Social Responses to a Changing Environment

Author(s):  
Lisa Reyes Mason ◽  
Susan P. Kemp ◽  
Lawrence A. Palinkas ◽  
Amy Krings

Communities worldwide are facing environmental crises such as air pollution, water shortages, climate change, and other forms of environmental change and degradation. While technical solutions for environmental change are essential, so too are solutions that consider social acceptability, value cultural relevance, and prioritize equity and social justice. Social work has a critical and urgent role in creating and implementing macrolevel social responses to environmental change. The key concepts of environmental change, environmental and ecological justice, social vulnerability, and social responses are discussed. A description of the roles and skills unique to macro social workers for this effort is given, followed by examples of macrolevel strategies and interventions. Opportunities and directions for future social work responses to a changing environment are identified.

Author(s):  
David Hodgson ◽  
Lynelle Watts
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan Worsley ◽  
Tim Mann ◽  
Angela Olsen ◽  
Elizabeth Mason-Whitehead

Author(s):  
Clayton T. Shorkey ◽  
Michael Uebel

The entry defines Gestalt therapy, including brief history, major influences, contributors, and current status of Gestalt therapy in terms of memberships and journals. Key concepts are outlined, and the effectiveness and potential for Gestalt therapy's status as an evidence-based practice is framed in relation to recent overviews of empirical research and to what is needed in the future for further research. While the current literature in social work does not reflect a strong emphasis on Gestalt, we emphasize some of the philosophical and ethical compatibilities between these approaches.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram A. Cnaan

This introductory article to the symposium on doctoral education in social work aims to provide a framework for the symposium. Doctoral education in social work is continuously in flux. As society and the profession are constantly changing and as academia is also in a state of transition, doctoral education in social work needs to be reassessed. The five papers in this symposium start with understanding the changing environment and then they deal with issues such as policy research, the scientific inquiry, and transdisciplinary research. Finally, it discusses issues of racial and ethnic diversity in doctoral education. The hope is that this set of papers will help shape the discourse regarding social work doctoral education and will help doctoral directors and their peers better plan.


2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita K. Davis ◽  
Aisha D. Williams ◽  
Makungu Akinyela

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Reyes Mason ◽  
Mary Katherine Shires ◽  
Catherine Arwood ◽  
Abigail Borst

Author(s):  
Jay Rothman ◽  
Randi Rothman ◽  
Mary Schwoebel

The concept of creative marginality refers to the process through which researchers in academic fields move away from the mainstream and toward the margins of their fields and look toward the margins of other fields that may overlap with and fill in gaps in their fields. This interaction, occurring outside of disciplinary boundaries, promotes intellectual cross-fertilization, and it is often the site of innovation. This article examines the links and interactions between the academic disciplines and practices of social work and conflict resolution. The article describes the different theoretical frames and practical approaches of both social work and conflict resolution, and discusses the ways in which these are parallel in both fields. Theorists and practitioners in social work and conflict resolution are engaged in debate around three key concepts related to self-determination, empowerment, and professional ethics. The newer and emerging frames of both fields are situated at parallel positions on the continuum of approaches to these key concepts, in their respective professions. These frames favor elicitive rather than prescriptive approaches and increased client or party self-determination, a focus on transformation and empowerment rather than on problem-solving alone, and a stance of engagement and advocacy towards intervention, rather than neutrality and impartiality. The authors argue that increased interchange between the two fields has the potential to contribute to the development of innovative approaches to transforming social conflicts and promoting positive social change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document