scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes in Patients (P) with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (Mrcc) Receiving Several Lines of Target Therapy: Retrospective Analyses of a Cohort of Three Multidisciplinary Centres from Spain

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv293
Author(s):  
M. Jové Casulleras ◽  
O. Etxaniz ◽  
N. Sala Gonzalez ◽  
A. Font ◽  
L. Jimenez ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 341-341
Author(s):  
Matthew D Tucker ◽  
Katy Beckermann ◽  
Kristin Kathleen Ancell ◽  
Kerry Schaffer ◽  
Renee McAlister ◽  
...  

341 Background: Neutrophilia is known to be associated with worse prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, less is known about the role of eosinophils in the response to immunotherapy (IO). We investigated the association of the baseline neutrophil to eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to IO-based combination treatment in mRCC. Methods: Patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, or avelumab plus axitinib at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center were retrospectively identified. Patients on >10mg prednisone and patients with prior IO were excluded. Baseline NER (at time of first IO) and association with progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were investigated. Data cutoff was 9/1/2020. Analysis for PFS and OS was performed using the log-rank test and Mantel-Haenszel method, and analysis of the odds ratio for ORR was performed using Fischer’s exact test. Results: Sixty-one patients were identified: 89% clear cell histology, 74% prior nephrectomy, 69% IMDC intermediate risk, and 72% treatment-naïve. Patients with baseline NER < median (N=31) had improved clinical outcomes compared to patients with baseline NER > median (N=30) (Table). Improvement in PFS by NER was maintained when stratified by anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 and anti-PD(L)-1/VEGF (p= 0.0062 and p= 0.049); however, differences in OS and ORR were no longer significant. The median baseline NER among patients with partial response (PR) was significantly lower at 22.7 (95% CI 18.9-31.1) vs. 51.6 (95% CI 39.5-93.1) among those with progressive disease (PD) (p= 0.0054). For comparison, the median neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was not significantly different between PR (2.60) and PD (3.84, p= 0.056). Conclusions: Patients with a low baseline NER treated with IO-based combinations had improved clinical outcomes compared to patients with a high baseline NER. Additional investigation of this parameter in larger cohorts is warranted. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anubha Bharthuar ◽  
Himanshu Pandey ◽  
Swapan Sood

The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved considerably in the last decade. A number of different systemic molecular targeted agents that have been recently approved have improved the survival of patients with mRCC. This mini-review focuses on the implementation of multi-modality therapy in the management of mRCC and the approved indications of the various available novel agents. These novel agents have expanded our armamentarium and improved clinical outcomes of this challenging disease that has considerable biological heterogeneity and clinical variability.  


2014 ◽  
Vol 191 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Atkinson ◽  
Sarathi Kalra ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
Tharakeswara Bathala ◽  
Paul Corn ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 444-444
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Matsubara ◽  
Hirofumi Mukai ◽  
Yoichi Naito ◽  
Kuniaki Itoh

444 Background: The clinical course of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has a wide spectrum that ranges from indolent to rapidly progressive disease. Initial active surveillance (AS) followed by deferred systemic target therapy might be a treatment option in a subpopulation of patients with indolent mRCC. However, very few studies have been published about AS and its outcome as well as potential predictive factor that might be associated with indolent mRCC. Here, we report clinical outcomes of mRCC patients who initially were monitored by AS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical and pathological data of mRCC patients who initially were monitored by planned AS prior to systemic therapy due to asymptomatic or slowly progressive disease at National Cancer Center Hospital East between 2000 and 2011. The primary outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 29 patients were eligible for this analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 69 years, and all patients had a good general condition with a performance status of 0 or 1. A total of 65% of patients had recurrent disease and 35% were in stage 4. All of the patients had undergone nephrectomy, and 86% had clear cell carcinoma. None of the patients was categorized into a poor risk group according to both MSKCC and Heng criteria. The median follow-up period was 35.4 months. During the follow-up period, disease progression was observed in 72% of patients but only 14% died. The median PFS time was 26.1 months. After disease progression was observed, only 58% of these patients received treatment or intervention. The median OS have not been reached yet, but 12, 24 and 48 months OS rates were 96.4, 88.7 and 83.8%, respectively. Conclusions: PFS and OS of patients who underwent AS were extremely favorable. For these indolent subpopulations, AS might be a treatment option, so toxic and expensive systemic target therapy could be deferred for a significant period of time without prognostic disadvantage. However, further observational study with a larger sample size might be needed in order to identify the exact subpopulation eligible for AS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document