scholarly journals Vinflunine for patients with urothelial carcinoma resistant to first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. A pooled analysis of efficacy and safety results in the real-world setting

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. iv36
Author(s):  
G. Pappagallo ◽  
M. Rizzo ◽  
D. Sartori ◽  
O. Caffo
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Dora Čerina ◽  
Višnja Matković ◽  
Kristina Katić ◽  
Ingrid Belac Lovasić ◽  
Robert Šeparović ◽  
...  

Background. Although today it is almost preventable, cervical cancer still represents a significant cancer burden, especially in some developing parts of the world. Since the introduction of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, improvements of the outcomes were noted. However, results from randomized controlled trials are often hard to recreate in the real-world setting. Objective. To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as a first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the total population of Croatian patients diagnosed with metastatic cervical cancer from 2016 to 2019 who were treated with bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and paclitaxel (TCB) in the first line. The comparison group was the consecutive sample of patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, incidence of adverse events, and the proportion of treatment discontinuation. Results. We enrolled 67 patients treated with TCB and a control group of 62 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The TCB cohort had significantly longer unadjusted OS with a median of 27.0 (95% CI 18.5; not calculable) months, compared to 15.5 (10.7; 30.1) months in the chemotherapy-alone cohort. Adjusted OS was not significantly different. PFS was significantly longer for the TCB cohort, with a median of 10.6 (95% CI 8.5; 15.4) months, than for the chemotherapy-alone cohort, with a median of 5.4 (95% CI 3.9; 9.1) months, even after adjustment for baseline covariates (HRadjusted = 0.60; 95% CI 0.39; 0.94; p = 0.027 ; false discovery rate <5%). Conclusions. In a real-world setting, TCB as a first-line treatment of metastatic cervical cancer was associated with longer PFS, better objective disease control rate, and acceptable toxicity profile in comparison to chemotherapy alone. These results may indicate its utility and potential applicability in other parts of the developing world.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 282-282
Author(s):  
Hailiang Li ◽  
Hongtao Hu ◽  
Guangshao Cao ◽  
Gang Wu ◽  
Pengxu Ding ◽  
...  

282 Background: Combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with apatinib are emerging as an effective treatment for patients with intermediate to advanced stage HCC. However, the data of HCC treated by apatinib in the real-world setting are not reported. In this real-world study, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of HCC pts which underwent TACE combine with apatinib. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter observational study in a real-world setting and this study was approved by our Ethics Committee. Pts aged ≥18 years with well diagnosed intermediate or advanced stage HCC were included. The pts received apatinib plus TACE treatment as the first-line therapy. TACE treatment was performed on demand, the dose of apatinib was selected by the investigator. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival rate (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profile. All of the objective response was assessed by independent central review per mRECIST criteria. Results: From Jun 2019 to Feb 2020, a total of 98 well diagnosed HCC pts with age from 31 to 86 were enrolled in this study. As of August 2020, the median follow-up was 9.5 months. The mPFS of 98 pts was 7 months. The ORR, DCR and 6 months OS rate was 35.7%, 76.5% and 82.6%, respectively.The PFS was 7.5 months in intermediate stage and 6.4 months in advanced stage. The ORR was 46.3% in intermediate stage (41 cases) and 28% in advanced stage (57 cases) HCC. And the 6 months OS rate was 90.2% in intermediate stage and 77.1% in advanced stage HCC. Overall, 17 (17.3%) pts had grade≥3 treatment-related AEs. All of the safety adverse effects can be tolerated or reduced after symptomatic treatment and no unexpected adverse events were observed. Conclusions: In this real-world study, apatinib showed a favorable efficacy and safety profile in pts with intermediate and advanced stage cancer. Apatinib combination TACE therapy might lead to better survival benefit in first-line treatment for HCC pts. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900024030.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 275-275
Author(s):  
Carla Pires Amaro ◽  
Michael J Allen ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Erica S Tsang ◽  
Howard John Lim ◽  
...  

