scholarly journals Evaluation of Torac, Warrior, and Coragen for First-Generation Colorado Potato Beetle Management in Wisconsin, 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Z Bradford ◽  
Scott A Chapman ◽  
Russell L Groves
Keyword(s):  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Potato Beetle

scholarly journals Field Efficacy of Steinernema sp. (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) on the Colorado Potato Beetle Overwintering Generation

Plants ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1464
Author(s):  
Maja Čačija ◽  
Renata Bažok ◽  
Majda Kolenc ◽  
Tena Bujas ◽  
Zrinka Drmić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Steinernema Feltiae ◽  
First Year ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Field Efficacy ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Economic Pest

Colorado potato beetle (CPB) is an economic pest of potato that has developed resistance to all classes of chemical insecticides, thus requiring alternative control measures. As a potential solution, entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have proven effective in suppressing this pest, but their efficacy against overwintering generations of CPB in Croatia has not been sufficiently researched. The aim of this two-year (2018–2019) field study was to determine the efficacy of Steinernema feltiae and Steinernema carpocapsae applied to overwintering CPB adults. EPNs were applied at three doses (7.5 mil./10 m2, 5.0 mil./10 m2 (the recommended dose) and 2.5 mil./10 m2) by watering the soil where the adults were overwintering. The first-year results were satisfactory for both EPNs: the efficacy of S. feltiae ranged from 79.03% to 100.00%, while the efficacy of S. carpocapsae ranged from 77.32% to 96.22%. In the second year, the highest efficacy (69.57%) was obtained using the recommended dose of S. feltiae. Although the results are not consistent across the two years of our study and suggest further research, they indicate that EPNs have great potential in controlling overwintering CPB generations to reduce first generation abundance and damage, and also to prevent the spread of new generations to surrounding potato growing areas.

scholarly journals Colorado Potato Beetle Control, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-145
Author(s):  
E.. McEnhill ◽  
E. Grafius ◽  
J. Sirota ◽  
C. Brunt ◽  
J. Ferrigan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Bare Ground ◽  
Light Rain ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Foliar Treatment

Abstract Fifteen insecticide treatments were tested at the MSU Montcalm Research Farm, in Entrican, MI, for their control of Colorado potato beetles (CPB). ‘Snowden’ potatoes were planted 12 inches apart with a 34 inch row spacing on 10 May. Treatments were replicated four times and assigned to plots in a RCB design. The plots measured 40 feet long and were three rows wide. There were at least two rows of bare ground between plots and five feet of untreated potatoes between plots in the same rows. The Admire and Mocap treatments were applied in furrow at planting. The first foliar treatment was applied, at 25% CPB hatch, on 18 June using a tractor-mounted sprayer (30 gal/acre, 40 psi). Subsequent first generation sprays were applied on 29 June and 7 July. Light rain occurred on 7 July before the insecticides had a chance to dry. Insecticide effectiveness was determined by counting the various stages of CPB on two randomly chosen plants from the middle row of each plot. Counts were done on 12 and 23 Jun and 3 and 12 July. Second generation methods were the same as for the first generation with sprays occuring on 19 July, 26 July and 2 Aug and counts on 18, 24 and 31 Jul. All plots other than the two Trigard treatments were sprayed with a maintenance spray of Imidan and PBO. Each plot was assessed for percent defoliation on 3 July and 9 August. The middle row of potatoes from each plot was harvested on 22 August, separated by size and weighed.

scholarly journals Colorado Potato Beetle Control, 1993

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Casey W. Hoy ◽  
Michael J. Dunlap
Keyword(s):  
Seed Piece ◽  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Plant Spacing ◽  
Single Application ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Vine Killer

