scholarly journals SNARE complexes of different composition jointly mediate membrane fusion in Arabidopsis cytokinesis

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1593-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farid El Kasmi ◽  
Cornelia Krause ◽  
Ulrike Hiller ◽  
York-Dieter Stierhof ◽  
Ulrike Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Membrane Vesicles ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
The Other ◽  
Division Plane ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Membrane Type ◽  
Cell Division Plane

Membrane fusion is mediated by soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes. Although membrane fusion is required for separating daughter cells in eukaryotic cytokinesis, the SNARE complexes involved are not known. In plants, membrane vesicles targeted to the cell division plane fuse with one another to form the partitioning membrane, progressing from the center to the periphery of the cell. In Arabidopsis, the cytokinesis-specific Qa-SNARE KNOLLE interacts with two other Q-SNAREs, SNAP33 and novel plant-specific SNARE 11 (NPSN11), whose roles in cytokinesis are not clear. Here we show by coimmunoprecipitation that KNOLLE forms two SNARE complexes that differ in composition. One complex is modeled on the trimeric plasma membrane type of SNARE complex and includes, in addition to KNOLLE, the promiscuous Qb,c-SNARE SNAP33 and the R-SNARE vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) 721,722, also involved in innate immunity. In contrast, the other KNOLLE-containing complex is tetrameric and includes Qb-SNARE NPSN11, Qc-SNARE SYP71, and VAMP721,722. Elimination of only one or the other type of KNOLLE complex by mutation, including the double mutant npsn11 syp71, causes a mild or no cytokinesis defect. In contrast, the two double mutants snap33 npsn11 and snap33 syp71 eliminate both types of KNOLLE complexes and display knolle-like cytokinesis defects. Thus the two distinct types of KNOLLE complexes appear to jointly mediate membrane fusion in Arabidopsis cytokinesis.

scholarly journals Localization, Dynamics, and Protein Interactions Reveal Distinct Roles for ER and Golgi SNAREs

1998 ◽  
Vol 141 (7) ◽  
pp. 1489-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse C. Hay ◽  
Judith Klumperman ◽  
Viola Oorschot ◽  
Martin Steegmaier ◽  
Christin S. Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Snare Proteins ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Golgi Transport ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Coated Membranes ◽  
Factor Attachment Protein Receptor

ER-to-Golgi transport, and perhaps intraGolgi transport involves a set of interacting soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins including syntaxin 5, GOS-28, membrin, rsec22b, and rbet1. By immunoelectron microscopy we find that rsec22b and rbet1 are enriched in COPII-coated vesicles that bud from the ER and presumably fuse with nearby vesicular tubular clusters (VTCs). However, all of the SNAREs were found on both COPII- and COPI-coated membranes, indicating that similar SNARE machinery directs both vesicle pathways. rsec22b and rbet1 do not appear beyond the first Golgi cisterna, whereas syntaxin 5 and membrin penetrate deeply into the Golgi stacks. Temperature shifts reveal that membrin, rsec22b, rbet1, and syntaxin 5 are present together on membranes that rapidly recycle between peripheral and Golgi-centric locations. GOS-28, on the other hand, maintains a fixed localization in the Golgi. By immunoprecipitation analysis, syntaxin 5 exists in at least two major subcomplexes: one containing syntaxin 5 (34-kD isoform) and GOS-28, and another containing syntaxin 5 (41- and 34-kD isoforms), membrin, rsec22b, and rbet1. Both subcomplexes appear to involve direct interactions of each SNARE with syntaxin 5. Our results indicate a central role for complexes among rbet1, rsec22b, membrin, and syntaxin 5 (34 and 41 kD) at two membrane fusion interfaces: the fusion of ER-derived vesicles with VTCs, and the assembly of VTCs to form cis-Golgi elements. The 34-kD syntaxin 5 isoform, membrin, and GOS-28 may function in intraGolgi transport.

scholarly journals Regulation of exocytosis by the exocyst subunit Sec6 and the SM protein Sec1

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Morgera ◽  
Margaret R. Sallah ◽  
Michelle L. Dubuke ◽  
Pallavi Gandhi ◽  
Daniel N. Brewer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Secretory Vesicle ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Sm Protein ◽  
Snare Complex Formation

Trafficking of protein and lipid cargo through the secretory pathway in eukaryotic cells is mediated by membrane-bound vesicles. Secretory vesicle targeting and fusion require a conserved multisubunit protein complex termed the exocyst, which has been implicated in specific tethering of vesicles to sites of polarized exocytosis. The exocyst is directly involved in regulating soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes and membrane fusion through interactions between the Sec6 subunit and the plasma membrane SNARE protein Sec9. Here we show another facet of Sec6 function—it directly binds Sec1, another SNARE regulator, but of the Sec1/Munc18 family. The Sec6–Sec1 interaction is exclusive of Sec6–Sec9 but compatible with Sec6–exocyst assembly. In contrast, the Sec6–exocyst interaction is incompatible with Sec6–Sec9. Therefore, upon vesicle arrival, Sec6 is proposed to release Sec9 in favor of Sec6–exocyst assembly and to simultaneously recruit Sec1 to sites of secretion for coordinated SNARE complex formation and membrane fusion.