275 Background: The REFLECT trial establishedlenvatinib (LEN) as a first-line treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Compared to sorafenib (S), LEN has a higher objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) with a slightly different toxicity profile. The aim of this study was to gather data regarding the efficacy and safety of LEN when used in the real-world treatment of HCC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine LEN use in HCC patients treated outside of Asia. Methods: HCC patients treated with LEN from 10 cancer centers in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and Nova Scotia between July 2018 to July 2020 were included. Overall survival (OS), PFS, disease control rate (DCR) and ORR were retrospectively analyzed and compared across first- and second-to-fourth line use of LEN. ORR was determined radiographically according to the treating physician´s opinion in clinical notes and not RECIST 1.1 or mRECIST. Toxicities were also examined. Results: A total of 220 patients were included in this analysis. Median age was 67 years, 80% were men and 25.5% East Asian. The most frequent causes of liver disease were hepatitis C (37%) and B (26%). 62% of patients received any localized treatment before LEN, of those 26% had TACE, 15% TARE and 7.7% had liver transplant. Before starting LEN 29% of patients were ECOG 0 and 59% were ECOG 1. Most patients were Child-Pugh A (81%) and BCLC stage C (75.5%). Main portal vein invasion was present in 14% of the patients. Median follow-up was 4.5 months. A total of 173 patients (79%) received LEN as first line therapy and 47 patients (21%) were treated in second-to-fourth line. Of patients receiving LEN in first line, 22 (13%) started treatment with S, but switched to LEN before progression due to poor tolerance of S. ORR, DCR, PFS and OS are shown in the table. Toxicities occurred in 86% of patients and led to dose reductions in 76 (35%) patients and drug discontinuation in 53 (24%) patients. The most common side effects were fatigue (59%), hypertension (41%), decreased appetite (25%) and diarrhea (22%). Conclusions: Outcomes of HCC patients treated in Canada with LEN in the first line are comparable to those demonstrated in the REFLECT trial, despite the inclusion of Child-Pugh B and ECOG >1 patients. LEN use in second or later lines also showed similar outcomes, although more conclusions are difficult to draw due to the small numbers. LEN appears to be effective and safe in real world practice outside of Asia in first- and second-to-fourth line treatment of HCC. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Keigo Chida ◽  
Daisuke Kotani ◽  
Kentaro Sawada ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Akihito Kawazoe ◽  
...  

43 Background: Regorafenib (REG) and trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride (FTD/TPI) demonstrated overall survival (OS) benefit in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the CORRECT and RECOURSE phase III trials. In Japan, REG and FTD/TPI have been approved in 2013 and 2014, respectively. However, little is known about survival impact on these agents in the real-world setting. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effects of REG and FTD/TPI in pts with mCRC. Methods: We collected medical records from consecutive 1142 pts who had been initiated with first-line chemotherapy for mCRC from 2008 to 2016 at National Cancer Center Hospital East. The survival outcomes were compared between pts from 2008 to 2011 (cohort A) and those from 2012 to 2016 (cohort B). This study excluded pts who have not been refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti-EGFR antibody if KRAS exon 2/ RAS wild-type tumors. Results: A total of 590 pts were analyzed (cohort A; N = 236 and cohort B; N = 354). More patients received at least one of REG or FTD/TPI in cohort B (16.1% vs. 59.9%, p < 0.001). The time from initiation to end of standard chemotherapy was comparable between the two cohort (20.0 vs. 17.5 months, p = 0.266). With a median follow-up period of 34.9 months, salvage-line OS (sOS) after standard chemotherapy was significantly longer in cohort B (4.8 vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.001), while there was only a favorable trend in cohort B in terms of OS from start of first-line treatment (27.3 vs. 28.5 months, p = 0.516). In cohort B, pts who sequentially received both of REG and FTD/TPI showed longest sOS (median, both of REG and FTD/TPI; 11.3 months, either REG or FTD/TPI; 7.0 months, neither REG nor FTD/TPI; 3.1 months). Conclusions: Our study showed that REG and FTD/TPI led to prolongation of sOS in the real-world setting, indicating the importance of strategies which make all active agents available to pts with mCRC.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Russo ◽  
Anna Rago ◽  
Riccardo Proietti ◽  
Federica Di Meo ◽  
Andrea Antonio Papa ◽  
...  

The aim of our article is to provide a concise review for clinicians entailing the main studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of target-specific oral anticoagulants (TSOAs) for thromboembolic stroke prevention in the real-world setting. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common supraventricular arrhythmias that requires anticoagulation therapy to prevent stroke and systemic embolism. TSOAs, dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban have become available as an alternative to warfarin anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Randomized clinical trials showed non-inferior or superior results in efficacy and safety of the TSOAs compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in NVAF patients. For this reason, the 2012 update to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of AF recommends TSOAs as broadly preferable to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the vast majority of patients with NVAF [Camm et al. 2012]. Although the clinical trial results and the guideline’s indications, there is a need for safety and efficacy data from unselected patients in everyday clinical practice. Recently, a large number of studies testing the efficacy and the safety of TSOAs in clinical practice have been published. The aim of our article is to provide a concise review for clinicians, outlining the main studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of TSOAs for thromboembolic stroke prevention in the real-world setting.


2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 347-354
Author(s):  
RUTH PETTENGELL ◽  
THOMAS WOLFF ◽  
THOMAS GOEHLER ◽  
NICOLA CASCAVILLA

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3488-3488
Author(s):  
Kellie Ryan ◽  
Chakkarin Burudpakdee ◽  
Xiaohui Zhao ◽  
Hannah Le ◽  
Aimee Near

