scholarly journals 40 Using the Variable Indication of Placement Tool to Drive De-prescribing in the Frail Older Person in an Interdisciplinary Integrated Team

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Athanasiyar Vince ◽  
Isweri Pillay ◽  
Aine O’Reilly ◽  
Eamonn Cooney ◽  
Jennifer Maher ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The variable indicator of placement (VIP) tool is designed to identify patients at risk of frailty. The risk of harm in a frail older person increases as the number of prescribed drugs increases. Polypharmacy may be either appropriate or inappropriate. Deprescribing, aims to withdraw inappropriate medication under supervision, in order to improve outcomes. Methods 50 consecutive patients, attending an emergency department, were triaged with the VIP tool, triggering a single interdisciplinary assessment (SIA) by an integrated care team member. The SIA identified polypharmacy. Drugs which may be causing harm, may no longer be of benefit or were potentially interacting with other drugs, were identified. The Anti-cholinergic Burden (ACB) Score was calculated. Appropriate medication changes were made following interdisciplinary and patient/carer discussion. Patients were selected for one to one pharmacy and patient/carer liaison, which was followed through into their community setting e.g. long term benzodiazepine usage. Results The drugs which were identified for gradual withdrawal or cessation were benzodiazepines (n=6), opiates (n=4), genitourinary (n=2), digoxin (n=2), hyoscine (n=2), domperidone (n=2) and amitryptilline (n=1). The total ACB score for 50 patients was 95 pre-assessment and 65 post-assessment. This represented a 32% reduction in anti-cholinergic burden alone for this frail older adult cohort. Conclusion The VIP tool if used to trigger an SIA, can target those patients at risk of the adverse effects of polypharmacy. The calculated ACB score can trigger meaningful discussion with patients and carers around what matters to them. A system for supervised deprescribing is necessary to ensure successful reduction in ACB.

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (11) ◽  
pp. 1449-1454 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Green ◽  
S. C. Buckley ◽  
A. J. Hamer ◽  
R. M. Kerry ◽  
T. P. Harrison

Aims The management of acetabular defects at the time of revision hip arthroplasty surgery is a challenge. This study presents the results of a long-term follow-up study of the use of irradiated allograft bone in acetabular reconstruction. Patients and Methods Between 1990 and 2000, 123 hips in 110 patients underwent acetabular reconstruction for aseptic loosening, using impaction bone grafting with frozen, irradiated, and morsellized femoral heads and a cemented acetabular component. A total of 55 men and 55 women with a mean age of 64.3 years (26 to 97) at the time of revision surgery are included in this study. Results At a mean follow-up of 16.9 years, there had been 23 revisions (18.7%), including ten for infection, eight for aseptic loosening, and three for dislocation. Of the 66 surviving hips (58 patients) that could be reassessed, 50 hips (42 patients; 75.6%) were still functioning satisfactorily. Union of the graft had occurred in all hips with a surviving implant. Survival analysis for all indications was 80.6% at 15 years (55 patients at risk, 95% confidence interval (CI) 71.1 to 87.2) and 73.7% at 20 years (eight patients at risk, 95% CI 61.6 to 82.5). Conclusion Acetabular reconstruction using frozen, irradiated, and morsellized allograft bone and a cemented acetabular component is an effective method of treatment. It gives satisfactory long-term results and is comparable to other types of reconstruction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1449–54.


2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese S. Richmond ◽  
Donald Kauder ◽  
Janice Hinkle ◽  
Justine Shults

• Background Improving outcomes after serious injury is important to patients, patients’ families, and healthcare providers. Identifying early risk factors for long-term disability after injury will help critical care providers recognize patients at risk. • Objectives To identify early predictors of long-term disability after injury and to ascertain if age, level of disability before injury, posttraumatic psychological distress, and social network factors during hospitalization and recovery significantly contribute to long-term disability after injury. • Methods A prospective, correlational design was used. Injury-specific information on 63 patients with serious, non–central nervous system injury was obtained from medical records; all other data were obtained from interviews (3 per patient) during a 2½-year period. A model was developed to test the theoretical propositions of the disabling process. Predictors of long-term disability were evaluated using path analysis in the context of structural equation modeling. • Results Injuries were predominately due to motor vehicle crashes (37%) or violent assaults (21%). Mean Injury Severity Score was 13.46, and mean length of stay was 12 days. With structural equation modeling, 36% of the variance in long-term disability was explained by predictors present at the time of injury (age, disability before injury), during hospitalization (psychological distress), or soon after discharge (psychological distress, short-term disability after injury). • Conclusions Disability after injury is due partly to an interplay between physical and psychological factors that can be identified soon after injury. By identifying these early predictors, patients at risk for suboptimal outcomes can be detected.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Abdolreza Norouzy

Diagnosis and treatment of malnutrition should be considered in the management of COVID-19 patients to improve both short- and long-term prognosis. Patients at risk for poor outcomes and higher mortality following infection with COVID-19, namely older adults and polymorbid individuals, should be checked for malnutrition through screening and assessment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (6_Supple_B) ◽  
pp. 123-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. El-Husseiny ◽  
B. Masri ◽  
C. Duncan ◽  
D. S. Garbuz

AimsWe investigated the long-term performance of the Tripolar Trident acetabular component used for recurrent dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty. We assessed: 1) rate of re-dislocation; 2) incidence of complications requiring re-operation; and 3) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) pain and functional scores.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively identified 111 patients who had 113 revision tripolar constrained liners between 1994 and 2008. All patients had undergone revision hip arthroplasty before the constrained liner was used: 13 after the first revision, 17 after the second, 38 after the third, and 45 after more than three revisions. A total of 75 hips (73 patients) were treated with Tripolar liners due to recurrent instability with abductor deficiency, In addition, six patients had associated cerebral palsy, four had poliomyelitis, two had multiple sclerosis, two had spina bifida, two had spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, one had previous reversal of an arthrodesis, and 21 had proximal femoral replacements. The mean age of patients at time of Tripolar insertions was 72 years (53 to 89); there were 69 female patients (two bilateral) and 42 male patients. All patients were followed up for a mean of 15 years (10 to 24). Overall, 55 patients (57 hips) died between April 2011 and February 2018, at a mean of 167 months (122 to 217) following their tripolar liner implantation. We extracted demographics, implant data, rate of dislocations, and incidence of other complications.ResultsAt ten years, the Kaplan–Meier survivorship for dislocation was 95.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90 to 98), with 101 patients at risk. At 20 years, the survivorship for dislocation was 90.6% (95% CI 81.0 to 95.5), with one patient at risk. Eight patients (7.2%) had a dislocation of their constrained liners. At ten years, the survival to any event was 89.4% (95% CI 82 to 93.8), with 96 patients at risk. At 20 years, the survival to any event was 82.5% (95% CI 71.9 to 89.3), with one patient at risk. Five hips (4.4%) had deep infection. Two patients (1.8%) developed dissociated constraining rings with pain but without dislocation, which required re-operation. Two patients (1.8%) had periprosthetic femoral fractures, without dislocation, that were treated by revision stems along with exchange of the well-functioning constrained liners.ConclusionConstrained tripolar liners used at revision hip arthroplasty provided favourable results in the long term for treatment of recurrent dislocation and for patients at high risk of dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):123–126.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document