scholarly journals A Novel Site of Action for α-SNAP in the SNARE Conformational Cycle Controlling Membrane Fusion

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 776-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Barszczewski ◽  
John J. Chua ◽  
Alexander Stein ◽  
Ulrike Winter ◽  
Rainer Heintzmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Plasma Membranes ◽  
Secretory Granules ◽  
Neuroendocrine Cells ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Site Of Action ◽  
Snare Motif ◽  
Liposome Fusion

Regulated exocytosis in neurons and neuroendocrine cells requires the formation of a stable soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex consisting of synaptobrevin-2/vesicle-associated membrane protein 2, synaptosome-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25), and syntaxin 1. This complex is subsequently disassembled by the concerted action of α-SNAP and the ATPases associated with different cellular activities-ATPase N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF). We report that NSF inhibition causes accumulation of α-SNAP in clusters on plasma membranes. Clustering is mediated by the binding of α-SNAP to uncomplexed syntaxin, because cleavage of syntaxin with botulinum neurotoxin C1 or competition by using antibodies against syntaxin SNARE motif abolishes clustering. Binding of α-SNAP potently inhibits Ca2+-dependent exocytosis of secretory granules and SNARE-mediated liposome fusion. Membrane clustering and inhibition of both exocytosis and liposome fusion are counteracted by NSF but not when an α-SNAP mutant defective in NSF activation is used. We conclude that α-SNAP inhibits exocytosis by binding to the syntaxin SNARE motif and in turn prevents SNARE assembly, revealing an unexpected site of action for α-SNAP in the SNARE cycle that drives exocytotic membrane fusion.

scholarly journals HOPS drives vacuole fusion by binding the vacuolar SNARE complex and the Vam7 PX domain via two distinct sites

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2601-2611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Krämer ◽  
Christian Ungermann
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Endomembrane System ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Vacuole Fusion ◽  
Px Domain ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Membrane Tethering

Membrane fusion within the endomembrane system follows a defined order of events: membrane tethering, mediated by Rabs and tethers, assembly of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complexes, and lipid bilayer mixing. Here we present evidence that the vacuolar HOPS tethering complex controls fusion through specific interactions with the vacuolar SNARE complex (consisting of Vam3, Vam7, Vti1, and Nyv1) and the N-terminal domains of Vam7 and Vam3. We show that homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS) binds Vam7 via its subunits Vps16 and Vps18. In addition, we observed that Vps16, Vps18, and the Sec1/Munc18 protein Vps33, which is also part of the HOPS complex, bind to the Q-SNARE complex. In agreement with this observation, HOPS-stimulated fusion was inhibited if HOPS was preincubated with the minimal Q-SNARE complex. Importantly, artificial targeting of Vam7 without its PX domain to membranes rescued vacuole morphology in vivo, but resulted in a cytokinesis defect if the N-terminal domain of Vam3 was also removed. Our data thus support a model of HOPS-controlled membrane fusion by recognizing different elements of the SNARE complex.

What is the role of SNARE proteins in membrane fusion?

2003 ◽  
Vol 285 (2) ◽  
pp. C237-C249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph G. Duman ◽  
John G. Forte
Keyword(s):  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Biological Membrane ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Snare Proteins ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Membrane Contact

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor (SNARE) proteins have been at the fore-front of research on biological membrane fusion for some time. The subcellular localization of SNAREs and their ability to form the so-called SNARE complex may be integral to determining the specificity of intracellular fusion (the SNARE hypothesis) and/or serving as the minimal fusion machinery. Both the SNARE hypothesis and the idea of the minimal fusion machinery have been challenged by a number of experimental observations in various model systems, suggesting that SNAREs may have other functions. Considering recent advances in the SNARE literature, it appears that SNAREs may actually function as part of a complex fusion “machine.” Their role in the machinery could be any one or a combination of roles, including establishing tight membrane contact, formation of a scaffolding on which to build the machine, binding of lipid surfaces, and many others. It is also possible that complexations other than the classic SNARE complex participate in membrane fusion.

scholarly journals SNARE phosphorylation: a control mechanism for insulin-stimulated glucose transport and other regulated exocytic events

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1271-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamilla M.E. Laidlaw ◽  
Rachel Livingstone ◽  
Mohammed Al-Tobi ◽  
Nia J. Bryant ◽  
Gwyn W. Gould
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Membrane Receptors ◽  
Multivesicular Bodies ◽  
Attachment Protein ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Plasma Membrane Receptors ◽  
Regulated Trafficking ◽  
Receptor Family