Introduction Acalabrutinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on October 31, 2017 for patients with MCL who have progressed on at least one prior therapy and is currently being evaluated in phase III trials for first-line MCL, first-line CLL, and relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL. Additionally, acalabrutinib received guideline and compendia listing for use in MCL and CLL patients. There is a lack of information on the current treatment patterns with acalabrutinib in real world clinical practice. To that end, we conducted a descriptive analysis of the use of acalabrutinib in the real-world setting for MCL and CLL patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using IQVIA's longitudinal prescription (LRx) database linked to the medical claims (Dx) database. Patients ≥18 years old with ≥1 claim for acalabrutinib in LRx between November 1, 2017 and April 30, 2019 were identified; the first claim was index date. Patients were also required to have ≥ 1 Dx claim between November 1, 2016 and April 30, 2019, and ≥ 12 months baseline (defined as ≥ 1 LRx claim and ≥ 1 Dx claim within 12 months pre-index and &gt; 12 months pre-index). Patients were required to have ≥2 diagnoses of either MCL or CLL before index (without diagnosis of the other cancer) to create two mutually exclusive cohorts. Patients were excluded if they had data quality issues or evidence of clinical trial enrollment during the study period. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline demographic and clinical characteristics overall and stratified by prior ibrutinib use. Results were described for MCL and CLL cohorts separately. Results A total of 264 MCL and 204 CLL patients treated with acalabrutinib were identified in the study. For both cohorts, the majority (57.2% MCL / 59.3% CLL) were 70 years or older, with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 71.0 (15.0), mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 70.5 (9.7) for MCL and median age of 71.5 (15.0), mean 69.9 (11.1) for CLL patients (Table 1). 76.9% of MCL and 59.8% of CLL patients were male, and over half were commercially insured (50.4% MCL / 52.5% CLL). In the 12-month pre-index period, MCL and CLL patients had a mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI, excluding hematologic malignancies) of 1.6 (2.2) and 1.4 (1.8), respectively; hypertension (67.8% MCL / 67.7% CLL), other hematologic malignancies (48.9% MCL / 52.0% CLL), and infection (28.0% MCL / 31.4% CLL) were the most common comorbidities. Other common (i.e., ≥ 20%) conditions included anemia and neutropenia for the MCL cohort, and arrhythmia, fatigue/asthenia, atrial fibrillation (A-fib), anemia and thrombocytopenia for the CLL cohort. Over 60% of MCL and CLL acalabrutinib-treated patients were defined as high risk of A-Fib (Chyou, Hunter et al. 2015). In terms of prior Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase-inhibitor (BTKi) treatment, 37.9% of MCL and 64.7% of CLL patients had prior ibrutinib use. More prior ibrutinib users were defined as high risk A-Fib status at time of acalabrutinib start than patients without prior ibrutinib use, and prior ibrutinib users had a higher frequency of several comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, fatigue/asthenia; Table 1). Conclusions With the relatively recent approval, this is the first analysis of acalabrutinib use in clinical practice and description of characteristics of MCL and CLL patients being treated with this medication in the real world. Before initiating acalabrutinib, approximately one-third of MCL patients and two-thirds of CLL patients received ibrutinib (reasons for discontinuing ibrutinib were not explored). Although the overall comorbidity score was similar between patients with and without prior BTKi exposure, BTKi-naïve patients had a slightly lower frequency of high-risk A-Fib status at acalabrutinib initiation. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the treatment patterns of acalabrutinib and outcomes in the real-world setting. Disclosures Ryan: AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Burudpakdee:IQVIA: Consultancy. Zhao:IQVIA: Consultancy. Le:AstraZeneca: Employment, Other: Stocks. Near:IQVIA: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Acalabrutinib is an oral inhibitor of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on October 31, 2017 for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have progressed on at least one prior therapy and is currently being evaluated in phase III trials for first-line MCL, first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and relapsed/refractory CLL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21112-e21112
Author(s):  
Javier De Castro ◽  
Begoña Campos Balea ◽  
Diego Perez Parente ◽  
Letizia Polito ◽  
Marcus Lawrance ◽  
...  

e21112 Background: The phase III IMpower150 study showed efficacy benefits with atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, carboplatin and paclitaxel (ABCP; arm B) as first-line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) with metastatic non-squamous (nsq) NSCLC. The FDA approved this regimen for these pts (with no EGFR or ALK mutations [WT]) on December 2018. However, to date there is limited evidence on its use in real life. This study aimed to explore the use of ABCP in the real-world setting and to describe the characteristics of early adopters (those who received ABCP in 1L). Methods: Data were extracted from the Flatiron Health database (US population). Pts with advanced stage IIIB/IV nsq NSCLC at diagnosis receiving ABCP regimen in any line were eligible for the study. Finally, early adopters were selected. Results: A total of 67 pts received the ABCP regimen in 1L. Baseline characteristics for these pts and comparisons with the IMpower150 population are summarized in Table. Real-world (rw) response in the WT group ( n = 49; 6 pts were excluded due to EGFR mutations and 12 because minimum follow-up was not reached) was similar to that of the IMpower150 series (rwRR: 55.1% [40.2-69.3] vs. 63.5% [58.2-68.5]), despite the WT population being older with a higher proportion of ECOG PS = 1. In patients who would have met the IMpower150 inclusion criteria ( n = 24), rwRR was 70.8% (48.9-87.4). Conclusions: The ABCP regimen has been adopted in the real-world setting. In terms of efficacy, response rates and current PFS data were in line with trial results, despite the population being unselected and having a worse clinical profile. Longer follow-up is required for rwOS data. vs. arm B IMpower150 results.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document