Abstract ‘Gemchip’ potatoes were planted 26 May at the Fry Farm, OARDC, Wooster, OH. Plant spacing was 36 inches between rows and 9 inches between plants. Three Admire 2F seed piece treatments were applied at planting using a CO2 compression sprayer at 40 psi with an 8004 flat fan nozzle delivering the insecticide into the seed furrow. The field was treated on 16 Jun with 0.75 lb/ acre of Sencor DF. Fungicide, Dithane at 2.0 lb/acre, was applied 9 Aug. Paraquat, 1 pt/acre, was applied 7 Sep as a vine killer. Plots were two rows wide and 40 ft in length, with 10 ft alleys separating plots and 6 ft alleys separating blocks. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design. Foliar treatments were initiated when the first generation larvae were increasing in the plots in early Jul. Foliar applications were made 3 and 12 Jul and 3 and 12 Aug. The Trigard single application treatment was applied only on 3 Jul and 3 Aug. Foliar treatments were applied with a tractor mounted drop nozzle boom sprayer delivering 50 gal/acre at 50 psi with three D-4 hollow cone nozzles/row. Bond spreader sticker was added at 4 oz/ 100 gal solution to all rates of the following insecticides: Prokill Cryolite 96, AC303,630, M-Trak, and Novodor. Number of eggs, small larvae (instar 1-2), large larvae (instar 3-4), and adults were counted, and percent defoliation was visually estimated, in five 1-m lengths of row per plot approximately five days after each application.

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE COLORADO POTATO BEETLE LEPTINOTARSA DECEMLINEATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) IN QUEBEC BY AUGMENTATIVE RELEASES OF THE TWO-SPOTTED STINKBUG PERILLUS BIOCULATUS (HEMIPTERA: PENTATOMIDAE)

1995 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conrad Cloutier ◽  
France Bauduin
Keyword(s):  
Biological Control ◽  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Release Time ◽  
Egg Mass ◽  
Predator Density ◽  
Predator Prey ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Perillus Bioculatus ◽  
Augmentative Releases

AbstractField plot tests during two seasons show that augmentative releases of Perillus bioculatus can control first-generation eggs and larvae of the Colorado potato beetle (CPB) under Quebec short-season conditions. Stinkbugs mass-reared on CPB were introduced manually as 2nd- and 3rd-stage nymphs during spring oviposition of the beetle at densities of one nymph per 50–225 CPB eggs recruited per plant, in 0.025-ha plots. Sampling at intervals of 1–3 days measured predator establishment, CPB egg and larval mortality, and foliage protection level. Direct observations were used to document predator-prey relationships and to determine weather conditions favourable to P. bioculatus.In the 1 st-year test, with predators released over all plants within plots, CPB control was compared among: (1) stinkbugs alone, (2) the bioinsecticide Bacillus thuringiensis (BT) as Trident™, (3) a combination of both control alternatives, and (4) no protection against the CPB. BT and stinkbugs, both alone and in combination, produced significant control as measured by percentage reductions in prepupal drop to the ground, new adult emergence, and foliage protection. Only treatments involving P. bioculatus reduced CPB egg eclosion which was the key control factor; it is strongly correlated with overall control level.In the 2nd-year test, predators were released in a central area comprising only 25% of all plants within plots. Predator and CPB egg mass densities were manipulated to produce predator: prey ratios of 0:1, 0:2, 1.5:2, 1.5:1, 3:2, and 3:1, representing average ratios of 0, 1.5,or 3 P. bioculatus per plant, and 1 or 2 CPB egg masses per plant at release time. As expected, central release produced complex interactions between control, and predator and prey densities. High beetle density slowed predator emigration from the centre, more so at low predator density than at high predator density. Predators moved more quickly within the same row than across rows. CPB eggs were destroyed in large numbers in both years but in 1993, final control correlated with larval rather than egg predation. A maximum 80% reduction in prepupal drop to the ground was obtained at the 3:1 predator:prey ratio (1 P. bioculatus:95 CPB eggs recruited per plant).The results prove the efficacy of P. bioculatus for biological control of first-generation L. decemlineata populations, at densities resulting in approximately 300 eggs laid per plant during spring oviposition in the study area. Despite low natural populations of P. bioculatus and unclear prospects for commercial availability at reasonable cost, it is evident that stinkbug releases have potential as a non-chemical control measure within an IPM program in Quebec potato production.

