scholarly journals Plasma fibrinogen as prognostic predictor in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving target therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1384-1392
Author(s):  
Lihe Wang ◽  
Wen Cai ◽  
Wen Kong ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
Yonghui Chen ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 444-444
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Matsubara ◽  
Hirofumi Mukai ◽  
Yoichi Naito ◽  
Kuniaki Itoh

444 Background: The clinical course of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has a wide spectrum that ranges from indolent to rapidly progressive disease. Initial active surveillance (AS) followed by deferred systemic target therapy might be a treatment option in a subpopulation of patients with indolent mRCC. However, very few studies have been published about AS and its outcome as well as potential predictive factor that might be associated with indolent mRCC. Here, we report clinical outcomes of mRCC patients who initially were monitored by AS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical and pathological data of mRCC patients who initially were monitored by planned AS prior to systemic therapy due to asymptomatic or slowly progressive disease at National Cancer Center Hospital East between 2000 and 2011. The primary outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 29 patients were eligible for this analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 69 years, and all patients had a good general condition with a performance status of 0 or 1. A total of 65% of patients had recurrent disease and 35% were in stage 4. All of the patients had undergone nephrectomy, and 86% had clear cell carcinoma. None of the patients was categorized into a poor risk group according to both MSKCC and Heng criteria. The median follow-up period was 35.4 months. During the follow-up period, disease progression was observed in 72% of patients but only 14% died. The median PFS time was 26.1 months. After disease progression was observed, only 58% of these patients received treatment or intervention. The median OS have not been reached yet, but 12, 24 and 48 months OS rates were 96.4, 88.7 and 83.8%, respectively. Conclusions: PFS and OS of patients who underwent AS were extremely favorable. For these indolent subpopulations, AS might be a treatment option, so toxic and expensive systemic target therapy could be deferred for a significant period of time without prognostic disadvantage. However, further observational study with a larger sample size might be needed in order to identify the exact subpopulation eligible for AS.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 63-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva ◽  
Diedra Gustafson ◽  
Leticia Nogueira ◽  
Priya N. Werahera ◽  
Wilson R Molina ◽  
...  

Conventional chemotherapy is associated with poor outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Advances in the understanding of tumor molecular biology and the implementation of new drugs that target these molecular pathways have increased the arsenal against advanced RCC and improved outcomes in these patients. Herein, we briefly describe the latest data on targeted therapies used in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Search strategy was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Abstracts of relevant studies published in PubMed between 2000 and 2014 were analyzed by two authors. Abstracts were selected if they were published in English, data reported was of phase II or III clinical trials, and outcomes followed FDA approval.  If consensus between the two authors was achieved, they were included in the review. Key words used were “target therapy” and “metastatic renal cell carcinoma”. The results of the studies analyzed in this review support the benefits of targeted therapy in metastatic RCC. These include improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life as well as reduced toxicities compared to immunotherapy. The improvement in outcomes in metastatic RCC makes these drugs a preferred option as a primary treatment for these patients. 


Urology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Matsubara ◽  
Hirofumi Mukai ◽  
Yoichi Naito ◽  
Kuniaki Itoh ◽  
Yoshinobu Komai ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document