Trafficking within eukaryotic cells is a complex and highly regulated process; events such as recycling of plasma membrane receptors, formation of multivesicular bodies, regulated release of hormones and delivery of proteins to membranes all require directionality and specificity. The underpinning processes, including cargo selection, membrane fusion, trafficking flow and timing, are controlled by a variety of molecular mechanisms and engage multiple families of lipids and proteins. Here, we will focus on control of trafficking processes via the action of the SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) family of proteins, in particular their regulation by phosphorylation. We will describe how these proteins are controlled in a range of regulated trafficking events, with particular emphasis on the insulin-stimulated delivery of glucose transporters to the surface of adipose and muscle cells. Here, we focus on a few examples of SNARE phosphorylation which exemplify distinct ways in which SNARE machinery phosphorylation may regulate membrane fusion.

scholarly journals Syntaxin 16’s Newly Deciphered Roles in Autophagy

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bor Luen Tang
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Trafficking ◽  
Functional Redundancy ◽  
Transport Processes ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Dual Roles ◽  
Trans Golgi Network ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Golgi Network

Syntaxin 16, a Qa-SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor), is involved in a number of membrane-trafficking activities, particularly transport processes at the trans-Golgi network (TGN). Recent works have now implicated syntaxin 16 in the autophagy process. In fact, syntaxin 16 appears to have dual roles, firstly in facilitating the transport of ATG9a-containing vesicles to growing autophagosomes, and secondly in autolysosome formation. The former involves a putative SNARE complex between syntaxin 16, VAMP7 and SNAP-47. The latter occurs via syntaxin 16’s recruitment by Atg8/LC3/GABARAP family proteins to autophagosomes and endo-lysosomes, where syntaxin 16 may act in a manner that bears functional redundancy with the canonical autophagosome Qa-SNARE syntaxin 17. Here, I discuss these recent findings and speculate on the mechanistic aspects of syntaxin 16’s newly found role in autophagy.

VAMP-8 segregates mast cell–preformed mediator exocytosis from cytokine trafficking pathways

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (7) ◽  
pp. 3665-3674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Tiwari ◽  
Cheng-Chun Wang ◽  
Cristiana Brochetta ◽  
Gou Ke ◽  
Francesca Vita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mast Cells ◽  
Inflammatory Responses ◽  
Secretory Granules ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Sensitive Factor ◽  
Syntaxin 4 ◽  
Deficient Mice ◽  
Snare Complex Formation ◽  
Vesicular Compartment

Abstract Inflammatory responses by mast cells are characterized by massive exocytosis of prestored granular mediators followed by cytokine/chemokine release. The vesicular trafficking mechanisms involved remain poorly understood. Vesicular-associated membrane protein-8 (VAMP-8), a member of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide–sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptor (SNARE) family of fusion proteins initially characterized in endosomal and endosomal-lysosomal fusion, may also function in regulated exocytosis. Here we show that in bone marrow–derived mast cells (BMMCs) VAMP-8 partially colocalized with secretory granules and redistributed upon stimulation. This was associated with increased SNARE complex formation with the target t-SNAREs, SNAP-23 and syntaxin-4. VAMP-8–deficient BMMCs exhibited a markedly reduced degranulation response after IgE+ antigen-, thapsigargin-, or ionomycin-induced stimulation. VAMP-8–deficient mice also showed reduced plasma histamine levels in passive systemic anaphylaxis experiments, while cytokine/chemokine release was not affected. Unprocessed TNF accumulated at the plasma membrane where it colocalized with a VAMP-3–positive vesicular compartment but not with VAMP-8. The findings demonstrate that VAMP-8 segregates secretory lysosomal granule exocytosis in mast cells from cytokine/chemokine molecular trafficking pathways.

scholarly journals A common mechanism for the regulation of vesicular SNAREs on phospholipid membranes

2004 ◽  
Vol 377 (3) ◽  
pp. 781-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuang HU ◽  
Colin RICKMAN ◽  
Joe CARROLL ◽  
Bazbek DAVLETOV
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Snare Complex ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Cell Physiology ◽  
Phospholipid Membranes ◽  
Intracellular Traffic ◽  
Protein Receptor ◽  
Liposomal Membranes ◽  
Eukaryotic Organisms ◽  
Protein Attachment

The SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor) family of proteins is essential for membrane fusion in intracellular traffic in eukaryotic organisms. v-SNAREs (vesicular SNAREs) must engage target SNAREs in the opposing membrane to form the fusogenic SNARE complex. Temporal and spatial control of membrane fusion is important for many aspects of cell physiology and may involve the regulation of the SNAREs resident on intracellular membranes. Here we show that the v-SNARE synaptobrevin 2, also known as VAMP (vesicle-associated membrane protein) 2, is restricted from forming the SNARE complex in chromaffin granules from adrenal medullae to the same degree as in brain-purified synaptic vesicles. Our analysis indicates that the previously reported synaptophysin–synaptobrevin interaction is not likely to be involved in regulation of the v-SNARE. Indeed, the restriction can be reproduced for two distinct v-SNARE homologues, synaptobrevin 2 and cellubrevin/VAMP3, by reconstituting them in pure liposomal membranes. Overall, our data uncover a common mechanism for the control of SNARE engagement where intact phospholipid membranes rather than proteins down-regulate vesicular SNAREs in different cellular organelles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document