Effects of Straw and Leaf Mulches and Trickle Irrigation on the Abundance of Colorado Potato Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Potato in Connecticut

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Stoner
Keyword(s):  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
Leptinotarsa Decemlineata ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Trickle Irrigation ◽  
Straw Mulch ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Leptinotarsa Decemlineata Say ◽  
Leaf Mulch ◽  
Leaf Mulches ◽  
Eggs And Larvae

Straw mulch reduced the number of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), larvae on potato during the first generation, and reduced the proportion of stems that were more than 50% defoliated compared to unmulched and unirrigated control plots. Leaf mulch and trickle irrigation did not affect number of larvae or the proportion of heavily defoliated plants compared to the control. None of the treatments significantly affected the number of adults per stem until the end of the first generation and none affected the number of egg masses, so the straw mulch must affect mortality or development of eggs and larvae. Both types of mulch and trickle irrigation increased yield relative to the control, perhaps due to lower soil temperature in a hot, dry year.

Managing Colorado Potato Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and European Corn Borers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Potato with Foliar Applications of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner

2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Nault ◽  
John Speese
Keyword(s):  
Bacillus Thuringiensis ◽  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
European Corn Borer ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Solanum Tuberosum L ◽  
Potato Crop ◽  
Corn Borer ◽  
Corn Borers ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Leptinotarsa Decemlineata Say

Application timing and rate combinations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner used for protecting Irish potato, Solanum tuberosum L., from defoliation by the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), and stem injury by the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), were investigated. Significant reductions in defoliation levels during bloom, populations of first-generation potato beetle adults, and the percentage of stems injured by corn borers at the end of the season in B. thuringiensis-treated potato were considered criteria for a successful management strategy. Although Colorado potato beetle infestations were managed effectively with B. thuringiensis, European corn borer populations were not reduced to a commercially acceptable level. In each of 3 yrs, neither an increase in the number of applications (from 1 to 4) nor an increase in rate (from 0.9 to 3.8 liters/ha) of B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki improved the level of corn borer control. In contrast, results indicated that 1 application of B. thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis, timed when there was >1 large potato beetle larva per stem, using a 4.7 liters/ha rate protected the potato crop during the bloom stage. However, this strategy may not be sufficient to prevent significant levels of defoliation by first-generation potato beetle adults during post-bloom or reduce the size of this population, which will infest next season's crop. For this reason, the B. thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis timing and rate regimen described above may be most effective in fields where the overwintering potato beetle population is predicted to be low to moderate (e.g., <1 adult per 5 stems), whereas two applications may be most effective in fields where densities are greater.

scholarly journals Colorado Potato Beetle Control, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Casey W. Hoy ◽  
Michael J. Dunlap
Keyword(s):  
Colorado Potato Beetle ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Hollow Cone ◽  
Potato Beetle ◽  
Randomized Complete Block Design ◽  
Vine Killer

Abstract ‘Gemchip’ potatoes were planted 12 May at the Fry Farm, OARDC, Wooster, OH. Plani spacing was 36 inches between rows and 9 inches between plants. Fertilizer was applied at planting (1750 lb/acre 10-20-20). The field was treated on 7 Jun with 0.75 lb/acre of Sencor DF. Fungicide, Dithane at 2.0 lb/acre, was applied at 12, 19, 26 Jul, 3, 18, 26 Aug, 2 Sep, and Penncozeb at 2.0 Vol acre was applied 10 Aug. Paraquat, 1 pt/acre, was applied 8 and 21 Sep as a vine killer. Plots were two rows wide and 50 ft in length, with 12 ft alleys separating plots and 6 ft alleys separating blocks. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design. Foliar treatments were initiated when the first generation larvae were increasing in the plots and defoliation averaged between 21 and 25.25%. Foliar applications were applied 22 Jun, 1, 12, 19 Jul, and 10 Aug with a tractor mounted drop nozzle boom sprayer delivering 50 gal/acre at 50 psi with three D-4 hollow cone nozzles/row. Number of eggs, small (instar 1-2), large (instar 3-4) larvae, and adults were counted and percent defoliation was visually estimated in five 1-m lengths of row per plot weekly. Leafhopper nymphs and aphids were sampled by visually inspecting 5 compound leaves per plot on and after 6 Jul.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document