during transition from exponential to stationary growth and the cellular Ffh amount is lowest in stationary phase. The Ffh protein consists of two domains, the NG domain, responsible for GTP hydrolysis and docking to the membrane receptor FtsY, and the RNA-binding M domain. We find that the NG domain alone is stable, whereas the isolated M domain is degraded. Consistent with the importance of Lon in this process, the M domain confers synthetic lethality to the lon mutant. The Ffh homolog from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, which forms a protein-protein complex rather than a protein-RNA complex, is stable, suggesting that the RNA-binding ability residing in the M domain of E. coli Ffh is important for proteolysis. Our results support a model in which excess Ffh not bound to 4.5S RNA is subjected to proteolysis until an appropriate Ffh concentration is reached. The differential proteolysis adjusts Ffh levels to the cellular demand and maintains cotranslational protein transport and membrane integrity. IMPORTANCE Since one-third of all bacterial proteins reside outside the cytoplasm, protein targeting to the appropriate address is an essential process. Cotranslational targeting to the membrane relies on the signal recognition particle (SRP), which is a protein-RNA complex in bacteria. We report that the protein component Ffh is a substrate of the Lon protease. Regulated proteolysis of Ffh provides a simple mechanism to adjust the concentration of the essential protein to the cellular demand. This is important because elevated or depleted SRP levels negatively impact protein targeting and bacterial fitness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document